On 11/18/2010 07:38 PM, Matthew Twomey wrote:
> I grabbed this from SVN and compiled it. I tried annotating with with
> both Stockfish an Crafty.
>
> Stockfish UCI
> -
> Annotation appears to function as designed when "Annotate all moves" is
> enabled.
>
> Crafty 23.1
> ---
> Ab
I grabbed this from SVN and compiled it. I tried annotating with with
both Stockfish an Crafty.
Stockfish UCI
-
Annotation appears to function as designed when "Annotate all moves" is
enabled.
Crafty 23.1
---
About every other time I start a Crafty analysis, the annotation tex
On 11/18/2010 01:09 AM, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote:
Hi,
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Joost 't Hart
> wrote:
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Maybe yes, maybe no ;-)
>>
>> I put it in CVS, but did not manage to get anything useful in the prompt
>> box. Maybe you know how to make an engine crash and produc
On 11/18/2010 06:42 PM, Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi,
> 2010/11/17:
>> From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr]
>> Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06
>> Hi,
2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart:
Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine
run up to the move number spe
On 11/18/2010 06:50 PM, Alexander Wagner wrote:
Hi,
> On 11/16/10 23:14, Joost 't Hart wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>> In the second case, how do you do it? just changing BINDIR and
>>> SHAREDIR paths before make and make install?
>>
>> I download, compile, patch, etc at some place (cvs calls it a sandbox,
On 11/16/10 23:14, Joost 't Hart wrote:
Hi!
>> In the second case, how do you do it? just changing BINDIR and
>> SHAREDIR paths before make and make install?
>
> I download, compile, patch, etc at some place (cvs calls it a sandbox, I
> always
> have a few in parallel), and build and run it there
On 11/16/10 18:39, Fulvio wrote:
Hi!
>> Right there could be some destructive interaction. Still, you have to
>> do something outside the comment editor, I fancy, for Scid to change
>> the position, right? In that case the editor would loose the focus,
>> right?
> Yes.
> The problem was the edito
2010/11/17 :
> From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06
> Hi,
>>> 2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart :
>>> Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine
>>> run up to the move number specified.
>>
>> Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ?