Re: kernel compiling

2000-10-13 Thread lee johnson
> > > > > basically I just copied over new system.map and bzImage file renaming to > > my current set of modules.. > > > > isn't this right? > > > No, it isn't. When you compile a new kernel, you also need to compile a > new set of modules. IF you are compiling another copy of the same kerne

Re: kernel compiling

2000-10-13 Thread lee johnson
> > > 1) Not getting into Windows is a good thing.. why use it when you have > Linux?:) roflol.yuppers..well i gotta have windows at least "at the moment". i have some games for friends over lan/enternet but mainly for apps like access AND mainly my scannercanonscan USB is NOT sup

Re: kernel compiling

2000-10-13 Thread Statux
> i'm NOT running lilo tired of it messing with my boot sector and not > being able to get into windows anymore ...geez > > so i'm going through loadlin. 1) Not getting into Windows is a good thing.. why use it when you have Linux?:) 2) lilo will start DOS (which will then load Windows)... I

Re: kernel compiling

2000-10-13 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, lee johnson wrote: > just wondering if there is an "update/current" page anywhere on the > issue of kernel compiling... > I'm using redhat 6.2 ... > sometimes I have no luck.getting unresolved symbols and don't > remember what causes them > > > basic

Re: kernel compiling question

1998-06-04 Thread Clemens Adler
Brian, That nothing to worry about, you could even live with it, but since it's not nice: there is a file /etc/conf.modules, which is used by modprobe on startup to look for modules that should be loaded give information to them ... I'm not sure when it is generated, at some point definitly becaus

Re: kernel compiling

1998-06-02 Thread Zoki
On Fri, 29 May 1998, Claire Bradford wrote: ->Ray Curtis wrote: ->> ->> > "r" == ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ->> ->> r> ->> r> This message was not delivered to ->> r> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->> r> TFS Admin was informed with a copy of thi

Re: Kernel Compiling

1998-06-01 Thread buntin
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, David Pellegrino wrote: > > The directory make zImage puts the file is /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot > and I copied it to /boot. I saved the original lilo.conf as lilo.old and > adjusted the lilo.conf to call the zImage instead of > vmlinuz2.0.something-something. And rebo

Re: Kernel Compiling

1998-06-01 Thread David Pellegrino
The directory make zImage puts the file is /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot and I copied it to /boot. I saved the original lilo.conf as lilo.old and adjusted the lilo.conf to call the zImage instead of vmlinuz2.0.something-something. And rebooted, even after I made these changes in the lilo it still

Re: Kernel Compiling

1998-06-01 Thread Vidiot
>Hello all. I just recompiled my kernel, loaded it onto a floppy and >booted it. It works fine and does what it's supposed to (mostly). But it >doesn't make the new kernel image the permenent one. Unless I boot from >the floppy, it returns to the old kernel. I tried messing around with the >l

Re: kernel compiling

1998-05-29 Thread Matt Housh
See our previous posts, under the subject "Problematic Postings" or similar. --- Matt Housh email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MicroComputer SpecialistUniversity of Tulsa Engi

Re: Problematic posting ( << Re: kernel compiling)

1998-05-29 Thread Federico Strati
hi Claire, hi all, Claire Bradford wrote: > > Ray Curtis wrote: > > > > > "r" == ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > r> > > r> This message was not delivered to > > r> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > r> TFS Admin was informed with a copy of thi

Re: kernel compiling

1998-05-29 Thread Claire Bradford
Ray Curtis wrote: > > > "r" == ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > r> > r> This message was not delivered to > r> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > r> TFS Admin was informed with a copy of this message > r> Sender was informed with a copy of this messa

Re: kernel compiling

1998-05-29 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
>after I reboot I get a slew of unresolved symbols flying across the >screen, did I miss something? >Thanks In advance These unresolved sybols are of the modules that you didn't compile in the kernel. Just remove them. >Brian Igmar -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the M

Re: kernel compiling

1998-05-28 Thread Ray Curtis
> "r" == ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: r> r> This message was not delivered to r> [EMAIL PROTECTED] r> TFS Admin was informed with a copy of this message r> Sender was informed with a copy of this message r>

Re: kernel compiling

1998-05-28 Thread Brian C Hand
Thanks that did the trick Brian On Thu, 28 May 1998, Ray Curtis wrote: > > You forgot to move the older /lib/modules/2.0.xx out of the way before > you did a make modules_install. > > Do this then go back to /usr/src/linux and do another > make modules_install. > > > > > > "bch" ==

Re: kernel compiling

1998-05-28 Thread Ray Curtis
You forgot to move the older /lib/modules/2.0.xx out of the way before you did a make modules_install. Do this then go back to /usr/src/linux and do another make modules_install. > "bch" == Brian C Hand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bch> Hello I am kind of new to compiling new kernels a

Re: kernel compiling errors

1998-05-02 Thread David E. Fox
On Sat, 02 May 1998, Cam Vetter wrote: >vfatfs_syms.c:69: redefinition of `vfat_fs_type' >vfatfs_syms.c:15: `vfat_fs_type' previously defined here >vfatfs_syms.c:78: redefinition of `vfat_syms' >vfatfs_syms.c:24: `vfat_syms' previously defined here This looks suspiciously like if a stray #includ

Re: kernel compiling errors

1998-05-02 Thread Linus Ã…kerlund
On Sat, 2 May 1998, Cam Vetter wrote: > I have been trying to recompile the kernel, using the source that comes with > RedHat 5 (i.e. 2.0.32). I have applied the fat32 patch which I obtained > from: > Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong and what I need to do to fix it. I > know the fat3