I am getting use to Gnome and have a few problems / questions. this is a
new 6.1 install and I am always logging in as root.
On Gnome Desktop
I have lost the 4 screen / desktop selector icon that was on the
bottom Start bar...how do I get it back.
For some reason all my windows open in the top
On May 15, 10:07pm, Tony Wells wrote:
>
> Lastly,
> Having just finished writing my POP3/SMTP proxy for 32bit windows
> I'l looking for a new project, and wonder whether I might enter
> into this strange world of x-windows. There doesn't seem to be
> *anything* in the way of GNU-type-license X-win
Hi Chris,
>Where are you running the xterm? The reason I ask is that (a) the
standard
>RedHat 5 xterm client does not understand "0.0" (although it
understands
>":0.0") and (b) on most modern Linux systems, when you telnet
into them, the
>DISPLAY variable is *automatically* set for you, you proba
On May 15, 7:27am, Tony Wells wrote:
>
> Everying thig you wrote Chris makes perfect sensce, except for
> one thing which throws me off beam and caused my original
> question. The problem is this: For the freeware products like
> TNTlite, I have to use telnet to initiate the session by setting
>Thus to connect to screen 0 of display 0 on host foo.com, set
DISPLAY to:
>
> foo.com:0.0
Ahh, the mist is clearing .
Everying thig you wrote Chris makes perfect sensce, except for
one thing which throws me off beam and caused my original
question. The problem is this: For the freeware produ
Thanks to all for the comments. Just having the real layout of the X's
client/server architecture did wonders for clearing the scales from my eyes.
It seems that the short answer to my specific situation is, sure, I should be
able to run the dotfile generator on my non-X-bearing firewall with li
'Scuse my jumping in and adding another $0.02 to the various comments so far...
>
> All of this is confusing at first, since it isn't really like the
> client-server models for just about everything else (http, ftp,
> etc.).
Actually, it is the same, but you have to think through the reasoning
Kevin Mernick wrote:
All of this is confusing at first, since it isn't really like the
client-server models for just about everything else (http, ftp,
etc.). I
hope this explanation helped. If you have more questions please
ask.
Hmn,
I'm in the queue for confusion as well, but you've' helped
Original Message-
> From: Michael Jinks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 1998 2:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: basic X questions (was Re: X server for NT?)
>
> Fred Lenk wrote:
>
> > If you are trying to share the X apps on your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Michael Jinks wrote:
> Fred Lenk wrote:
>
> > If you are trying to share the X apps on your Linux box, the Linux is
> > the X server, and the other workstations are the X clients.
>
> Okay, now this is something that's been confusing me. The layout you
> d
Fred Lenk wrote:
> If you are trying to share the X apps on your Linux box, the Linux is
> the X server, and the other workstations are the X clients.
Okay, now this is something that's been confusing me. The layout you describe
is the way I thought it was, but others have told me that I'm wron
11 matches
Mail list logo
