Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-22 Thread Eric Smith
Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still maintain (assuming you are at the console) that the easiest way > to bring the system down though is . Although there are many reasons why someone might disable the three-finger-salute, or change its behavior. On several of my machines, most notab

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-21 Thread Tom Diehl
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, mud99 wrote: > how about just doing an init 6 or init 0? is this okay? init 6 is what shutdown does. This will reboot the system. init 0 should just bring it down and halt it (no reboot, you have to manually reset it to get it to reboot). I still maintain (assuming you are a

Re: FW: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-21 Thread Tom Diehl
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, james huckle wrote: > I've always used 'reboot'. It seems to work as well as sysv 'shutdown'. > The man pg for halt says reboot or halt calls shutdown, so it does not matter. This is definitely NOT true for some other unices that I have worked with. That is why I initially h

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-21 Thread mud99
>On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, Vidiot wrote: > >> > A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpying: >> > >> > sync;sync;halt >> > >> > I shutdown my RH 5.0 with the command listed in the manual: >> > >> > shutdown -h now >> > >> > Just wondering if there is a difference bet

Re: FW: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-21 Thread Dan Cyr
t; From:[EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Reply To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 20 March 1998 15:54 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Shutting Down RH Linux >> >> A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpyi

FW: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-21 Thread james huckle
I've always used 'reboot'. It seems to work as well as sysv 'shutdown'. James > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 March 1998 15:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subje

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-20 Thread Tom Diehl
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, Vidiot wrote: > > A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpying: > > > > sync;sync;halt > > > > I shutdown my RH 5.0 with the command listed in the manual: > > > > shutdown -h now > > > > Just wondering if there is a differ

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-20 Thread Paul F Almquist
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 09:05:11AM -0700, Brad Davis wrote: > > > A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpying: > > > > > > sync;sync;halt > > > > > > I shutdown my RH 5.0 with the command listed in the manual: > > > > > > shutdown -h now > > > > >

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-20 Thread Vidiot
>The shutdown command works nicely and avoids having to wait for the syncs >to finish... But, syncs are still done. MB -- System Administrator - Finnigan FT/MS - Madison WI. URL:http://www.ftms.com/ e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (608) 273-8262 ext: 612 fax: (608) 273-8719 Visit - URL:http:/

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-20 Thread Brad Davis
> > A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpying: > > > > sync;sync;halt > > > > I shutdown my RH 5.0 with the command listed in the manual: > > > > shutdown -h now > > > > Just wondering if there is a difference between the two and is there a

Re: Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-20 Thread Vidiot
> A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpying: > > sync;sync;halt > > I shutdown my RH 5.0 with the command listed in the manual: > > shutdown -h now > > Just wondering if there is a difference between the two and is there a > preferred m

Shutting Down RH Linux

1998-03-20 Thread Robert_Floyd
A guy I work with says he shuts down his RH 5.0 by tpying: sync;sync;halt I shutdown my RH 5.0 with the command listed in the manual: shutdown -h now Just wondering if there is a difference between the two and is there a preferred method for