Re: xntpd problem

2000-01-24 Thread Chris Watt
At 02:54 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >] server 127.127.1.0 # local clock >] fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 0 I read this, it's "close" but solves the wrong problem. I do have upstream servers available 99% of the time, it's just that whenever a little bit of packet loss

Re: xntpd problem

2000-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:11:48PM -0400, Chris Watt wrote: > At 01:53 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > Buy a GPS receiver and set up your own Stratum 1. :-) > This is not a useful solution because: Well... I was being "partially" facious (note smiley). > 1. The m

Re: xntpd problem

2000-01-24 Thread David E. Lupo
At 02:35 PM 1/24/00 -0400, Chris Watt wrote: >Short question: > How do I make xntpd continue to report itself to clients as a usable >stratum 3 server even when it has lost sync with its stratum 2 references? If you include the following lines in /etc/ntp.conf server 127.127.1.0

Re: xntpd problem

2000-01-24 Thread Chris Watt
At 01:53 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > Buy a GPS receiver and set up your own Stratum 1. :-) This is not a useful solution because: 1. The machine has no free I/O ports or IRQ's thus I would need to buy another computer just to use as an NTP server, throwing out existing

Re: xntpd problem

2000-01-24 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Chris Watt wrote: > Short question: > How do I make xntpd continue to report itself to clients as a usable > stratum 3 server even when it has lost sync with its stratum 2 references? > Longwinded form: > I have a LAN on which only one Linux s

xntpd problem

2000-01-24 Thread Chris Watt
Short question: How do I make xntpd continue to report itself to clients as a usable stratum 3 server even when it has lost sync with its stratum 2 references? Longwinded form: I have a LAN on which only one Linux system is connected to the Internet (I know how to setup an IP-Masq