cache
is full. That is what the kernel code says anyway. So go ahead with that
knowledge if cinik isn't the problem.
HTH
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002
Michael Fratoni wrote:
> I thought 1-15 was all that was physically possible. It is certainly all
> that is available on my i686 machines.
Physically possible, yes. However, on smp machines, you enter a different ball
game all together. The most obvious notification of this would be in dm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 10:25 pm, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > I thought 1-15 was all that was physically possible. It is certainly
> > all that is available on my i686 machines.
>
> on smp machines I think things get interesting. The following is
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:15, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 25 September 2002 09:41 am, Tom Pollerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:48:14 -0600
>
> > > > Are you sure that irq 31 is what you want for eth0? Is that a
> > > > typo?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 09:41 am, Tom Pollerman wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:48:14 -0600
> > > Are you sure that irq 31 is what you want for eth0? Is that a
> > > typo?
> >
> > What's wrong with IRQ 31? My onboard eepro100 comes up
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:48:14 -0600
"Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Pollerman wrote:
>
> > > Sep 21 16:23:38 ns2 xinetd[11924]: warning: /etc/hosts.allow,
> > > line 16: host name/address mismatch: 194.119.255.146 !=
> > > mail.cockx.be
>
> 194.119.255.146 => 194-119-25
Tom Pollerman wrote:
> > Sep 21 16:23:38 ns2 xinetd[11924]: warning: /etc/hosts.allow, line
> > 16: host name/address mismatch: 194.119.255.146 != mail.cockx.be
194.119.255.146 => 194-119-255-145.KPNBelgium.be
mail.cockx.be => 62.166.70.67
xinetd has a right to complain.
> Are y
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:41:25 -0700
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can anyone help me diagnose this problem -- my log files are being
> intermittently overwhelmed with these messages for the kernal, so
> much so they brought down the box:
>
> Sep 24 17:11:10 ns2 kernel: NET:
