Re: Reg. NTP

2003-01-22 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I restarted ntpd daemon by the following command /etc/init/ntpd restart Then I copied the content of /var/log/messages for your reference. It says something fudge. I dont understand what is fudge ? I don't know and google doesn't give me the error either - the bind error address already in use w

Re: Reg. NTP

2003-01-21 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, trysaran wrote: > Jan 22 09:46:05 np ntpd[9889]: 178.1.222.1 is inappropriate address for > the fudge command, line ignored The fudge factor should only be applied to localhost entries, not to external clock sources. You have a hosed configuration file. Read the html document

Reg. NTP

2003-01-21 Thread trysaran
Message: 13From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: Reg. NTP Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:03:10 +0800Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have two machines one with RH8.0 and another with RH7.2 RH8.0 is theNIS/NFS server and RH7.2 is the NIS/N

Re: Reg. NTP

2003-01-21 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I have two machines one with RH8.0 and another with RH7.2 RH8.0 is the NIS/NFS server and RH7.2 is the NIS/NFS client. I am trying to use NTP to synchronise but I am unable. I installed the same version of NTP in both the machines still problem persists. What I have to do ? What do your logs sa

Reg. NTP

2003-01-21 Thread trysaran
Dear Friends, I have two machines one with RH8.0 and another with RH7.2 RH8.0 is the NIS/NFS server and RH7.2 is the NIS/NFS client. I am trying to use NTP to synchronise but I am unable. I installed the same version of NTP in both the machines still problem persists. What I have to do ? Thanks in