On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> mentioned previously are an issue to me, I find Exim a decent easy to
> configure, small, fast and feature-ful application. Its is the default
> on Debian although I feel that RedHat ought to include it in their
> distro, I am quite for it.
They do. I
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> I think that Qmail maybe secure but its a stagnant application. It has to
> be patched to get various things to work, I don't know about Postfix its
> used by a number of persons, when I looked at it last when choosing
> there wasn't any LDAP fea
Hello,
>
> qmail is probably the most secure, followed closely by postfix. Sendmail
> is still very popular, though, because it offers more features than any
> other MTA. Like anything else, though, there's a tradeoff between features
> and security.
>
I think that Qmail maybe secur
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Arman Magluyan wrote:
> Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more
> secure (sendmail, qmail, etc) ? I would like to setup my own mail
> server, with DSL connection and I would host 2 domain. Can I just use 1
> mail server for these 2 domain ?
qmail i
This is *not* an answer only to the people quoted here, but also to
all posters in this thread, and to the rest of the world :) ...
On Aug 25, 2002, 21:38 (-0700) Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 20:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
> >
> > You can believe the people who run their own e-mail at h
On 25 Aug 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 18:55, Arman Magluyan wrote:
> > Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
> > (sendmail, qmail, etc) ?
>
> Secure, as in the principle of least privileges, is something that
> sendmail has never been,
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:22:49PM -0700 or thereabouts, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 22:01, Gary wrote:
> >
> > Ed, I would like to add that the millions of mail each day from yahoo is
> > run by qmail, so is the SMPT of hotmail
>
> I don't believe that's true any more. Hotmai
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 22:01, Gary wrote:
>
> Ed, I would like to add that the millions of mail each day from yahoo is
> run by qmail, so is the SMPT of hotmail
I don't believe that's true any more. Hotmail is now run on Windows
2000 with some MTA that doesn't properly implement the SMTP spec.
Qmail is definitely a nice program. It would clearly have more people
using it if it had an "open source" license. As it is, you can't
distribute precompiled versions of qmail that have any changes without
the author's permission...which is something Red Hat and the other
distributions can't liv
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:33:05PM -0500 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:55:13PM -0700, Arman Magluyan wrote:
> > Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
> > (sendmail, qmail, etc) ? I would like to setup my own mail server, with DSL
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 20:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> You can believe the people who run their own e-mail at home on Postfix
> or qmail, or you can listen to the many corporations that rely on
> their business e-mail going through sendmail.
OR, you can listen to the large security community which w
Hello,
My fav must be Exim, default on debian has lot to offer, check it out,
http://www.exim.org, our university swapped over to it for all mail
services, ahem that would exclude the CS department ofcourse.
Cheers,
Aly.
--
Aly Dharshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Admin
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:33:05PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> Do a Google search on "Postfix security" and look at the discovered
> holes and the developer denial - the link is entitled "Postfix
google/linux doesn't have this AFAICT. Just some mailing list banter
about supposed design flaws in pos
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 18:55, Arman Magluyan wrote:
> Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
> (sendmail, qmail, etc) ?
Secure, as in the principle of least privileges, is something that
sendmail has never been, and is never likely to be. Qmail adheres very
str
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:33:05PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> The company I work for runs its e-mail through sendmail for about
> 5,000 employees. So does Red Hat, Sun, IBM, Ford and GM and many,
> many others, from small home sites like mine to large enterprises,
> universities, and governments
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:55:13PM -0700, Arman Magluyan wrote:
> Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
> (sendmail, qmail, etc) ? I would like to setup my own mail server, with DSL
> connection and I would host 2 domain. Can I just use 1 mail server for these
Personally, I use Q-Mail for my mail server. It support multiple domains
and is very secure. It also has a GREAT list of features and you can use
Webmin to administrate it. Took me about 1/2 hour to set it up...
I also have a DSL connection and host mail for several friends. I have
also set up P
- Original Message -
From: "Arman Magluyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:55 AM
Subject: Email question
> Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
> (sendmail, qmail, etc) ?
At 06:55 PM 8/25/02 -0700, Arman Magluyan wrote:
http://www.postfix.org
>Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
>(sendmail, qmail, etc) ? I would like to setup my own mail server, with
>DSL connection and I would host 2 domain. Can I just use 1 mail
Anybody on this list has any suggestion, which mail server is more secure
(sendmail, qmail, etc) ? I would like to setup my own mail server, with DSL
connection and I would host 2 domain. Can I just use 1 mail server for these
2 domain ?
___
I have two servers that can recieve email.
one can reive email with
MX record of 1 and the other of 10.
sometimes email goest to the other server.
how do i then append those email to the
users email on the main server?
so that nothing looks interrupted by the
users. Due to some cercumstances,
th
21 matches
Mail list logo
