On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 06:44, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
> > Go to the taroon-beta-list.
>
> Or try the redhat beta list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
Nope, taroon. The (former) redhat-beta list is for the (former) RHL
be
Hi Peter,
Ed Wilts wrote:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
> Go to the taroon-beta-list.
Or try the redhat beta list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Bye,
Leonard.
--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo!
End all weapons of mass destruction
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 09:56:03PM -0400, Peter Larsen wrote:
> Hello hello,
> Looking at Redhat's support site I didn't find any listservs for the Beta
> versions of AS 3.0 (Taroon). I'm taking a peek, but as usual find myself
> running into issues that I would like to share/talk about to find sol
Hello hello,
Looking at Redhat's support site I didn't find any listservs for the Beta
versions of AS 3.0 (Taroon). I'm taking a peek, but as usual find myself
running into issues that I would like to share/talk about to find solutions.
Anyone have clues where to direct issues about AS 3.0 BETA ?
stand,
allow one to essentially divide up the powers that are traditionally
granted to root with added security mechanisms. However, I do not
believe that these are found in any of the "main stream" Linux
releases.
As to why root is a member of all those groups ... It's a myst
;t get a prompt from assuming any identity
even if it's that of a group where he has no membership.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Nathan ViswaNathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Where can I get info on groups li
Message: 17
Subject: Re: Any old timers here ? root's groups question...
From: Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 02 Jul 2003 09:32:04 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 08:51, Greg Hosler wrote:
> I'm teaching RH033 this week,
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 08:51, Greg Hosler wrote:
> I'm teaching RH033 this week, and thought I could handle anything that would
> get thrown at me.
>
> Then one student noticed that root is a member of the following groups:
>
> root bin daemon sys adm disk wheel
I'm teaching RH033 this week, and thought I could handle anything that would
get thrown at me.
Then one student noticed that root is a member of the following groups:
root bin daemon sys adm disk wheel
and they asked the (what seems to me to be) obvious question: Why is root i
some Unix
protocols like NFS are even further limited; NFSv3 allows only 16 groups.
I believe that contrary to what's been said, the limitation exists only
in the kernel. 2.6 will have a dynamically sized group set, so it won't
suffer this limitation. However, some limitations will
y
> and it will be unreadable by others. The setfacl command then gives
> apache read access to those directories. After that, remove apache
from
> all the extra groups.
it seems that redhat removed acl support from the kernel. The
Changelog says:
12-AUG-02
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PR
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:58:27 +0200
"Denis Jacobi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cliff Wells wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > > Cliff Wells wrote:
--->snip
>
> :-) I thought I descriebed the problem pretty good using Bob and
> Emma.
>
> Well, sadly there is a more se
-R -m u:apache:r
on the virtual host directories. The user will then own the directory
and it will be unreadable by others. The setfacl command then gives
apache read access to those directories. After that, remove apache from
all the extra groups.
There might be an apache/chroot solution to t
Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
> > >
> > > However, consider the pros and cons:
> > >
> > > Firing Bob:
> > > - Easy.
> > > - Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:10, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > Since we're finally bringing this out in the open, I have to admit I
> > never liked Bob anyway. I think his "needing access" to Emma's files is
> > just a ploy to get close to her. Tha
Jeff Kinz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while you sea
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:10, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> It's getting obvious we're talking about Microsoft Bob here. The last I
> heard, he was a felon wanted in 36 states. Dead or Alive. Preferably
> dead.
But only 32 states are actually aware of it...
--
David Hollister
Furthurnet - Free, legal P
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:04, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > Since we're finally bringing this out in the open, I have to admit I
> > never liked Bob anyway. I think his "needing access" to Emma's files is
> > just a ploy to get close to her. Th
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
> > >
> > > However, consider the pros and cons:
> > >
> > > Firing Bob:
> > > - Easy.
> > > - Indicates a decisive n
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > Firing Bob:
> > > - Easy.
> > > - Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
> > >
> > > Working around group limit:
> > > - Hard.
> > > - Will ma
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> Cliff Wells wrote:
> > Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
> >
> > However, consider the pros and cons:
> >
> > Firing Bob:
> > - Easy.
> > - Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
> >
> > Working around group limit:
> > - Har
Cliff Wells wrote:
Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
However, consider the pros and cons:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while you search for a solution.
Also, you should try to focus
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 12:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:22:32PM +0200, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> > I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
> > have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
> > another group
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:22:32PM +0200, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
> have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
> another group (emma) and added the user (bob) to the group emma. Bob
> shou
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 12:22, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
> have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
> another group (emma) and added the user (bob) to the group emma. Bob
> sho
Hi,
I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
another group (emma) and added the user (bob) to the group emma. Bob
should now be able to read files where group emma has read permission
on. The probl
Hello,
I am setting up CVS and would like to have a set of environment variables
set and exported for a given group (my cvs group).
I know that putting variables in /etc/profile will make vars. available
globally, and I know that using id -G will tell me what groups a user
belongs to.
Thinking
Daniel Rubin,
On Wednesday February 26, 2003 12:55, Daniel Rubin wrote:
> I'm running RH 8.0 and want to modify the primary &
> secondary group memberships of the apache user. But
> the apache user doesn't show up in the users & groups
> applet. I know apache
I'm running RH 8.0 and want to modify the primary &
secondary group memberships of the apache user. But
the apache user doesn't show up in the users & groups
applet. I know apache user exists because the applet
doesn't let me create anither user called apache. So
how do I
Hello redhat-list,
I have a lot of virtue domain on my server and each of those web
sites have a number of users. I am trying to figure out the best way
to handle groups for these users. each domain needs to have all its
users plus all the web pages and emails listed under the same group so
that
sernames and group names. This is for compadiblity.
Also most systems do not allow a user to join more then 16
groups, though some permit 32(haven't seen one that does
more then 32 recently). Much of it I think is legacy
limits from long ago that have just stuck around. Linux
is much more flexib
I encountered a problem with long group names
on a redhat linux system recently. I saw the
same behavior on Redhat 7.2, 8.0.
It looks like there is a 16 character limit when using
/usr/sbin/groupadd and /usr/sbin/grpchk
But no such limit occurs with /usr/sbin/useradd
For example, when using usera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:46 pm, Flávio wrote:
> Dear Bret
>
> Thank you for your information. Did you know what characters they use,
> like below? 1, { ? @
>
> Example:
>
> 1 Sound and Multimedia Support {
If sound and media support is selected.
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Em
nome de Bret Hughes
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 1 de agosto de 2002 22:18
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: Package Groups
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 19:55, Flávio wrote:
> Dear List
>
>
> Which RPMs are install
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 19:55, Flávio wrote:
> Dear List
>
>
> Which RPMs are installed under the various package groups in 7.3? Base,
> Printing Support,Classic X Windows, Laptop, Gnome, KDE ... (Custom Install).
>
> Thanks
>
in the install tree (cd or whatever)check
Dear List
Which RPMs are installed under the various package groups in 7.3? Base,
Printing Support,Classic X Windows, Laptop, Gnome, KDE ... (Custom Install).
Thanks
Flávio
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version
Finally I got this to work. After trying several different things I have
gotten my user in more than 32 groups. They can now belong to 256
groups. I had to do some recompiles.
1. Downloaded Kernel Source - I am still running 2.4.9 with xfs patch.
2. edit the limits.h file in kernel source
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:43:42PM +0700, Kevin Myers wrote:
> On 16 Jul 2002 09:59:29 -0500, Matthew wrote:
>
> >I am having a limitations problem with groups.
>
> What is it that you are trying to achieve? Perhaps there is another way of
> approaching it?
I'm ha
On 16 Jul 2002 09:59:29 -0500, Matthew wrote:
>
>I am having a limitations problem with groups.
What is it that you are trying to achieve? Perhaps there is another way of
approaching it?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16:15 16 Jul 2002, Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 16-Jul-2002/09:59 -0500, Matthew Dodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >I am having a limitations problem with groups.
| >The problem is I have a user account that needs to belong to about 50
| >groups.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-Jul-2002/09:59 -0500, Matthew Dodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I am having a limitations problem with groups.
>
>The problem is I have a user account that needs to belong to about 50
>groups. I seem to be running into
I am having a limitations problem with groups.
The problem is I have a user account that needs to belong to about 50
groups. I seem to be running into a 32 group limitation, I add the user
to all the groups in the /etc/groups file but when I run the
/usr/bin/groups command the user is only in
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 13:58, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> If I do the following:
>
> groupadd test
> gpasswd test
> # enter "testing" as the password
>
> why can't unpriveleged users use newgrp and the password to gain access to
> the group? Is newgrp broken somehow?
Add the users
If I do the following:
groupadd test
gpasswd test
# enter "testing" as the password
why can't unpriveleged users use newgrp and the password to gain access to
the group? Is newgrp broken somehow?
--
"The only thing that helps me maintain my slender grip on reality is t
> "Simon" == Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> Hello, I recently noticed a few problems with file permissions of
Simon> the dev package, I think due to another package which had modified
Simon> them.
Simon> How can I see the file permissions and ownergroup as recorded by
Simon>
Hello,
I recently noticed a few problems with file permissions of the dev
package, I think due to another package which had modified them.
How can I see the file permissions and ownergroup as recorded by rpm?
Thanks,
Simon
--
Simon J Mudd, Tel: +34-91-408 4878, Mobile: +34-605-085 219
Mad
shared groups (gids) and users (uids) must both be > 500
for any uid/gid that is < 500, the local group/user file is referenced
(/etc/groups, /etc/passwd respectively).
I'll bet that you have gid's < 500
-Greg
On 12-Nov-01 christopher j bottaro wrote:
> a while a go i po
a while a go i posted what i was trying to do and yall told me to use NIS.
so i got it set up and working (well, running at least).
i shared my groups and passwd file, but out of the 5 users, only 2 are shared
properly to my NIS client.
if i log onto my linux box thats running the NIS server
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 02:38:54PM -0600, scott.list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| While on the subject, and since you are working on the chapter, is there a
| way to make all users in one group belong to another group with out
| explicitly adding each of their userids to the other groups l
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, scott.list wrote:
> While on the subject, and since you are working on the chapter, is there a
> way to make all users in one group belong to another group with out
> explicitly adding each of their userids to the other groups line in
> /etc/group?
>
&g
While on the subject, and since you are working on the chapter, is there a
way to make all users in one group belong to another group with out
explicitly adding each of their userids to the other groups line in
/etc/group?
i.e. /etc/group:
users::100:accounting <- this did not work , tried
> not exactly. The idea is to have all personal accounts in their own
> separate groups. This leads to everyone needing a uniq group. and from
> there it was decided that group names follow user names (though it could have
> been something else such as "user: greg, group: grou
On 28-Nov-00 Statux wrote:
> Well, one must always remember how certain distros like to do things:
> UPGs (User Private Groups) as RH and others use will explain the root
> group. The scheme is to have the uid and gid to match and to be called the
> same thing
not exactly. The ide
Well, one must always remember how certain distros like to do things:
UPGs (User Private Groups) as RH and others use will explain the root
group. The scheme is to have the uid and gid to match and to be called the same
thing (of course there are a few exceptions).
Personally, I like the old BSD
November 2000 11:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: root and wheel groups
Hi!
Just a short question. Could anybody tell me what the concept is behind
having both a root and a wheel group? In *BSD the wheel group is what (RH)
linux calls the root group. Why the extra group
Hi!
Just a short question. Could anybody tell me what the concept is behind
having both a root and a wheel group? In *BSD the wheel group is what (RH)
linux calls the root group. Why the extra group?
Bye,
Christopher W Aiken wrote:
>
> I have RH 7.0 both at home and at work. I use "slrn" to
> read several news groups, again both at home and at work.
>
> I had to change ISP's and now I can not read my new ISP's
> news groups from work because they don&#x
and OH area and want more information about
my ISP, feel free to drop me a line.
Michael Stack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Michael R. Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: News
There are other ways to accomplish the same
thing (like a user-authenticated server, which you mentioned already).
Other options probably exist but practicality begins to deteriorate
significantly beyond this point
-m
Christopher W Aiken wrote:
>
> I have RH 7.0 both at home and at work. I
I have RH 7.0 both at home and at work. I use "slrn" to
read several news groups, again both at home and at work.
I had to change ISP's and now I can not read my new ISP's
news groups from work because they don't authenticate users
unless they use a "dial-up-connec
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:19:17PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Gary Nielson wrote:
>
> > I am trying to understand how to deal with users, groups and permissions
> > with directories that are mounted via nfs from a remote server. I am
> > mounting a subdirectory under
Gary Nielson wrote:
> I am trying to understand how to deal with users, groups and permissions
> with directories that are mounted via nfs from a remote server. I am
> mounting a subdirectory under Irix 6.5, using the xfs filesystem, from
> Redhat 6.2.
>
> The uid and gids mea
I am trying to understand how to deal with users, groups and permissions
with directories that are mounted via nfs from a remote server. I am
mounting a subdirectory under Irix 6.5, using the xfs filesystem, from
Redhat 6.2.
The uid and gids mean different things on the remote Irix box, so I am
:
hruser
suser
web
Groups:
hr:x:hr,web
sales:x:suser,web
chgrp sales sales
chgrp hr hr
chmod 2775 sales hr
Done.
--
Jason Costomiris <><
Technologist, cryptogeek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | http://www.jasons.org/
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
pages. what I wanted to do was create a
group for each department's web developers a a group for the company's
webmasters. I was hoping I could simply add the webmaster group to the
department groups allowing each webmaster access to department pages. Any
Ideas how to accomplish?
Thanks,
Ch
ffective group "its" rather
> > than their private group.
>
> I will point out that Linux uses BSD-style
> groups--if you're already in the group in
> /etc/group, then you automatically gain group
> access without having to newgrp.
>
Yes, you are absolutel
.
I will point out that Linux uses BSD-style groups--if you're already in
the group in /etc/group, then you automatically gain group access without
having to newgrp.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
312/315.1075 [home office] || 312
On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Steve Frampton wrote:
>
> I've created this directory. I've created a group in /etc/group called
> "its" as follows:
>
> its:x:499:frampton,mccready
>
> I've done: 'chown frampton.its /archive2/its_share' as well as
> 'chmod a-x,ug+x frampton.its'. I've then created a sy
> Hello:
>
> RedHat uses something called "private groups" to provide a bit more
> flexibility, security-wise. I'm just having trouble figuring out how to
> use it.
>
> What I want to do:
>
> Create a directory, /archive2/its_share, a common area for
Hello:
RedHat uses something called "private groups" to provide a bit more
flexibility, security-wise. I'm just having trouble figuring out how to
use it.
What I want to do:
Create a directory, /archive2/its_share, a common area for our department.
Anybody can put files in
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Chris Frost wrote:
> I'm beginning to setup a cluster here, and most of the nodes will be
> disk-less (and thus nis isn't needed), but for those that will have their
Probably should use it anyway. It keeps your password files organized, it
is better than mounting /etc/passw
Chris Frost wrote:
>
> Also, is nfs much faster in 2.1? This network is going to be loaded w/ nfs
> stuff (seeing as how 10 computers will be disk-less), and I'll need all the
> performance I can get.
Hopefully someone else can be more precise about this, but at the Linux
Expo there was a talk a
I'm beginning to setup a cluster here, and most of the nodes will be
disk-less (and thus nis isn't needed), but for those that will have their
own hd, is nis the best way to have the same users on all machines? Or is
there something better.
Also, is nfs much faster in 2.1? This network is going t
Woody and Graham,
Thanks so much for the help =). The script is now all set up ..
no problems!! Thansk so much =).
Joel
Joel Oliveira
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://morpheus.hartford.edu/cs/student/joliveir
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, E
Edit the group file in your /etc directory, adding the group name of your
choice to the file. Look at the format of the other groups and the user
names with them and add your user names to that group respectively. Once
you have done that, you can simply change the ownership of your script
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 1998 07:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: groups
>
>
>
> i have some programs that i would like only a select few
> people to run,
> and I'm not too familiar with managuing groups and such
> (just yet ;).
> W
i have some programs that i would like only a select few people to run,
and I'm not too familiar with managuing groups and such (just yet ;).
for example:
I have shell script called "blah.sh"
this script is just going to run one of a handful
of programs based on that decisio
Let's say I have a directory and I want to set rw- permission for a group
(G1), ro- for another (G2) but rw for certain files in the directory for
certain users in the second group (G2).
How do I do that ?
Groups contain users, but can they contain other groups ?
Claudiu
--
PLEASE rea
There already is a Linux Users Group. Here's the mailing I just got:
Subject: LUNICS MTG Apr 6
Real-To: Peter Fillingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LOCAL NJ Apr LUNICS Mtg.
The LUNICS [LINUX, UN*X, COHERENT, Free-BSD,AIX,AUX...] SIG [Special
Interest
Group] of the ACGNJ [Amateur Computer Gr
> I live in northern NJ also. I would also be interested in a Linux
> users group. How much work would it be to start one?
Can you represent Toys 'R Us? :)
I think it would be as much work as we wanted to put into it. I think the
linux.org people have created a HOWTO that we should check out
I live in northern NJ also. I would also be interested in a Linux
users group. How much work would it be to start one?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Wreski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 1998 7:56 PM
> To: RedHat
> Subject: New Jer
Hi all. If you're in New Jersey, and know of a Linux Users Group, I'd like to
hear from you.
I'm actually very disappointed. The Trenton Computer Fair, which happens
every year at this time for the last twenty or so years, is an excellent place
to advertise/publicise Linux for free, yet out of
82 matches
Mail list logo
