Henk van Lingen wrote:
Hi!
>> Actually, the chagnes to Scid were not that dramatical,
>> mainly some cleanup, but there were some changes
>> necessary in dgtdrv. So in case you want to use a DGT
>> board please make sure that you have at least V1.21 of
>> dgtdrv. It's in dgtdrv's CVS right now.
>
Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
> I don't stick by heart to it. I'd suggest to port over the
> statistics, maybe also an evaluation at the end, say, the
> line played with the annotations from the mask, all the ? an
> ?! one moved and maybe the commentary if any. Just to give
> some
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 02:54:11PM +0100, Alexander Wagner wrote:
>
> Actually, the chagnes to Scid were not that dramatical,
> mainly some cleanup, but there were some changes necessary
> in dgtdrv. So in case you want to use a DGT board please
> make sure that you have at least V1.21 of dgtdrv.
