Re: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging

On Thursday 17 May 2012 6:35:18 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Supposed to happen next thursday. > > Do we have any plan? > I am working on stuff to make release tarballs -- planning to use CPack. I doubt I'll be ready by next Thursday, however. But possible. Don't be surprised if we need to de

KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging

Supposed to happen next thursday. Do we have any plan? Albert ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela > > wrote: > > > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > > wrote: > > > I think w

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... I think as long as you didn't advertise the D-Bus in

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela > wrote: > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are > the DBus >

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> @Packagers: We will

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

El Dijous, 17 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:14, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > Hey > @Translators: You probably want to preserve the translations in > kde-runtime/nepomuk. How do we go about this? That's not a problem. Albert ___ release-team mailing list

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

On Thursday 17 May 2012 10:01:14 AM Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey > > I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. > > As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - > > * nepomuk-core [1] > * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] > * nepomuk-kde-config [3] > > kde-runtime/nepomuk will be re

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email. On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey > > I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. > > As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - > > * nepomuk-core [1] > * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] > * nepomuk-kde-co

Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

Hey I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - * nepomuk-core [1] * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] * nepomuk-kde-config [3] kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed. Kdelibs will not be touched. All the headers are being installed under n

KSecrets State?

Hi, A few weeks ago, KSecrets working state was challenged and considered as still alpha but as we could not agree on removing it from 4.8 releases, it stayed there. Now is the question on whether it improved for 4.9 and should be kept in the 4.9 release series or if it should be put in a deve