[Scid-users] Can not run with Cocoa based Tk

2010-11-17 Thread Israel Chauca F.
Hi there, I'm trying to use the new Cocoa based build of Tk, but Scid exits after this message: num matched toplevel windows does not equal num children It happens in updateBoard around line 1513 of end.tcl, any pointers about how to proceed debugging it? I'm not sure what the message means.

Re: [Scid-users] Computer annotation issue

2010-11-17 Thread Joost 't Hart
Ok guys, I am done. Give it a go! And please report anything you do not like. Cheers, Joost. On 10/25/2010 09:17 PM, Matthew Twomey wrote: > Greetings all, > > A. I am a beginning/intermediate player and I've started using SCID > to track my games. I like to use the blunder check

Re: [Scid-users] Games request

2010-11-17 Thread J. Wesley Cleveland
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Joost 't Hart wrote: > Thanks, > > Maybe yes, maybe no ;-) > > I put it in CVS, but did not manage to get anything useful in the prompt > box. Maybe you know how to make an engine crash and produce something > useful? > > Cheers, > Joost. > If you put these lines

Re: [Scid-users] Making information field taller?

2010-11-17 Thread Milan Zamazal
The following patch seems to do basically the right thing (please pardon if my near-zero knowledge of Tcl/Tk exhibits in it): Index: start.tcl === RCS file: /cvsroot/scid/scid/tcl/start.tcl,v retrieving revision 1.100 diff -u -r1.100

Re: [Scid-users] Annotation - Spec discussion

2010-11-17 Thread joost.t.hart
From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr] Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06 Hi, >> 2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart : >> Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine >> run up to the move number specified. > > Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ? Yes. > If so it sho

Re: [Scid-users] Annotation - Spec discussion

2010-11-17 Thread Pascal Georges
2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart : > Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine run > up to the move number specified. Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ? If so it should remain in place as it is useful for some people (like me). Pascal