Re: Testing hdlist/comps etc. for customised install base?

2003-02-18 Thread Toralf Lund
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:49, Toralf Lund wrote: > Now, I've run a lot of successful installations from my setup, but often > when I make a change, I make some kind of mistake or something > inexplicable happens so that the installation fails, usually with "keyword > error". [ ... ] > something l

Re: Testing hdlist/comps etc. for customised install base?

2003-02-12 Thread Chris Rouch
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:49, Toralf Lund wrote: > Now, I've run a lot of successful installations from my setup, but often > when I make a change, I make some kind of mistake or something > inexplicable happens so that the installation fails, usually with "keyword > error". I then have to modif

Re: Testing

2002-09-23 Thread jslivko
Andrew, I recieved your message loud and clear :) -- Jonathan Quoting "Rechenberg, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My messages have not been getting through. I've changed my reply-to > address and I'm seeing if this works. Please ignore > > Andrew Rechenberg > Infrastructure Team, Sherman F

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-30 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro wrote: > if [ ! ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install ] ; then > echo "an error occured" > exit #i don't know the command to exit a bash script > fi if ! { ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install; } then echo "an error

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 23:38 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | thanks to both of yall for the reply, but it didn't work. i copied/pasted | into a file, changed the EXCLUDE_LIST to something meaningful on my system, | but it doesn't work, it just prints out all the dirs in the dir that

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 30 April 2002 01:12 am, Michael Fratoni wrote: > ./configure --prefix=$1 && make && make install > Should work within a script, exiting if something fails. (as long as > the script and configure are in the same directory) That's not clear

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:38 am, christopher j bottaro wrote: > thanks to both of yall for the reply, but it didn't work. i > copied/pasted into a file, changed the EXCLUDE_LIST to something > meaningful on my system, but it doesn't work, it just p

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread christopher j bottaro
thanks to both of yall for the reply, but it didn't work. i copied/pasted into a file, changed the EXCLUDE_LIST to something meaningful on my system, but it doesn't work, it just prints out all the dirs in the dir that i'm in. i got another bash question though. i wanna execute the following

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro wrote: > EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3" > for DIR in `ls -d */` ; do > if [ $DIR in $EXCLUDE_LIST ] ; then > continue; > fi > echo $DIR > done Try this: EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3" for DIR in `ls -d */` ; do

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 22:37 29 Apr 2002, Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Monday 29 April 2002 09:39 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > |On 17:58 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | i wanna get this sudo (sp?) code working... | > | EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3" | > | for

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 29 April 2002 09:39 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote: > |On 17:58 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | i wanna get this sudo (sp?) code working... > | > | EXCLUDE_LIST = "dir1 dir2 dir3" > | for DIR in `ls -d */` ; do >

Re: testing if var is in list (bash)

2002-04-29 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 17:58 29 Apr 2002, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | i've been reading about advanced bash scripting on some webpage, but i can't | seem to find what i'm looking for. | | is there an easy way to tell if a var is in a list (a list like in a for loop | list)? is there a keywo

Re: testing site

2002-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's one for speed I know of... http://www.2wire.com/services/index.html Ragnar Wiencke wrote: > > > Hi there. > > I once read ( and used it) about a web site that was used to test ones > adsl connection for speed and security. Now I lost the address or URL. > Does anyone know that one or

Re: testing eth

2002-02-26 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:28:58AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there a command to test eth0 and eth1 on a machine to make sure that the > hardware actually works and hasn't failed? Up until two days ago my network > was working just fine and now it has stopped. I can't ping in or out. I >

Re: testing for a user in a script?

2001-12-11 Thread Dan Egli
Well, since RPMs have to be installed by a privleged user, I'd say just grep for the username in /etc/passwd. I.e. if [ -z `grep joefafanoush /etc/passed 2> /dev/null` ] ; then useradd -r joefafanoush; fi - Original Message - From: "Chad and Doria Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Redha

Re: testing for a user in a script?

2001-12-08 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 04:56:15PM -0600, Chad and Doria Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I am trying to create a SPEC file for a server and need to add a user for | the server to run under. I know I can do "useradd -r " and create | the user, how would I test to make sure this user does not

Re: testing for a user in a script?

2001-12-08 Thread Ed Wilts
On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 16:56, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote: > I am trying to create a SPEC file for a server and need to add a user for > the server to run under. I know I can do "useradd -r " and create > the user, how would I test to make sure this user does not exist before I > create it. Or, do

RE: testing ram

2001-04-11 Thread Steve Lee
Thanks .. it works great On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Kandy Danner wrote: > I found a great utility at www.freshmeat.net called memtestx86. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Lee > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:23 PM > To: Steve

RE: testing ram

2001-04-11 Thread Kandy Danner
I found a great utility at www.freshmeat.net called memtestx86. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Lee Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:23 PM To: Steve Lee Subject: testing ram does anyone know of any program to test ram in linux?

RE: testing ram

2001-04-11 Thread ABrady
On 11-Apr-01 Steve Lee opined: > does anyone know of any program to test ram > in linux? I used use Norton's software in > old days to test RAM. Search for memtest86 on freshmeat. Works for me. --- Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it. _

Re: testing ram

2001-04-11 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Steve Lee wrote: > does anyone know of any program to test ram > in linux? I used use Norton's software in > old days to test RAM. > > Thanks. > It is hard to do a good memory test when the OS is running. I preferrer to run memtest86 - it is a stand alone program that tests

Re: testing ram

2001-04-11 Thread eric clover
memtest86 http://reality.sgi.com/cbrady_denver/memtest86/ eric - Original Message - does anyone know of any program to test ram in linux? I used use Norton's software in old days to test RAM. Thanks. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL

Re: Testing for directories

2001-02-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:53:20AM -0500, rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Melvin wrote: | > For this we can simplify it alot and get find to do all the work for us... | > find . -type d -exec chmod 2770 {} \; | > ... and because the file name is never passed thr

Re: Testing for directories

2001-02-02 Thread Bret Hughes
Matthew Melvin wrote: > > 'cept xargs isn't going to preserve your spaces. Well it might i guess if > we get find to help out a bit... > > find . -type d -printf '"%p"\n' | xargs chmod 2770 what does the %p represent? Is that a find thing or a shell thing? Bret _

Re: Testing for directories

2001-02-02 Thread Matthew Melvin
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 9:53am (-0500), rpjday wrote: > On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Melvin wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 1:54pm (-), Tristan Hill wrote: > > > > > I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories > > > relative to the current path and change each di

Re: Testing for directories

2001-02-02 Thread rpjday
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Matthew Melvin wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 1:54pm (-), Tristan Hill wrote: > > > I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories > > relative to the current path and change each directories permission. The > > script fail to pickup directories

Re: Testing for directories

2001-02-02 Thread Matthew Melvin
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 at 1:54pm (-), Tristan Hill wrote: > I've got the following bash function to print the name of all directories > relative to the current path and change each directories permission. The > script fail to pickup directories with a space in the name though. > Corrections to t

Re: testing

2000-04-16 Thread Rajagopal Subash
Hi I started receing them correctly. DO not why still few of you can not receive them fully. -Original Message- From: Eddie Strohmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, April 15, 2000 11:01 AM Subject: testing >List still not working. I see bits

Re: testing

2000-04-15 Thread Hidong Kim
Johnny wrote: > On Monday I called Redhat and since their receptionist wouldn't say > whether the list was down I called Redhat back and talked to their > paid support people twice. I got the same guy twice so I guess they > don't actually have many on staff. > > The really amusing part was when

Re: testing ... is the list down, or have I been kicked off?

2000-04-14 Thread Martin Sieben
Ei, most probably the traffic is just VERY slow...hard to belive that nothing is happening... Martin On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, brian davison wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:01:19 -0700 > From: brian davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: test

Re: testing

2000-04-14 Thread Rajagopal Subash
Yes.But for the last one week, I have not recd any mails. Is something wrong with the mailing list server?. Subash -Original Message- From: Steve Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: RedHat Maillist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 2:01 AM Subject: testing >is anyone getting

RE: testing

2000-04-14 Thread pranav . bhushan
Title: RE: testing yeah !! -Original Message- From: Steve Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 10:36 AM To: RedHat Maillist Subject: testing is anyone getting my email. respond. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe&qu

Re: testing

2000-04-14 Thread Clare Teoh
Steve, I have been getting just a few mails from redhat for the past few days. I sent a test mail yesterday and have yet to see it on the list. Steve Lee wrote: > > is anyone getting my email. > respond. > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -

Re: testing

2000-04-14 Thread brian davison
Hi Steve the mail from red hat to here has been very spotty (almost non existant) since the 8th. brian :) *** At 10:05 PM 4/11/00 -0700, you wrote: >is anyone getting my email. >respond. > > >-- >To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" >as the

Re: testing

2000-04-13 Thread John P. Verel
Yes, but the list seems to have crashed. On 04/11/00, 10:05:42PM -0700, Steve Lee wrote: > is anyone getting my email. > respond. > > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subjec

RE: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Mark Basil
yep -Original Message- From: Steve Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 1:06 AM To: RedHat Maillist Subject: testing is anyone getting my email. respond. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject. -- To unsubscribe: mail

RE: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
I got it. > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 1:06 AM > To: RedHat Maillist > Subject: testing > > is anyone getting my email. > respond. > > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the

RE: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Mike Lewis
Yes, at least I did. > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 10:06 PM > To: RedHat Maillist > Subject: testing > > > is anyone getting my email. > respond. > > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"

Re: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Rick Forrister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > is anyone getting my email. respond. No! 8^)It appears that the redhat-lists were down for a couple of days and are just now coming back on-line. Could be stock shock. best rickf -- Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "To get something done

Re: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Johnny
Hi Steve Its not you. The redhat-list server has been screwed up since Friday. I don't understand why Redhat ducks the reliability issue regarding the 'redhat-list'. On Monday I called Redhat and since their receptionist wouldn't say whether the list was down I called Redhat back and talked t

Re: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Hyung Kim
yes On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Steve Lee wrote: > is anyone getting my email. > respond. > > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Fred Herman
No :0) Steve Lee wrote: > > is anyone getting my email. > respond. > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: testing

2000-04-13 Thread Mike Vevea
It came to me, but for some reason, the list has been VERY quite for the last few days. mikeV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: Testing system security vulnerability

2000-04-03 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 08:22:40AM -0500, Jim Baxter wrote: > -Hi All > I ask this question a while back but forgot to put a subject on it. I filter > messages with no subject and I guess some of you do also. > Here is my problem. I know little about system security from the internet > since we

Re: testing - ignore

1999-11-09 Thread Tom Dawes-Gamble
Thank very much for posting your test. I will be testing some mail generating programs and I have been looking for some people to help with the test. I'll add you address to the list. jwalsh wrote: > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -- Tom D

Re: TESTING IMAPD. Disregard

1998-05-30 Thread Steve Hazelett
Have you thought about testing your email by sending it to yourself and not the list? It works fine. Just send it to yourself on your ISP and it will bounce back to you when you check your mail again. "Paul Fontenot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | > <-+- - - - - -- -