On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Chuck Mead wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Burger posted the following:
>
> MB>Sorry...I was unclear. I've not tried Mr. Mudd's package, before. I've
> MB>tried the RedHat versions, and certain 19991231 versions from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Burger posted the following:
MB>Sorry...I was unclear. I've not tried Mr. Mudd's package, before. I've
MB>tried the RedHat versions, and certain 19991231 versions from a common
MB>friend of ours, but not Mr. Mudd's packag
Sorry...I was unclear. I've not tried Mr. Mudd's package, before. I've
tried the RedHat versions, and certain 19991231 versions from a common
friend of ours, but not Mr. Mudd's packages.
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Chuck Mead wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 8 Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Burger posted the following:
MB>Does this version still work with the "btree:/etc/postfix/dracd"
MB>directive, or does "btree" need to be replaced with a new directive?
I think you should address this to Simon:
Simon J Mud
Does this version still work with the "btree:/etc/postfix/dracd"
directive, or does "btree" need to be replaced with a new directive?
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Chuck Mead wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Burger posted the following:
>
> MB>On Tue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Burger posted the following:
MB>On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Chuck Mead wrote:
MB>
MB>> Dump it and use this one:
MB>>
MB>>
http://www.ea4els.ampr.org/~sjmudd/postfix/ftp/rh72/RPMS/i386/postfix-20010228_pl08release-3.i386.rpm
MB>>
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Chuck Mead wrote:
> Dump it and use this one:
>
>
>http://www.ea4els.ampr.org/~sjmudd/postfix/ftp/rh72/RPMS/i386/postfix-20010228_pl08release-3.i386.rpm
>
> It's a better, and much more complete, package. Let me know if you need
> it customized to do specific things.
Will
Sent privately.
I noticed that the spool directory name for postfix is different to
sendmail. I tried settin the postfix spool directory to the existing dir.
POstfix noticed that, recreated a lot of missing stuff, and promptly died
and would not restart.
Needless to say, I put it back.
j.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Julian Opificius posted the following:
JO>(This is a reponse to both of your posts.)
JO>Thanks for coming to my rescue again, Chuck.
JO>
JO>Actually I think I'm doing better than his 20102228 release - I'm using the
JO>20011226 sn
(This is a reponse to both of your posts.)
Thanks for coming to my rescue again, Chuck.
Actually I think I'm doing better than his 20102228 release - I'm using the
20011226 snapshot which, unless he was very full of "Christmas spirit" when
he released it, should be better still.
Yes, I found t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Julian Opificius posted the following:
If you're on a static ip with a home network then the configuration and
explanation here should be of help (but you need the other config I sent
you to make sense of it):
http://www.moongro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Julian Opificius posted the following:
JO>Hi again,
JO>I'm trying to replace sendmail with postfix, because I'm a regular guy and
JO>not Mensa material.
JO>I'm getting even more confused than I normally am and would really
JO>app
Hi again,
I'm trying to replace sendmail with postfix, because I'm a regular guy and
not Mensa material.
I'm getting even more confused than I normally am and would really
appreciate the help of someone who has been through this before. Reading
the howto's has left my head spinning.
My basic
13 matches
Mail list logo
