-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:14:04 -0700, Big Chuck wrote:
> I noticed that when upgrading glibc (I had to downgrade to link some
> legacy code) that it restarted the sshd server. Where exactly was this
> called from? rpm itself or is there a wrapper in t
I noticed that when upgrading glibc (I had to downgrade to link some
legacy code) that it restarted the sshd server. Where exactly was this
called from? rpm itself or is there a wrapper in the mix somewhere or
what? Did Red Hat actually cross-reference new libraries with running
services and de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:54:14, Lancer wrote:
> I have a new install of AS 2.1 which I understand is based on RH 8.0 for RPM
> purposes. I have new RPMs which are dependent on libc.so.6 so I am trying to
> upgrade glibc. As shown below this seems to be
I have a new install of AS 2.1 which I understand is based on RH 8.0 for RPM
purposes. I have new RPMs which are dependent on libc.so.6 so I am trying to
upgrade glibc. As shown below this seems to be a chicken/egg thing. How do I
upgrade glibc?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpms]# uname -a
Linux host 2.4.9-e
I was trying to update my gLibc library last night, due to an
incompatablility with my version(stock lib for RH9) and Mysql, when the rpm
upgrade went sorrow. Unfortunately I have lost all connections to the box.
Is it possible to boot into single user mode and re-compile or replace the
corrupt gL
"Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the upgrades filled the disk? A lot of the programs you
> mention probably need disk space for logs, temp files, etc.
Nope. df gives only about 50% usage on all partitions. I'm suspecting
something about permission handling of the whole system. Ne
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:02:13PM +0700, Kittiwat Manosuthi wrote:
>
> I reapplied tha patches for glibc, bind, and even the kernel.. try
> recompiling daemontool.. and now the box refused to boot! The box is at
> dialtone (not here) so I have to ask them to reboot it--and waiting for the
> res
Hi:
I don't know what I did wrong, but here's the story.
Yesterday, I upgrade BIND, from red hat up2date, and glibc (recent updates)
for my RH7.2 box. The up2date session was interrupted in the middle, or
something like that so I SSHed into the box and ran the up2date script
again. BIND failed t
I tried to upgrade my ucm-snmp package. It requires several other
packages.
One is glibc.2.1.3-15. I have RH 6.1 with glibc-2.1.1-6.
Is it OK to upgrade this with rpm -Uva ?
Any gotchas. It's on a live system I don't want to crash.
Thanks,
Scott
(Excuse this repost if it made it the first
I tried to upgrade my ucm-snmp package. It requires several other packages.
One is glibc.2.1.3-15. I have RH 6.1 with glibc-2.1.1-6.
Is it OK to upgrade this with rpm -Uva ?
Any gotchas. It's on a live system I don't want to crash.
Thanks,
Scott
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[repost, sorry folks.. forgot the subject line the first time.. ]
On monday, as part of my quest for a fix to the BRU/Date problem, I
upgraded my glibc at the suggestion of one of the posts...
glibc-2.0.7-6.i386.rpm
Didn't notice, but shortly thereafter my PAM entries into /var/log/messages
sta
On 9 Apr 1998 09:55:25 -0700, Ed Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Running glibc-2.0.6-9 on an RH 5 system with errata installed. When
>upgrading to any of the new errata rpm's (glibc) including using the
>texinfo upgrade I am
>unable to login without reverting to 2.0.6-9 and texinfo-3.9.7. Error
Running glibc-2.0.6-9 on an RH 5 system with errata installed. When
upgrading to any of the new errata rpm's (glibc) including using the
texinfo upgrade I am
unable to login without reverting to 2.0.6-9 and texinfo-3.9.7. Error
message states incorrect login.
Any ideas?
Thanks
--
PLEASE read
13 matches
Mail list logo
