On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:18:49PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> Sort of a bummer since we use the distro for non server based tasks but
> require considerable testing before rolling out a config. I would think
> that this will slow down the acceptance of RHL on the corporate desktop
> as well fo
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:18:49PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 13:53, Ed Wilts wrote:
> Sort of a bummer since we use the distro for non server based tasks but
> require considerable testing before rolling out a config. I would think
> that this will slow down the acceptance
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 13:53, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:54:51AM -0500, Warren Johnson wrote:
> > I'm using a Promise RAID controller on my home system with 6 drives. I
> > wanted to try it before I put it on a lot of other systems. I haven't
> > had any problems with it, but i
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:54:51AM -0500, Warren Johnson wrote:
> I'm using a Promise RAID controller on my home system with 6 drives. I
> wanted to try it before I put it on a lot of other systems. I haven't
> had any problems with it, but it does take Promise a long time to get
> new drivers
Ben Russo wrote:
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 17:52, nate wrote:
Really? I haven't had the fun of playing with any IDE HW Raid devices..
But do you have LOTS of experiences with this? Or is it just a few cases?
I am curious because I am considering purchasing some Promise HW IDE
RAID arrays that have
Ed Wilts said:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:52:28PM -0800, nate wrote:
>> have you tested your raid1 ? I have only had 1 failure with software
>> raid 1 on linux out of about 10 arrays. And when it failed the system
>> went with it. IMO, the point of software raid is to protect data, not
>> protect
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:52:28PM -0800, nate wrote:
> have you tested your raid1 ? I have only had 1 failure with software raid
> 1 on linux out of about 10 arrays. And when it failed the system went with
> it. IMO, the point of software raid is to protect data, not protect uptime.
> Data can sti
Ben Russo said:
> Really? I haven't had the fun of playing with any IDE HW Raid devices..
> But do you have LOTS of experiences with this? Or is it just a few cases?
> I am curious because I am considering purchasing some Promise HW IDE RAID
> arrays that have SCSI Host Interfaces? They just se
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 17:52, nate wrote:
> I have even had hardware raid 10 (3ware 6800 series) take down a system when
> a disk(1 out of 6) dies. That happened everytime a disk failed. system
> would immediately kernel panic.
Yep! I've had SUN HW RAID Arrays Fail, and NetApp Hardware Raid Arrays
David Neilson said:
> Yes, the intent of original question was to use raid-1 to mirror swap so
> if one disk crashed, the system would not go down. Are there any negative
> or hidden ramifications with swapping on raid-1 on RH7.2?
have you tested your raid1 ? I have only had 1 failure with softwa
, December 18, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Software RAID and SWAP
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:44:34PM -0800, nate wrote:
> David Neilson said:
> > I am running software RAID on a RH 7.2 box (raidtools-0.90-23). I have
> > configured all system partitions to be mirr
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:44:34PM -0800, nate wrote:
> David Neilson said:
> > I am running software RAID on a RH 7.2 box (raidtools-0.90-23). I have
> > configured all system partitions to be mirrored, including swap. The
> > question is: Does swapping on RAID work?
>
>
> I do not think soft
David Neilson said:
> I am running software RAID on a RH 7.2 box (raidtools-0.90-23). I have
> configured all system partitions to be mirrored, including swap. The
> question is: Does swapping on RAID work?
I do not think software raid can work with swap. unless you use a swap
file .. hardware
I am running software RAID on a RH 7.2 box (raidtools-0.90-23). I have
configured all system partitions to be mirrored, including swap. The
question is: Does swapping on RAID work?
The reason I ask is the following document on software RAID (which happens
to be the most current RAID document
14 matches
Mail list logo
