Around Mon,Sep 16 2002, at 09:30, Patrick Beart, wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm setting up a new Web and mail server for a Web site
> hosting operation. Security is paramount to my partitioning scheme
> for the hard disk. Therefore, I'm not going with the default Red Hat
> partitioning. I'm d
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 at 9:30pm (-0700), Patrick Beart wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm setting up a new Web and mail server for a Web site
> hosting operation. Security is paramount to my partitioning scheme
> for the hard disk. Therefore, I'm not going with the default Red Hat
> partitioning. I'
Hi Mitchell,
Luke wrote:
> / (1st Primary)
>
> /tmp (3rd Primary)
> /home (4th Primary)
If you only want to use the 4 primary partitions instead of an extended
partition containing multiple logical partitions, I would suggest you change
the third partition to /var, and mak
My suggestion (without long boring technical reasons, like
phyiscal geometrical proximity):
/ (1st Primary)
/tmp (3rd Primary)
/home (4th Primary)
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Mitchell K. Smith wrote:
> Greetings.
> I will be setting up an HP Netserver with an 18GB raid 5 using RH 7.0.
> Can someon
Greetings.
I will be setting up an HP Netserver with an 18GB raid 5 using RH 7.0.
Can someone offer suggestions on the most efficient way to partition the
drive.
The server will be used for an Apache (Stronghold) web server, Anon. FTP
server, Samba server, NFS server and a DNS server.
I was thinki
Quoting Jeff Hogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: disk partitioning
>
>Since I
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: disk partitioning
>
>Since I've received no responses, I guess there
>isn't a way around it with d
using parted might be another posbility also.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/gnuparted/?highlight=parted
eric
>
> Since I've received no responses, I guess there
> isn't a way around it with diskdruid.
>
> kelly
>
> Quoting Kelly Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Thanks ken,
>
>But I state
diskdruid will give you less control than fdisk. It usually forces it to
the end of the disk... nothing you can do. I don't advise that you put
swap at the beginning of the disk, since if you're using an x86, you
better have yerself a /boot partition (if you're using an IDE disk) at the
beginning
Since I've received no responses, I guess there
isn't a way around it with diskdruid.
kelly
Quoting Kelly Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks ken,
But I stated that I already know how to accomplish
this with fdisk. My question is concerning
diskdruid.
kelly
Quo
Thanks ken,
But I stated that I already know how to accomplish
this with fdisk. My question is concerning
diskdruid.
kelly
Quoting kf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You can do this with "fdisk [device_name]". See man fdisk. You have to
know the math of disk geometry to use this.
Disk
You can do this with "fdisk [device_name]". See man fdisk. You have to
know the math of disk geometry to use this.
Disk Druid is pretty smart about knowing where to put partitions. Unless
you've read the docs (and even if you have), it'll be a bit more complex
to use fdisk.
hth,
kf
--
My r
I'm installing Red Hat as the only OS. In
partitioning my disk, I want to put the swap
partition physically near the outside of the disk.
I can see how fdisk will let me do this but
diskdruid didn't work the way I intended.
With diskdruid the swap partition was the first
one I created, but it en
ECTED]]
Enviado el: Jueves, 03 de Febrero de 2000 06:51 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: Quick disk partitioning question
Can you unspecify it in Linuxconf or something? I'm thinking I'd like to
play around with Beos a bit, but Linux and Windows seem to have con
ftware
in Linux, but I've never used it, and am not sure how well it would
work...
Bill Ward
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 7:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil
Subject: Re: Qui
: Jueves, 03 de Febrero de 2000 06:58 a.m.
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Quick disk partitioning question
>
> Just a quick one: What does the option 'grow to fill disk' mean in the
> RedHat partitioning tool? Do I need to check it??
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tob
Being sincere, I haven´t noticed that. I usually mark my swap partitions as
grow to full disk, and space is distributed on same quantities, as I make
usually same size swap parts.
-Manuel.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Is it basically random as to which (if more than one are specified), or is
there a method to its madness?
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Antonio Camacho Quesada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 9:50 am
Subject: RE: Quick disk
ra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Quick disk partitioning question
Just a quick one: What does the option 'grow to fill disk' mean in the
RedHat partitioning tool? Do I need to check it??
Thanks,
Toby.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subjec
Just a quick one: What does the option 'grow to fill disk' mean in the
RedHat partitioning tool? Do I need to check it??
Thanks,
Toby.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
20 matches
Mail list logo
