Re: Difference between gcc and gcc3?

2003-02-15 Thread Felipe Leon
missing dependencies. ... One of the dependencies is gcc3 version >= 3.1 Since you have gcc 3.2 installed already, use 'rpm -i' to install the src.rpm. Then, edit the package's spec file in the SPECS directory, and change that dependency from gcc3 to gcc. Then,

Re: Difference between gcc and gcc3?

2003-02-14 Thread Gordon Messmer
with some missing dependencies. ... > One of the dependencies is gcc3 version >= 3.1 Since you have gcc 3.2 installed already, use 'rpm -i' to install the src.rpm. Then, edit the package's spec file in the SPECS directory, and change that dependency from gcc3 to gcc. Then, build the pa

Difference between gcc and gcc3?

2003-02-14 Thread Felipe Leon
them names of programs I have already installed but with -devel as addition) and everything was ok except for one. One of the dependencies is gcc3 version >= 3.1 I've tried to look for this unsuccessfuly! In the official site of these compiler packages I cannot find such a gcc3 versio

gcc3 and gcc2

2002-11-05 Thread maillist
). any comments from redhat onto that. *) i have a lot of libs compiled with gcc2. if i upgrade onto gcc3 these would break (i would not be able to link against gcc3-binaries). is there a way around this? even if that means to recompile a lot of packages. *) howto identify all libs? is *-devel

RE: gcc3

2002-07-12 Thread Rob Emanuele
Where does RawHide live? ftp server, directory, etc. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ABrady Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gcc3 On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:45:36 -0700 "Rob Ema

Re: gcc3

2002-07-11 Thread ABrady
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:45:36 -0700 "Rob Emanuele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are the Gcc3 packages in Redhat 7.3? They were in 7.2. > > Thanks, > > Rob No. And no. I installed it from Rawhide right after I installed 7.3. I don't know how well it would

gcc3

2002-07-11 Thread Rob Emanuele
Are the Gcc3 packages in Redhat 7.3? They were in 7.2. Thanks, Rob ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Java/gcc3 problem

2001-12-31 Thread Devon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 31 December 2001 03:43 pm, mike wrote: > On Mon, 2001-12-31 at 01:37, Devon wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sunday 30 December 2001 07:43 pm, mike wrote: > > > I have just compiled mozilla/galeon with

Re: Java/gcc3 problem

2001-12-31 Thread mike
On Mon, 2001-12-31 at 01:37, Devon wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 30 December 2001 07:43 pm, mike wrote: > > I have just compiled mozilla/galeon with the new gcc3.1 from rawhide > > and the blackdown plugin has stopped working (moz9.5 still does java) > > >

Re: Java/gcc3 problem

2001-12-30 Thread Devon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 30 December 2001 07:43 pm, mike wrote: > I have just compiled mozilla/galeon with the new gcc3.1 from rawhide > and the blackdown plugin has stopped working (moz9.5 still does java) > > Anyone got any workarounds Sure, compile it with the c

Java/gcc3 problem

2001-12-30 Thread mike
I have just compiled mozilla/galeon with the new gcc3.1 from rawhide and the blackdown plugin has stopped working (moz9.5 still does java) Anyone got any workarounds Also anyone any idea how to get compat-egcs and compat-gcc296 to both install ___ R

Re: GCC3? -- Still Confused

2001-11-28 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:09 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: GCC3? > >"Matthews, Joh

Re: GCC3? -- Still Confused

2001-11-28 Thread Hal Burgiss
> I'd like to know what versions of GCC other people on the list are > using. [hal@feenix hal]$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98) Hmmm [hal@feenix hal]$ rpm -q --last gcc gcc-2.96-98

RE: GCC3? -- Still Confused

2001-11-28 Thread Matthews, John
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:09 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: GCC3? >"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I was under the assumption that GC

Re: GCC3?

2001-11-26 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was under the assumption that GCC 3.0.2 or GCC 2.95.3 would be the > best bets for stability. I thought that the use of GCC 2.96 was > discouraged. The other way round. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ___

RE: GCC3?

2001-11-26 Thread Matthews, John
] Subject: Re: GCC3? "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone installed gcc3 from rawhide on a 7.1 system yet? Any > caveats, broken bones, beheading...anything? gcc 3 is known to have a few problems, it's there for ones wanting to experiment.

Re: GCC3?

2001-11-26 Thread Wally Brock
no problems here :-) Wally Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > Has anyone installed gcc3 from rawhide on a 7.1 system yet? Any > caveats, broken bones, beheading...anything? > > -- > H | "Life is the art of drawing without an era

GCC3?

2001-11-24 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Has anyone installed gcc3 from rawhide on a 7.1 system yet? Any caveats, broken bones, beheading...anything? -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner + Ashley M. Kirchner <