: Re: Sendmail questions
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID = 0x801BFD2B
*** Signed: 01/07/2003 8:10:06 AM
*** Verified: 01/07/2003 8:14:04 AM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 08:04 am, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No doubt...
- -Original Message-
From: Michael Fratoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail questions
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 08:04 am, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> I got it fixed... Seems it was another "feature" of linuxconfig
> (besides hosing appache.conf" - it seems to have hosed sendmail.conf,
> as well. I un/reinstalled sen
), and manually modified access (plus a "make
access.db"), and now it seems to work.
Thanks for the help.
- -Original Message-
From: Ashwin Khandare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail questions
wha
what version of sendmail u r using ?
- Original Message -
From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: Sendmail questions
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail questions
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID = 0x801BFD2B
*** Signed: 01/02/2003 10:26:10 PM
*** Verified: 01/03/2003 7:56:01 AM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
On Thursday 02 January 2003 04:44 pm, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
&
day, January 02, 2003 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail questions
On 02-Jan-2003/13:44 -0800, "Burke, Thomas G."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey gang,
>
> I've got the server put mostly back together after the wipeout...
>I'm having so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yes
- -Original Message-
From: Ze Ji Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail questions
Is your Fw in sendmail.cf defined?
ex:
# file containing names of hosts for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 January 2003 04:44 pm, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> I've got the server put mostly back together after the wipeout...
> I'm having some problems with sendmail, however, and I cannot seem to
> isolate them.
>
> Sendmail -
On 02-Jan-2003/13:44 -0800, "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey gang,
>
> I've got the server put mostly back together after the wipeout...
>I'm having some problems with sendmail, however, and I cannot seem to
>isolate them.
>
>Sendmail -> Sendmail is accepting connections &
Is your Fw in sendmail.cf defined?
ex:
# file containing names of hosts for which we receive email
Fw/etc/mail/sendmail.cw
Ze
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Alpert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject:
is just in trying to send mail to some
> other network (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Then it kicks back
> the no
> relay error message.
>
> - -Original Message-
> From: Brad Alpert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 4:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROT
8 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail questions
You did enable imap and pop (and optionally, imaps and pops) in the
/etc/xinetd.d/imap (and ipop3) files, right?
That one used to catch me every time.
Brad
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey gang,
>
&
You did enable imap and pop (and optionally, imaps and pops) in the
/etc/xinetd.d/imap (and ipop3) files, right?
That one used to catch me every time.
Brad
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey gang,
>
> I've got the server put mostly back together after the wipeout...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey gang,
I've got the server put mostly back together after the wipeout...
I'm having some problems with sendmail, however, and I cannot seem to
isolate them.
Sendmail -> Sendmail is accepting connections & I can TX/RX e-mail
from the serve
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Dana Holland wrote:
> We're about to purchase a new box to act as a mail server - our current
> mail server resides on a box with a lot of other applications.
>
> I think I've just about made up my mind to go with sendmail (version
> that comes with RH), but I'm getting con
We're about to purchase a new box to act as a mail server - our current
mail server resides on a box with a lot of other applications.
I think I've just about made up my mind to go with sendmail (version
that comes with RH), but I'm getting conflicting reports on what size
box we need to buy.
17 matches
Mail list logo
