i'm trying to clarify the numerous ways to invoke bash --
login vs non-login shell, interactive vs non-interactive --
the implications this has for startup files and so on.
first, is there any more comprehensible explanation
than the man page? i mean, the man page is all right,
b
Hi, I am working on embedded systems.
I have only serial ports to my embedded system. I am trying to
write a driver for ps/2 keyboard / ps/2 mouse to work with the serial port.
I bought an adapter for ps/2 to 9-pin serial port. But I am unable to
test as I am not getting any reponse through
D. W. Piper wrote:
> I've just spent the last couple of days wading through on-line
> documentation and mail list archives to no avail.
>
> Throughout the day we get two-line error messages appearing both on the
> console, and in /var/log/messages, such as the following:
>
> kernel: lookup_b
I've just spent the last couple of days wading through on-line
documentation and mail list archives to no avail.
Throughout the day we get two-line error messages appearing both on the
console, and in /var/log/messages, such as the following:
kernel: lookup_by_inode: ino 43807 not found in s
George Georgiev wrote:
> i was running as a root, and my xconfig went all ok.
> i have ctx pr711 running under linux on 1024X768 at 32 bit
>
> _
First guess is that you are su'ed into an account from another. This causes
all kinds of console ownership issues.
Make sure you are running under th
i was running as a root, and my xconfig went all ok.
i have ctx pr711 running under linux on 1024X768 at 32 bit
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTE
I had a question earlier about kernel configuration and made an error in the
order of my steps so I wanted to clarify this incase someone tried to use
this order or a kernel build. Earlier I said I had to do this:
backing up my old kernel
make mkproper
make config >> here I set all my o
On Fri, 29 May 1998, Gary Nielson wrote:
> me clarify some of what I think I am hearing. Basically, I have an older
> Dell PC, 1993 vintage, that is not compliant. My understanding from my
Why do you think your PC is not compliant? As far as I know all PC-type
computers are compliant,
Hi,
I am new to this mailing list but have been reading the newsgroup postings on
RedHat Linux compliance to the Year 2000. I was wondering if someone could help
me clarify some of what I think I am hearing. Basically, I have an older Dell
PC, 1993 vintage, that is not compliant. My
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Derek Balling wrote:
..snip..
>
> Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
> can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance your email
> simply by adding an MX record of equal priority.
>
Derek - how is this implemented in a pop
10 matches
Mail list logo
