On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:17, Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
> Hello!
> We would like to apply the patch on RH 6.0 but there is only a download
> for 6.2!
> Did somebody that already or it is not advisable?
> Thanks
Should work fine. Redhat has always done a good job keeping binary
compatability between t
Hello!
We would like to apply the patch on RH 6.0 but there is only a download
for 6.2!
Did somebody that already or it is not advisable?
Thanks
begin:vcard
n:Szemerédy;Gábor
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.srce.net
org:Zavod za informatiku i AOP Subotica;HW-SW
adr:;;Adolfa Singera 12;Subotica;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:52 pm, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:00:29PM -0500, William Warren wrote:
> > (I submitted this without a subject line. Sorry.)
> >
> > I did an up2date last night to get the se
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kinz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Changes to sendmail.mc in the new Sendmail patch
>
> > < dnl FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl
> > ---
> > > FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_dom
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:00:29PM -0500, William Warren wrote:
> (I submitted this without a subject line. Sorry.)
>
> I did an up2date last night to get the sendmail patch, and I'm curious
> about one of the changes I noticed.
>
> The sendmail.mc file has been changed:
(I submitted this without a subject line. Sorry.)
I did an up2date last night to get the sendmail patch, and I'm curious
about one of the changes I noticed.
The sendmail.mc file has been changed: here's the diff output -
diff /etc/mail/sendmail.mc /etc/mail.sendmail.mc.rpmnew
10a1
