On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela <nos...@vuorela.dk > <mailto:nos...@vuorela.dk>> wrote: > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg <tr...@kde.org <mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are > the DBus > > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... > > Great. thanks. > > > Can't we just break binary compatibility for 4.10. Just this once? > > @Sebastian: Do you really want to have to deprecate the > QueryServiceClient as mentioned in [1]? I rather not have stuff like > that lying around in Nepomuk2. I'd like to not have to make hasty > decisions right now (before 4.9).
Do you think we will do that change for 4.10? If we wait until K5 we can break as much as we like... > Plus, it's not like you'll have to recompile a lot of stuff. The only > things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are nepomuk-kde-config and > nepomuk-kde-kio. > > [1] http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks > > > hugs and kisses > > /Sune > > > > > On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > >> On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <m...@vhanda.in <mailto:m...@vhanda.in>> > wrote: > >>> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in > >>> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break > a lot of > >>> things. > >> > >> NACK. > >> > >> this is a completely no go. > >> > >> /Sune > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > Vishesh Handa > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > nepo...@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
