Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
Hello,
I use one version of kernel sources but will compile different instances
of the kernel and of the modules.
So I will have a module directory /lib/modules/2.4.20 and a
module-directory /lib/modules/2.4.20-b belonging to the second compiled
kernel.
How can I tell l
Hello,
I use one version of kernel sources but will compile different instances
of the kernel and of the modules.
So I will have a module directory /lib/modules/2.4.20 and a
module-directory /lib/modules/2.4.20-b belonging to the second compiled
kernel.
How can I tell lilo that the second comp
Try "uname -a" from command line.
-Sameer
- Original Message -
From: "Redhat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: kernel version from command line?
> Also, how do I find out what kernel ve
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 02:35:19PM -0700, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
Just to be different...
cat /proc/version
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador P
to get just what you need... 'uname -r'
On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 17:35 America/New_York, Redhat wrote:
Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
the command line?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailma
Type uname -r at the terminal.
That will give you the kernel version.
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:35, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
--
Vince Parsons, Independent Contractor/Consultant
RHCE 807001402402771
704.83
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
>
>
Run "uname -a"
Rgds
Rus Foster
--
w: http://www.jvds.com | Linux + FreeBSD VDS's from $15/mo
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Totally Customizable
try uname -a
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:35, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
--
Aly S.P Dharshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Southern Alberta Digital Library P
Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
the command line?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Steve wrote:
> How does the redhat kernel version compare with the kernel.org
> version? ie:
> What redhat version is the same as kernel.org 2.4.21?
>
> Regards
> Steve
The RH packaged versions are very patched and customized to work well
with the rest of the RH distro. That b
How does the redhat kernel version compare with the kernel.org version?
ie:
What redhat version is the same as kernel.org 2.4.21?
Regards
Steve
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 20:53, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> Gordon,
>
> *heh* I think you are right - I have been using the 2.4.19 kernel w/
> 7.3 since it was released. I compiled with gcc-2.96 w/ rh73, and I
> don't think that I changed it when I upgraded to 8.0. So sorry, and I
> will try a gc
try uname -a
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Avinash Gowda wrote:
> Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2. I have the
>source RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10. But when I install the rpm's
>they are installed as 2.4.7. The question is which version does
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 22:25, Avinash Gowda wrote:
> Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2. I have the
>source RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10. But when I install the rpm's
>they are installed as 2.4.7. The question is which version does RH7.2 come wit
gt; is which version does RH7.2 come with. Is it 2.4.7-10 or 2.4.7.
> I would really appreciate any response in this regard.
The kernel version is 2.4.7 .
The release number of the rpm is 10 .
This gives you the rpm kernel-2.4.7-10
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[E
Is it 2.4.7-10 or 2.4.7. I would
AG> really appreciate any response in this regard. TIA
It's kernel version 2.4.7. The "-10" means that it's revision 10 of the RPMs
used for the kernel. This changes because RH distrbutes a customized
version of the kernel. Their 2.4.7
Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2. I have the source
RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10. But when I install the rpm's they are
installed as 2.4.7. The question is which version does RH7.2 come with. Is it 2.4.7-10
or 2.4.7. I would really appreciate
Hi,
I have the following setup:
(eth1) x.y.z.10 x.y.z.20
Linux-Host
The Linux PC and the host are having the above mentioned IP addresses. Now,
I wanted to do proxy arp for the IP address x.y.z.15.
I added a proxy ARP entry on Linu
>
> kernel-2.4.9-34 IS the latest kernel released for Red Hat 7.2
But the latest stable is 2.4.18 until now,
Do we expect to be the kernel for 8.0 ?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 08:28 pm, Josepablo Pérez wrote:
> Gretings,
>
> Iam on Red Hat Linux 7.2, I did up2date --configure and made sure that
> the kernel wasn´t going to be ignored. I executed up2date -u and the
> updates were made, however the k
Hi all,
I'm trying to connect an Intel IBM server with Red Hat 7.2 to an EMC
Symmetrix 3830 box but EMC only support Red Hat 7.2 with kernel
2.4.9-31, and I'm currently running kernel 2.4.7-10.
Would anybody tell me how can find and I install the desired (2.4.9-31)
kernel in my system ?
Thank's
> Can anybody please guide me as to which kernel version is the
> most stable one ? As I can see that there are lots of versions available
on the
> web
> but .. what should be the compromise ?How to select the kernel version
> acccording to
> specific requirement...?
Use up2da
Placed At :
Can anybody please guide me as to which kernel version is the
most stable one ? As I can see that there are lots of versions available on the
web
but .. what should be the compromise ?How to select the kernel version
acccording to
Hi all.
I'm running redhat 6.1 (cartman) on a i586 arch for my firewall/masq
server.
Now, I want to upgrade my kernel version because I want to replace
ipchains with iptables. I've downloaded kernel 2.4.18 and, first of
all, i read Documentation/Changes. Obiously, i have to upgrade som
** Reply to message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) on Fri, 08 Feb 2002
12:48:55 -0500
> Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The 2.5.x series are TEST kernels for the new 2.6.x series coming late
> > this year, or early next year. Unless you are in the kernel de
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:29:54PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > My current kernel version
Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Admittedly, I comfortably follow your advice, Trond, and use the Red Hat
> released kernels, and promote the same usage pattern for those I consult
> with.
>
> However, I also admit my discomfort in vendor-specific kernels. My techie
> desires are
Admittedly, I comfortably follow your advice, Trond, and use the Red Hat
released kernels, and promote the same usage pattern for those I consult
with.
However, I also admit my discomfort in vendor-specific kernels. My techie
desires are to use the latest (what is it now, 2.4.18?) stock kernels
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> My current kernel version is 2.4.9-6. The latest version in the
> redhat update agent is 2.4.9-19. the latest vesion in the www.kernel.org
> is 2.5.3. If I use 2.5.3, will it cause some problems?
2.5.3 is bleeding edge
08, 2002 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel version
My current kernel version is 2.4.9-6. The latest version in the
redhat update agent is 2.4.9-19. the latest vesion in the www.kernel.org
is 2.5.3. If I use 2.5.3, will it cause some problems?
Jian
Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 2.5.x series are TEST kernels for the new 2.6.x series coming late
> this year, or early next year. Unless you are in the kernel developer's
> type guild, you shouldn't mess with the 2.5.x kernels. Stay with the
> latest in the 2.4.x series.
t; My current kernel version is 2.4.9-6. The latest version in the
> redhat update agent is 2.4.9-19. the latest vesion in the www.kernel.org
> is 2.5.3. If I use 2.5.3, will it cause some problems?
>
>
> Jianping Zhu
> Department of Computer
My current kernel version is 2.4.9-6. The latest version in the
redhat update agent is 2.4.9-19. the latest vesion in the www.kernel.org
is 2.5.3. If I use 2.5.3, will it cause some problems?
Jianping Zhu
Department of Computer Science
Univerity of Georgia
At 06:10 PM 9/04/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>I'm about to install a new server, and am also going to attempt to compile
>my very first kernel. Since this is going to be a production server for my
>tiny hosting company, I want utmost stability (over and above all else). I
>don't use funny hardware,
At 4/10/01 09:00 AM -0500, you wrote:
>I'm assumeing this is a web server serveing http. So the only servies
>running IMHO be http(apache sounds good) and ssh(for remote admin.)
Well, as a tiny hosting company I now have *everything* running on one
server (except ns2 and logging). I'm looking
If you have a VIA chipset in some cases it cause total file system coruption(not a
good thing:/). it's _supposed_ to be fixed in 2.4.3, you're choice as to test it or
not.
I say monolithic simply because of security, no LKM, no LKM backdoors. plus on a
server there really is no reason to ha
At 4/10/01 07:41 AM -0500, you wrote:
>If it's a hosting company i'd say 2.4.2, it's networking layer is FAR
>better than 2.2.x and i've been running it for a while and all seams well,
>as long as you don't have a VIA chip set:cP
>also that raid stuff seams much faster
This is *exactly* the typ
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:24:23PM -0300, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> I'm about to install a new server, and am also going to attempt to compile
> my very first kernel. Since this is going to be a production server for my
> tiny hosting company, I want utmost stability (over and above all else). I
At 4/9/01 05:04 PM -0500, you wrote:
>The latest: 2.4.3 (or 2.4.2 if you'd rather)
"The latest" is usually still at 99%, which is why I asked. "The
next-to-latest" is usually what one wants for stability, much as I now buy
Athlon 1.0GHz processors instead of 1.3GHz since they've become insanely
At 06:24 PM 4/9/2001 -0300, you wrote:
>I'm about to install a new server, and am also going to attempt to compile my very
>first kernel. Since this is going to be a production server for my tiny hosting
>company, I want utmost stability (over and above all else). I don't use funny
>hardware, I
I'm about to install a new server, and am also going to attempt to compile
my very first kernel. Since this is going to be a production server for my
tiny hosting company, I want utmost stability (over and above all else). I
don't use funny hardware, I don't use X, and I don't have the money fo
A revision/release point. Sort of a subrelease.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Tally Jones wrote:
> The kernel version like 2.0.34 (came from redhat 5.1)
>
> kernel version (2.2.14-5.0) that comes with redhat
> 6.2, what is 5.0 here ?
>
> ___
The kernel version like 2.0.34 (came from redhat 5.1)
kernel version (2.2.14-5.0) that comes with redhat
6.2, what is 5.0 here ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Charles Galpin spewed into the bitstream:
CG>Can anyone tell me the difference (or point me to a writeup) between the
CG>kernels with the acX extension, and those without?
CG>
CG>I'm assuming it stands for Alan Cox, but why are there two, and what is
CG>the difference, and wh
Can anyone tell me the difference (or point me to a writeup) between the
kernels with the acX extension, and those without?
I'm assuming it stands for Alan Cox, but why are there two, and what is
the difference, and which should we use? I'm considering a 2.4 upgrade to
my RH7.0 machines.
thanks
h
>> 2.2.17, and want to run this binary on an i486 with 2.2.14, what must
>> I do? 'man gcc' suggests that the -b option is relevant, but it also
>> says "This is useful when you have installed GNU CC as a
>> cross-compiler", suggesting that th
sting that there is some other configuration to
> be done to gcc before I should try that ... and that doesn't address
> the issue of kernel version.
>
> Similarly, if I'm compiling someone else's source on the
> aforementioned i686 and I want the binary to be optim
the -b option is relevant, but it also
says "This is useful when you have installed GNU CC as a
cross-compiler", suggesting that there is some other configuration to
be done to gcc before I should try that ... and that doesn't address
the issue of kernel version.
Similarly, if I&
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RH6.1 kernel version?
>> What is the Linux kernel version that ships with RH6.1 and RH6.2?
>>
>6.1 had 2.2.12, and 6.2 has 2.2.14
Thanks for the response. I was afraid of that. Now I have to chan
RedHat released 2.2.16 for both 6.1 and 6.2. See RedHat errata
web page.
-Connie Sieh
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> >> What is the Linux kernel version that ships with RH6.1 and RH6.2?
> >>
> >6.1 had 2.
>> What is the Linux kernel version that ships with RH6.1 and RH6.2?
>>
>6.1 had 2.2.12, and 6.2 has 2.2.14
Thanks for the response. I was afraid of that. Now I have to change the
kernel manually because of this:
http://www.sendmail.org/sendmail.8.10.1.LINUX-SECURIT
Vidiot wrote:
>
> I'm not at home to go digging into the system real easy, so I figured I
> would just ask.
>
> What is the Linux kernel version that ships with RH6.1 and RH6.2?
>
6.1 had 2.2.12, and 6.2 has 2.2.14
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
I'm not at home to go digging into the system real easy, so I figured I
would just ask.
What is the Linux kernel version that ships with RH6.1 and RH6.2?
Thanks.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart: Hey, why is it destroying other toys? Lisa: They must have
programmed
The changelog has these additional entries:
* Mon Jun 19 2000 Michael K. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- added davem's sparc syncdma patch
- fixed /usr/include/* symlinks with triggerun
- added bcrl's raw-fixup2 patch
* Sun Jun 18 2000 Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- workaround to build on spar
Right, I d/l'ed the kernel source for 2.2.16-1 from Rawhide and rolled my
own, optimised kernel from that.
This morning, I see an RHSA message about kernel 2.2.16-3 being available.
So... what's the difference between -1 and -3, anyone?
--
Regards,
Juha
PGP fingerprint:
79E9 87B0 2A5C 335C
> I see all of you exchanging info with version of the kernel. Can I know how
> to find out the version
uname -r
cat /proc/version
rpm -q kernel
> and also how to rebuild a new version. I am using RH 6.0.
> Also let me know where to download the new version if available.
Latest kernel source:
f
Ops, I meant kernel version not kernel source. Also on a how to, check the
readme after you gunzip and untar the package. Also follow the instructions
that Matthew Saltzman placed in this URL:
ftp.math.clemson.edu/users/mjs/Linux/Redhat-6.1-custom-kernel.txt
Don't hesitate to ask if you
Rajagopal:
I can't remember the exact command to get the kernel source but do this:
look in your /usr/src/ directory. There your will see a symlink linux and
the kernel version. The stock version for 6.0 is 2.2.5-15 so that is
probably what you have. I still thing the 2.2.14 version is
Dear All:
I see all of you exchanging info with version of the kernel. Can I know how
to find out the version and also how to rebuild a new version. I am using RH
6.0. Also let me know where to download the new version if available.
Subash
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Warning: /boot/System.map has an incorrect kernel version
> Isn't there usually a System.map file in the
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/ dir?
/usr/src/linux actually. I usually cp it to
/boot/System.map- and then link System.map to it
I just recompiled kernel 2.2.13 and while booting it gave the error
message:
Warning: /boot/System.map has an incorrect kernel version
it also did this while attempting to use ps.
Isn't there usually a System.map file in the
/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/ dir?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
>2.0.34 is the lastest stable version.it was just released afew days ago
>and I have had no problems with it at all.
2.0.29 was lauded as a most stable kernel. However, a number of serious
security problems (F00F on pentia and other DoS attacks) have rendered it
unsafe for non-standalone syst
0600, you wrote:
>Hello,
> Can some one tell what is a really good Kernel version? I want to
>recompile my kernel to include PPP so I might as well use a decent kernel.
>Thanks.
>
>David
>
>--
>Re
Hello,
Can some one tell what is a really good Kernel version? I want to
recompile my kernel to include PPP so I might as well use a decent kernel.
Thanks.
David
--
Rest in natural great peace
This exhausted mind
64 matches
Mail list logo
