testing
With Regards
Nabin Limbu
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi,
I use ssh for all my logins on to Redhat 7.2 box.
But for the purpose of learning I want to know how to enable rlogins on the
linux box. I'd appreciate your help in this regard.
Thanks,
Peram
On Sunday 06 July 2003 14:38, Cowles, Steve wrote:
>
> Your setup is very similar to what I have setup here. I too, frontend
> an exchange server with sendmail/spamass-milter/spamassassin. Your
> document is not a bad start for people wanting to frontend another
> mail server using SA. i.e. procm
> -Original Message-
> From: MKlinke
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 11:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing
>
>
> On Sunday 06 July 2003 03:02, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote:
> > >Didn't mean
On Sunday 06 July 2003 03:02, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote:
> >Didn't mean to send this to the RH list but what the heck! As I
> > said to my office mates, let me know if you have any questions!
>
> Yes. Since you've come this far, how about a quick Mini-HOWTO messag
At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote:
Didn't mean to send this to the RH list but what the heck! As I said to
my office mates, let me know if you have any questions!
Yes. Since you've come this far, how about a quick Mini-HOWTO message on
what you did? That way the rest of us can compare notes.
--
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 16:23, MKlinke wrote:
> Well,
>
> Not all the mail we receive is flowing through the filter server yet,
> some is still being delivered direct to our regular unfiltered
> server, but a substantial portion of it is now being filtered.
>
> From my point
Well,
Not all the mail we receive is flowing through the filter server yet,
some is still being delivered direct to our regular unfiltered server,
but a substantial portion of it is now being filtered.
>From my point of view this testing has been a resounding success! In the
past 30 ho
Hi Jonathan,
> I was wondering if anyone has any information regarding RH10, it's
> release schedule etc.
Usually half a year after the last release, give or take a few weeks.
Preannouncements are never made. No need to ask.
> I
> had a poke around the Redhat FTP site, and the current beta d
Jonathan Atkinson wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has any information regarding RH10, it's
release schedule etc.
I remember back prior to the RH9 release the 'Phoebe' beta program was
quite public, I certainly saw plenty of articles regarding the betas. I
had a poke around the Redhat FTP
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has any information regarding RH10, it's
release schedule etc.
I remember back prior to the RH9 release the 'Phoebe' beta program was
quite public, I certainly saw plenty of articles regarding the betas. I
had a poke around the Redhat FTP site, and the current bet
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 08:46, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> 2 minutes can also be the difference between her being satisfied, or
> disappointed.
TWO MINUTES? Mate, that's way too long for me...30 seconds, maybe even a
minute, but TWO? Nah...
--
Wed Apr 2 12:05:01 EST 2003
12:05:01 up 11 day
Most of the new stuff in in core where we can't see it (Kernel, POSIX,
Xfree86)
New stuff...
Neat cursors and pointers
Slightly changed Blue Curve theme
SAMBA GUI (clean and simple but not as feature rich as SWAT)
Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla
Rearranged start menu (or whatever it's called in Gno
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 00:38, DuSTiN KRySaK wrote:
> And? Works fine? Issues? Problem hardware?
Loaded just 2 hours ago... Seems to look like Phoebe3. It is working
fine and I did not encounter any hardware problems [I was afraid during
install because of I heard about bad experiences w/ LCD scree
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Uh, I thought it was posted 19 minutes ago...two minutes is a big
leap...
2 minutes can also be the difference between her being satisfied, or
disappointed. Take your pick. Some people receive email faster than
others because they're higher up in the membership list o
On 4/1/03 2:30 PM, "CORNELY Nicolas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spit this out
onto my computer screen:
>> loaded...
>
> I did it.
And? Works fine? Issues? Problem hardware?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On 4/1/03 2:20 PM, "Stephen Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spit this out
onto my computer screen:
> Uh, I thought it was posted 19 minutes ago...two minutes is a big
> leap...
Well at the time I hit "send"... ;-)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.red
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:00:46PM -0800, DuSTiN KRySaK wrote:
> I hate to chime in on the RH9 stuff - but just curious if anyone has loaded
> it, and anything to report back?
I've got the images burned and will be installing on my new system
tonight.
> Also what version of Apache, MySQL & VSFTP
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 00:00, DuSTiN KRySaK wrote:
> loaded...
I did it.
> Also what version of Apache, MySQL & VSFTPD does V9 come with?
Packages list is available @ redhat.com.
Nx
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 08:17, DuSTiN KRySaK wrote:
> On 4/1/03 2:08 PM, "Stephen Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spit this out
> onto my computer screen:
>
> > (Maybe the lack of response is an indication of it's viability?)
>
>
> Well maybe - but granted I did only post 16 minutes ago! ;-)
>
> d
On 4/1/03 2:08 PM, "Stephen Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spit this out
onto my computer screen:
> (Maybe the lack of response is an indication of it's viability?)
Well maybe - but granted I did only post 16 minutes ago! ;-)
d
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 08:00, DuSTiN KRySaK wrote:
> I hate to chime in on the RH9 stuff - but just curious if anyone has loaded
> it, and anything to report back?
>
> Also what version of Apache, MySQL & VSFTPD does V9 come with?
>
> Thanks!
(Maybe the lack of response is an indication of it's v
I hate to chime in on the RH9 stuff - but just curious if anyone has loaded
it, and anything to report back?
Also what version of Apache, MySQL & VSFTPD does V9 come with?
Thanks!
.::d::.
--- THEbeatingsWILLcontinueUNTILmoraleIMPROVES ---
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe m
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nate
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speediup simulation testing
santosh kumar said:
> Hi folks,
> Have some problem with performance..The server is configured with
santosh kumar said:
> Hi folks,
> Have some problem with performance..The server is configured with redhat
not sure if your subscribed to the list or not so I am CC:'n you.
asking the same question 3 times within a short period of time won't
get you an answer any faster.
You don't really provide
Hi folks,
Have some problem with performance..The server is configured with redhat 7.2
with the following configurations.
4 GB DDR RAM
AMD Athlon(tm) MP 1800+ (dual processors)
The server is specially using for running simulation tests but as per the
configuration not getting perfomance. To com
Title: Speeding up simulation testing
Hi folks,
Have some problem with performance..The server is configured with redhat 7.2 with the following configurations.
4 GB DDR RAM
AMD Athlon(tm) MP 1800+ (dual processors)
The server is specially using for running simulation tests but as per
one suggest to speed up simulation testing what to
be done??
Thanks for hearing the query...
Thanks & Regards,
santosh
ph : 080-5273061,5202417
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:08:10AM -0700, Trevor wrote:
>
> Is there anyway to do a non-destructive test on my hard drive on my RH7.x
> box? I have data on it (+50GB) at the moment.
badblocks -nv /dev/
where /dev/ is the device representing the partition you want to check.
Emmanuel
-
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: Non-destuctive hard drive testing
> Is there anyway to do a non-destructive test on my hard drive on my RH7.x
> box? I have data on it (+50GB) at the moment.
>
> I already have done fsck&#
Is there anyway to do a non-destructive test on my hard drive on my RH7.x
box? I have data on it (+50GB) at the moment.
I already have done fsck's on it... and everything appears normal.
Trev.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
transmittion will take place encrypted. Any idea? If there is no
testing-suite: has anybody already set up such an email-server with a
simple "return mail to sender"-reflector so I could check both
outgoing and incoming?
Greetingz
Stefan
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:49, Toralf Lund wrote:
> Now, I've run a lot of successful installations from my setup, but
often
> when I make a change, I make some kind of mistake or something
> inexplicable happens so that the installation fails, usually with
"keyword
> error".
[ ... ]
> something l
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> that will only detect if a string *starts* with at least one integer.
Exactly. So, unless you're expecting negative numbers, this will prevent
yet another kind of invalid data.
--
"Of course I'm in shape! Round's a shape, isn't it?"
--
redhat-
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> That's why constructs like:
>
> [[ 1 < a ]]; echo $?
>
> work. Incidentally, *any* number will evaluate to less than "a" in
> lexicographic sort order, so this can be used as another valid test for
> integers, and will be faster since it doesn't
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:07:16 -0500, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't found one yet!
>
>Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
>integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
>bash bombs
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:49, Toralf Lund wrote:
> Now, I've run a lot of successful installations from my setup, but often
> when I make a change, I make some kind of mistake or something
> inexplicable happens so that the installation fails, usually with "keyword
> error". I then have to modif
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
Nope. You'll have to do something more arcane:
function IsInt {
if egrep -q '[[:digit:]]+'
On 13:53 11 Feb 2003, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| It's just kind of wierd that the shell has builtin math functions, but
| can't, by itself, tell you if a value is a valid number.
You'll find you can usually contrive not to feed non-numbers to your
operations and don't need such a test of
On 14:07 11 Feb 2003, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
| and the matching also supports \( \)-style tagging a la Perl,
| so you can get the actual match itself.
More like sed really. Perl doesn't slosh the brackets.
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743
On 11:33 11 Feb 2003, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
| $ man expr
|
| the "expr" utility is, IMNSHO, sadly overlooked.
Forks an extra process. Needlessly slow. Cheers,
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.a
On 16:37 11 Feb 2003, Robert Tinsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:31, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
| > How about a case statement:
| > case $var in
| >1234567890)
|
| i think you mean
| 1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0)
Or just:
case $var in
[0-9])
This wor
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
> It's just kind of wierd that the shell has builtin math functions, but
> can't, by itself, tell you if a value is a valid number.
Not really, since bash variables don't have type. Essentially, all
variables are strings; the fact that you can apply integer logi
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > $ man expr
> >
> > the "expr" utility is, IMNSHO, sadly overlooked.
> >
> > rday
> >
> >
> >
> Thanks for the suggestion. I figured out that I can use
>
> $ expr match $var "[0-9]*$"
>
> and it will return >=1 for a valid i
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't found one yet!
Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
bash bombs out if you t
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
> Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
> integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
Nope. You'll have to do something more arcane:
function IsInt {
if egrep -q '[[:digit:]]+' <(echo $1)
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:31, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> How about a case statement:
>
> case $var in
>1234567890)
i think you mean
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0)
> do something;;
>*)
> echo $var is not a number
> esac
cheers,
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ do NOT use the following e-
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gordon wrote:
> I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't found one yet!
>
> Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
> integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
> bash bombs out if you try to do a compar
Gordon wrote:
I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't found one yet!
Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
bash bombs out if you try to do a comparison or arithmetic with a
non-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> "Gordon" == Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gordon> I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't
Gordon> found one yet! Is there a way in a bash script to test if
Gordon> a variable contains an integer? I want to create a scrip
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:07, Gordon wrote:
> I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't found one yet!
>
> Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
> integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
> bash bombs out if you try to do a
I've searched all over for an answer to this and haven't found one yet!
Is there a way in a bash script to test if a variable contains an
integer? I want to create a script that uses some simple arithmetic but
bash bombs out if you try to do a comparison or arithmetic with a
non-numeric value.
We are usually installing Linux on our office workstations via a FTP
install tree with a slightly modified version of the Red Hat tree. I've
added a few files to RedHat/RPMS, updated RedHat/base/comps to suit our
needs, and created new hdlists using "genhdlist" from anaconda-runtime.
Now, I've
I'm sorry if anybody's annoyed by the caps and I'm sorry if that is
frowned upon on this list but my posts don't seem to be getting through
lately and I'm not sure weather or not it's my server or somehow this
list... I just wanted to make sure. I've had some problems setting up
samba on my network
Andrew,
I recieved your message loud and clear :)
-- Jonathan
Quoting "Rechenberg, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> My messages have not been getting through. I've changed my reply-to
> address and I'm seeing if this works. Please ignore
>
> Andrew Rechenberg
> Infrastructure Team, Sherman F
My messages have not been getting through. I've changed my reply-to
address and I'm seeing if this works. Please ignore
Andrew Rechenberg
Infrastructure Team, Sherman Financial Group
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat
I THINK I might have finally gotten it all working... I never felt so
good as when I could uninstall IEMS. :)
Jim Hale
-
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://hale.dyndns.org
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> if [ ! ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install ] ; then
> echo "an error occured"
> exit #i don't know the command to exit a bash script
> fi
if ! { ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install; }
then
echo "an error
ure --prefix=$1 && make && make install
| but i want to exit if any of them fail.
That's what && does! No changes needed.
| i figured the following would work
| but it doesn't:
| if [ ! ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install ] ; then
"[
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 01:12 am, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install
> Should work within a script, exiting if something fails. (as long as
> the script and configure are in the same directory)
That's not clear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:38 am, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> thanks to both of yall for the reply, but it didn't work. i
> copied/pasted into a file, changed the EXCLUDE_LIST to something
> meaningful on my system, but it doesn't work, it just p
thanks to both of yall for the reply, but it didn't work. i copied/pasted
into a file, changed the EXCLUDE_LIST to something meaningful on my system,
but it doesn't work, it just prints out all the dirs in the dir that i'm in.
i got another bash question though. i wanna execute the following
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3"
> for DIR in `ls -d */` ; do
> if [ $DIR in $EXCLUDE_LIST ] ; then
> continue;
> fi
> echo $DIR
> done
Try this:
EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3"
for DIR in `ls -d */` ; do
On 22:37 29 Apr 2002, Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Monday 29 April 2002 09:39 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > |On 17:58 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | i wanna get this sudo (sp?) code working...
| > | EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3"
| > | for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 29 April 2002 09:39 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> |On 17:58 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | i wanna get this sudo (sp?) code working...
> |
> | EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3"
> | for DIR in `ls -d */` ; do
>
On 17:58 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| i've been reading about advanced bash scripting on some webpage, but i can't
| seem to find what i'm looking for.
|
| is there an easy way to tell if a var is in a list (a list like in a for loop
| list)? is there a keywo
i've been reading about advanced bash scripting on some webpage, but i can't
seem to find what i'm looking for.
is there an easy way to tell if a var is in a list (a list like in a for loop
list)? is there a keyword that does what continue does in c?
i wanna get this sudo (sp?) code working..
Here's one for speed I know of...
http://www.2wire.com/services/index.html
Ragnar Wiencke wrote:
>
>
> Hi there.
>
> I once read ( and used it) about a web site that was used to test ones
> adsl connection for speed and security. Now I lost the address or URL.
> Does anyone know that one or
Hi there.
I once read ( and used it) about a web site that was used to test ones adsl
connection for speed and security. Now I lost the address or URL. Does
anyone know that one or similar sites?
Tia,
Ragnar W.
_
Chat with fr
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:28:58AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a command to test eth0 and eth1 on a machine to make sure that the
> hardware actually works and hasn't failed? Up until two days ago my network
> was working just fine and now it has stopped. I can't ping in or out. I
>
Is there a command to test eth0 and eth1 on a machine to make sure that the
hardware actually works and hasn't failed? Up until two days ago my network
was working just fine and now it has stopped. I can't ping in or out. I
don't know what to look for.
Thanks in advance
Linda
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Redhat-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:56 PM
Subject: testing for a user in a script?
> I am trying to create a SPEC file for a server and need to add a user for
> the server to run under. I know I can do "useradd -r &qu
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 04:56:15PM -0600, Chad and Doria Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I am trying to create a SPEC file for a server and need to add a user for
| the server to run under. I know I can do "useradd -r " and create
| the user, how would I test to make sure this user does not
On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 16:56, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote:
> I am trying to create a SPEC file for a server and need to add a user for
> the server to run under. I know I can do "useradd -r " and create
> the user, how would I test to make sure this user does not exist before I
> create it. Or, do
I am trying to create a SPEC file for a server and need to add a user for
the server to run under. I know I can do "useradd -r " and create
the user, how would I test to make sure this user does not exist before I
create it. Or, does it even matter since useradd won't add to users with the
same us
Hello,
Testing only ( needn't reply ) !
Thank and sorry to you !
Edward.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
2001 1:23 PM
> To: Steve Lee
> Subject: testing ram
>
>
> does anyone know of any program to test ram
> in linux? I used use Norton's software in
> old days to test RAM.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I found a great utility at www.freshmeat.net called memtestx86.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Lee
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:23 PM
To: Steve Lee
Subject: testing ram
does anyone know of any program to test ram
in linux
On 11-Apr-01 Steve Lee opined:
> does anyone know of any program to test ram
> in linux? I used use Norton's software in
> old days to test RAM.
Search for memtest86 on freshmeat. Works for me.
---
Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it.
_
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Steve Lee wrote:
> does anyone know of any program to test ram
> in linux? I used use Norton's software in
> old days to test RAM.
>
> Thanks.
>
It is hard to do a good memory test when the OS is running. I preferrer
to run memtest86 - it is a stand alone program that tests
memtest86
http://reality.sgi.com/cbrady_denver/memtest86/
eric
- Original Message -
does anyone know of any program to test ram
in linux? I used use Norton's software in
old days to test RAM.
Thanks.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
does anyone know of any program to test ram
in linux? I used use Norton's software in
old days to test RAM.
Thanks.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:53:20AM -0500, rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Melvin wrote:
| > For this we can simplify it alot and get find to do all the work for us...
| > find . -type d -exec chmod 2770 {} \;
| > ... and because the file name is never passed thr
Matthew Melvin wrote:
>
> 'cept xargs isn't going to preserve your spaces. Well it might i guess if
> we get find to help out a bit...
>
> find . -type d -printf '"%p"\n' | xargs chmod 2770
what does the %p represent? Is that a find thing or a shell thing?
Bret
_
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 9:53am (-0500), rpjday wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Melvin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 1:54pm (-), Tristan Hill wrote:
> >
> > > I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories
> > > relative to the current path and change each di
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Melvin wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 1:54pm (-), Tristan Hill wrote:
>
> > I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories
> > relative to the current path and change each directories permission. The
> > script fail to pickup directories
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 1:54pm (-), Tristan Hill wrote:
> I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories
> relative to the current path and change each directories permission. The
> script fail to pickup directories with a space in the name though.
> Corrections to t
I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories
relative to the current path and change each directories permission. The
script fail to pickup directories with a space in the name though.
Corrections to the script would be much appreciated.
#!/bin/bash
for each in `fi
.)
Does anyone know of some good testing tools for these?
-Rob
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I updated the srpms, one for RH 6.1, one for RH 6.2.
http://www.jasons.org/php4/
See the announcement from last week for more info on the build
process.
http://www.moongroup.com/Redhat11/msg01437.html
--
Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} or
Sorry 'bout thiswe appear to have had some mail server
problems over the weekend and I'm just trying to verify
that mail IS going out!
Thanks...
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
I've got what I feel is a reasonably useful RPM build of PHP 4.0.0.
It builds out of the box on RedHat 6.2. It takes a bit of "tweaking" to get
it to run in 6.1.
You MUST be running the imap-4.7 and imap-devel-4.7 packages. These are a
part of RedHat 6.2. You cannot install the RH 6.2 RPMs on
Message sent 7:30 pm Friday 19th May 2000.
Ahbaid.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
This message is a test of the timeliness of the list. It
was sent at approximately 9:40AM Eastern time on May 17th.
Hopefully, it'll show up sometime today!!!
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
testing
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Charles:
Well I think I've got part of my answer.
See attached file.
Bye-thanks_TED
$ perldoc cgi_to_mod_perl
For using mod_perl as a CGI replacement, the recommended
configuration is as follows:
Alias /perl/ /real/path/to/perl-scripts/
SetHa
Charles Galpin wrote:
> Sorry, I said too much :). I should have just gone with the URL.
>
> Yes, i was commenting on the use of a shell script to invoke a perl script
> instead of calling it directly. You can do it any way you like, but if you
> want to use mod_perl, you might want to consid
Sorry, I said too much :). I should have just gone with the URL.
Yes, i was commenting on the use of a shell script to invoke a perl script
instead of calling it directly. You can do it any way you like, but if you
want to use mod_perl, you might want to consider putting that script logic
into p
Charles Galpin wrote:
> Hi TED
>
> there is no silver mod_perl bullet. I would start here
>
> http://perl.apache.org
>
> Als, your description below of the cgi process is a bit warped (or you are
> using it in a warped manner) :).
>
> charles
>
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
>
> > With a
Hi TED
there is no silver mod_perl bullet. I would start here
http://perl.apache.org
Als, your description below of the cgi process is a bit warped (or you are
using it in a warped manner) :).
charles
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
> With a lot of help I've now arrived at a detailed pr
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
