On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:00:29PM -0500, William Warren wrote:
> (I submitted this without a subject line. Sorry.)
> 
> I did an up2date last night to get the sendmail patch, and I'm curious 
> about one of the changes I noticed.
> 
> The sendmail.mc file has been changed: here's the diff output -
> 
> diff /etc/mail/sendmail.mc /etc/mail.sendmail.mc.rpmnew
> 10a11,13
> > dnl Uncomment and edit the following line if your mail needs to be sent out
> > dnl through an external mail server:
> > dnl define(`SMART_HOST',`smtp.your.provider')
> 39a43
> > dnl The '-t' option will retry delivery if e.g. the user runs over his quota.
> 47c51
> < dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')
> ---
> > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')
> 54c58
> < dnl FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl
> ---
> > FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl
> 
> Now, I can understand why Redhat would choose to be conservative, 
> and set the port option to localhost only (127.0.0.1), but I'm 
> puzzled as to why they have turned on the "accept_unresolvable_domains" 
> option.
> 
> Any opinions?

Scary, very scary - anybody wanna be a spammer's self service site ?





-- 
Jeff Kinz, Open-PC, Emergent Research,  Hudson, MA.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copyright 2003.  Use is restricted. Any use is an 
acceptance of the offer at http://www.kinz.org/policy.html.



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to