On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 08:02, Ben Russo wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:02, lester lasad wrote:
> > Thanks for the responses. Regarding the name resolution is it looking
> > for itself, the local machine? The command below "iptables -L-n -V"
> > just lists the version of iptables, nothing else.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:21:53 -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:51:51PM -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> > Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30
> > seconds load a page. With iptables off it's immediate.
>
>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:51:51PM -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30 seconds
> load a page. With iptables off it's immediate.
You are not blocking localhost connections are you? Just a thought ...
I don't know what that would do, but worth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Dec 2002 12:51:51 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30
> seconds load a page. With iptables off it's immediate.
>
> Same with applications in x windows. With iptables loaded xterm takes
>
Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30 seconds
load a page. With iptables off it's immediate.
Same with applications in x windows. With iptables loaded xterm takes 15
seconds to load, while it load immediately with iptables either unloaded
or the rules flushed.
My /etc/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Dec 2002 07:42:30 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> Hi Bret. Yes that is the same thread. Slowness when doing -L just
> seems to be a symptom of the same problem. Anyone else have any
> information that might help?
"iptables -L" does DNS lookups whil
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:02, lester lasad wrote:
> Thanks for the responses. Regarding the name resolution is it looking
> for itself, the local machine? The command below "iptables -L-n -V"
> just lists the version of iptables, nothing else. Doing "iptables
> -nL" gave a much quicker response.
Hi Bret. Yes that is the same thread. Slowness when doing -L just seems
to be a symptom of the same problem. Anyone else have any information
that might help?
Thanks,
James
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 23:09, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 21:12, James Pifer wrote:
> > Anyone else have anyth
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 21:12, James Pifer wrote:
> Anyone else have anything to add to this or can anyone give more detail
> on how this is a DNS issue? I have a very similar problem as the
> original poster.
>
If this is the thread I respondeed to, I thought his issue was that the
-L was taking a
Anyone else have anything to add to this or can anyone give more detail
on how this is a DNS issue? I have a very similar problem as the
original poster.
I have two Redhat 8.0 machines, one has this same problem while the
other one does not. Both have the same DNS settings, ie they hit the
same DN
Thanks for the responses. Regarding the name resolution is it looking for itself, the local machine? The command below "iptables -L-n -V" just lists the version of iptables, nothing else. Doing "iptables -nL" gave a much quicker response.
The main problem is that everything is slow after loadi
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 05:59:23AM -0800, lester lasad wrote:
>
> I am running redhat 7.3 everything is working properly until loading the iptables
>rules. After loading the rules I am taking a big performance hit. It can take
>anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to display the result
iptables -L will try to reverse resolve IPs to FQDNs...you're probably
seeing a delay due to the DNS query time outs.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, lester lasad wrote:
>
> I am running redhat 7.3 everything is working properly until loading the iptables
>rules. After loading the rules I am taking a b
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 07:59, lester lasad wrote:
>
> I am running redhat 7.3 everything is working properly until loading the iptables
>rules. After loading the rules I am taking a big performance hit. It can take
>anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to display the results of "iptable
I am running redhat 7.3 everything is working properly until loading the iptables rules. After loading the rules I am taking a big performance hit. It can take anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to display the results of "iptables -L". This wasn't happening prior to the rules being loa
15 matches
Mail list logo
