]
On Behalf Of Emmanuel Seyman
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bug tracking tool
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:40:10PM +0530, santosh kumar wrote:
>
> Guys really really fed up with bug tracking tool installation. I
I've no idea if it's easy
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:40:10PM +0530, santosh kumar wrote:
>
> Guys really really fed up with bug tracking tool installation. I
I've no idea if it's easy to install or not but have you tried mantis?
http://mantisbt.sourceforge.net/>
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[
I had a similar situation. The system clock was off by 1 hour. I would
reset the system clock and it would switch back to be 1 hour behind. The
problem was that the hardware clock and system clock were not synchronized.
Here is a link that talks about how to synchronize them.
http://www.craic.c
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Today's Topics:
>
>5. Re: bug in zoneinfo? (LAST FIRST)
>7. Re: bug in zoneinfo? (Todd A. Jacobs)
> --__--__--
Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:01:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: LAST FIRST <[EMAIL PROTE
On 16 Feb 2003, Mats Tegner wrote:
> live in Sweden, the timezone is set to Europe/Stockholm. Or is this a
> bug in the hardware clock. I'm running Red hat 8.0 with Kernel
> 2.4.18-24.8.0 on an IBM Intellistation M Pro 6219.
Have you set daylight savings properly? This sounds like a likely place
Me too, DO you choose Adjust the clock via time zone or by syncing with remote time
server?
--- Mats Tegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear Friends,
>My system is behaving strange, if I don't sync my system clock with a
>network time-server, my system clock shows the wrong time. If the time
>is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 November 2002 08:56 pm, Peter Zengota wrote:
> There is currently an open bug in BugZilla regarding this issue:
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
>
> Seems to be widespread issues with rpm in RedHat 8...
Yes, m
There is currently an open bug in BugZilla regarding this issue:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
Seems to be widespread issues with rpm in RedHat 8...
From: Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 November 2002 06:41 am, Michael Grosseck wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed on several computers the same problem with the rpm-system.
> Sometimes if I erase or install a pakage the process goes sleeping and
> doesn't wake up again. I run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:22:09 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> How do I report a bug to RedHat?
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9xGVF0iMVcrivHFQRAkF2AKCAZbNCIyuWjqyGeS/Q5C
http://bugzilla.redhat.com
HTH,
Jonathan
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 14:22, MartÃn Marqués wrote:
> How do I report a bug to RedHat?
>
> --
> Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
> si podés usar PostgreSQL?
> -
> Mart
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:23:47PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> I was on Mosfet's web site this afternoon and spotted an extract from
> Red Hat's kdebase rpm:
>
> - get rid of Taiwanese Flag in KDE (bug #70235)
>
> Curious as to what kind of bug requires removing a flag, I went
> over to R
On Jue 15 Ago 2002 13:53, Mike Burger wrote:
> Have you given any thought to upgrading to one of the latest releases,
> supported by the postfix group? They're well past the 2001 releases
> that RedHat's still using/putting out.
As I said, I am going to update the whole server to RH 7.3, whi
Have you given any thought to upgrading to one of the latest releases,
supported by the postfix group? They're well past the 2001 releases that
RedHat's still using/putting out.
Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> There's an annoying bug in Postfix from the 7.1 powertools, and ther
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 09:06:59AM +0200, Aad van Lieburg wrote:
> Hi,
> I read about a bug in RH7.2 iptables, due to debugging code, with NAT /
> mangle.
> Now I'm not sure about this: Is this bug still there in RH7.3?
>
>From www.netfilter.org homepage:
* This bug has not yet been fixed in any
Kjetil Tjensvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a bug in make dep or make bzImage when
> compiling the rh 7.2 2.4.7-10 kernel.
> If you disable File systems /devpts and keep unix98
> PTY checked to y ,you will get an error message during
> boot saying mounting local filsystems, failed due
OK so I tried this and still doesnt work.
Can somebody help me how to setup GUI for login?
-Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug in RH 7.2?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Isaac Liu wrote:
>Whenever I change the network configuration
>using GNOME's GUI and after I reboot the
>machine I lost the GUI and got a console
>instead.
gdm is probably having a problem resolving your hostname. If you only hav
Poking around just a bit more, I find that Zshell has solved this
problem. While I've not used zsh, its documentation shows the ability
to 'typeset -U path' in a startup file. This tells the shell not to add
anything to the path that is already there. This would seem to be a
good feature to add
On 01/01/02, 10:15:34AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | So, it appears that conditional path modification is the only viable
> | option, short of major surgery. Cameron's rant is on point, IMHO.
>
> Oh, I dunno
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So, it appears that conditional path modification is the only viable
| option, short of major surgery. Cameron's rant is on point, IMHO.
Oh, I dunno.
I don't like conditional modification much - feels tacky - it
On 12/31/01, 12:15:42AM -0500, Devon wrote:
>
> > See my note of a few minutes ago re: --noprofile option: tomorrow's
> > projects
>
> Well, that's probably more elegant, but I'd still advocate conditional
> path modification. ;)
>
Devon, et. al:
Well, turns out the --noprofile option idea d
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:04:39AM -0500, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
| > Perhaps I'm missing something here. Aren't the path modifications in
| > /etc/profile conditional? If they are already in the users path, they
| > shouldn't be added again. That being the case, re-sourcin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 December 2001 12:04 am, John P Verel wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm missing something here. Aren't the path modifications in
> > /etc/profile conditional? If they are already in the users path, they
> > shouldn't be added again. That being the ca
On 12/30/01, 10:29:29PM -0500, Devon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 30 December 2001 06:43 pm, John P Verel wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> > As I use gnome with the gnome display manager, I end up starting
> > /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, passing the argument "gnome-s
On 12/30/01, 06:34:03PM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 06:43:02PM -0500, John P Verel wrote:
> > As I use gnome with the gnome display manager, I end up starting
> > /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, passing the argument "gnome-session". I have
> > this line in my Xsession, at line numbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 December 2001 06:43 pm, John P Verel wrote:
Hi John,
> As I use gnome with the gnome display manager, I end up starting
> /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, passing the argument "gnome-session". I have
> this line in my Xsession, at line number 93
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 06:43:02PM -0500, John P Verel wrote:
> As I use gnome with the gnome display manager, I end up starting
> /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, passing the argument "gnome-session". I have
> this line in my Xsession, at line number 93:
>
>exec -l $SHELL -c "gnome-session"
>
>
On 12/30/01, 03:36:15PM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
---snip---
> > If one logs in under X, apparently login and X BOTH start login shells.
> > I say this because what I see happening is that the path appendices from
> > my /etc/profile and my ~/.bash_profile are added twice. This does not >
> > h
I've only a few seconds right now--have to trot off--but I'm afraid you don't
quite have it.
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 02:33:14PM -0500, John P Verel wrote:
> When init invokes getty, getty forks and creates (at level 5), consoles
> 1 through 6 and, for X, console 7.
Well, no. Actually, init spaw
I stand to correct myself on this.
Having nothing better to do with the penultimate day of this year but to
trace through the Red Hat init and login process in more painful
detail, it would now seem thus:
When init invokes getty, getty forks and creates (at level 5), consoles
1 through 6 and, fo
As I'm just now off on holiday, upon return my New Year's resolution
will be to fill in a bugzilla report.
Cheers to all.
John
On 12/26/01, 04:14:08PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 10:44:58PM -0500, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Is there a bug in the Red H
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 10:44:58PM -0500, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Is there a bug in the Red Hat bash initialization scripts, /etc/bashrc?
[...]
| 1) Xsession starts a bash login session.
| 2) gnome-terminal starts a non-login session.
[...]
| The root of this, I think, is that la
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> KSCD does not have permission for a user to write to the local CDDB database.
> I had to SU to root and chmod -R a+w cddb in /usr/share/apps/kscd. I consider
> this a minor annoyance, but worth looking into. I'm not sure who's to blame
> here, KDE or
** Reply to message from Steve Kieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 20 Dec
2000 01:19:31 -0800 (PST)
> Hi, all I think it is too soon to say but the
> performance is worse that if I run 2.2.17 with my
> computer, My computer hang once with 18 after rather
> long up time, never like that in 2.2.17. An
On 20-Dec-2000 Steve Kieu opined:
>
> Hi, all I think it is too soon to say but the
> performance is worse that if I run 2.2.17 with my
> computer, My computer hang once with 18 after rather
> long up time, never like that in 2.2.17. And yeah,
> other performance seems to be worse. Now I try to
jitterbug is pretty cool - working as a cgi app it is really quite flexible
depending on your needs. should be able to find the source pretty easily
also.
tim
On Friday, September 01, 2000 7:39 AM, Carlos [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> >
>
> HELLO ALL.
>
> Does any one know any web based b
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 02:38:34PM -0700, Carlos wrote:
> HELLO ALL.
>
> Does any one know any web based bug reporting software I can run on my linux
> web server.
gnats
bugzilla
Neither work well "out of the box". I imagine there's other packages
in the works which use Zope or PHP.
--
S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> ooh, where? I haven't seen em.
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Rick Forrister wrote:
> The Powertools & CPAN CD images can be, I believe, downloaded as
> images, and burned by the user at home.
Hi Charles!
One point, for powertools, at least, is
You'll find all the networki
ooh, where? I haven't seen em.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Rick Forrister wrote:
> The Powertools & CPAN CD images can be, I believe, downloaded as
> images, and burned by the user at home.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
> More on this. Closer inspection of the zoot rpms show that there are
> no rpms for the Red Hat Getting Started Guide, Reference Guide or
> Installation Guide. There is, in fact, an rpm for current manual
> pages.
>
> It would appear that the rpm for the Red Hat manuals was left out of
> the zoo
-
From: "John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "redhat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in zoot: out of date documentation!
> More on this. Closer inspection of the zoot rpms show that there are
> no rpms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> More on this. Closer inspection of the zoot rpms show that there are
> no rpms for the Red Hat Getting Started Guide, Reference Guide or
> Installation Guide. There is, in fact, an rpm for current manual
> pages.
> It would appear that the rpm for the Red Hat manuals
I encountered the same problem after a 6.1 to 6.2 upgrade. What I understand is
that the documentation comes now in a separate CD (iso image). Don't know
how you load them from that CD, since I have not loaded the documentation yet.
"John P. Verel" wrote:
>
> I appears that the zoot image
More on this. Closer inspection of the zoot rpms show that there are
no rpms for the Red Hat Getting Started Guide, Reference Guide or
Installation Guide. There is, in fact, an rpm for current manual
pages.
It would appear that the rpm for the Red Hat manuals was left out of
the zoot image. C
Agreed. It does give a lot more flexibility to local solutions. I
actually quoted your idea (with reference to you :) in an additional
comment to the bug report.
The problem is that RH has already started to overwrite the ppp.local
(unless they will revert that solution) and it's sort of too late
Gustav Schaffter wrote:
>
> Makes sense, Gordon.
>
> > Or... they could get jiggy and create /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ and run all of
> > the scripts in there!! :)
The more I think about it, the more I like the idea of
/etc/ppp/ip-up.d/. I created ip-up.local scripts in my EQL rpm, too.
They automat
Makes sense, Gordon.
Gustav
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> > OK, it seems that I was the only one having this problem(?).
>
> Probably not, the files were replaced by the isdn-config package.
>
> > Primarily, I'd like to know if this is the future, that the ip-up.local
>
Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> OK, it seems that I was the only one having this problem(?).
Probably not, the files were replaced by the isdn-config package.
> Primarily, I'd like to know if this is the future, that the ip-up.local
> is not 'local' any more.
Since you've already submitted a bug repo
I had a mail off list encouraging me to report the bug to bugzilla,
which I did.
The bugzilla ID is: 10567
Thanks, Craig.
Regards
Gustav
Gustav Schaffter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have found what I believe is a serious bug in the upgrade to RH6.2
> (zoot).
>
> In RH6.0 and RH6.1 there was no /et
OK, it seems that I was the only one having this problem(?).
Can anyone tell me where I should turn to get a comment from RedHat?
Bugzilla? (I've never tried to do a formal bug report before.)
Primarily, I'd like to know if this is the future, that the ip-up.local
is not 'local' any more.
Regar
Le 28.02.00 a 12:38, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" m'ecrivait :
)I still can't reproduce it here (running wu-ftpd-2.6.0-3). Which versions
)have you installed? Are you using any strange authentication methods
)(S/Key, OPIE, ...)? Local user or NIS? Any chance the users somehow got
)the same UID?
I ru
what does "ls -l /home" show? are the home directories of your users world
writeable?
nitesh.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
>
> > You're right on this example.
> > Look at this trace (I am user tressens. jarcas is another user
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
> You're right on this example.
> Look at this trace (I am user tressens. jarcas is another user) :
I still can't reproduce it here (running wu-ftpd-2.6.0-3). Which versions
have you installed? Are you using any strange authentication methods
(S/Key, O
Le 28.02.00 a 11:54, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" m'ecrivait :
)On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
)
)> Sorry, I made a mistake. A user can change the mode of a file, even if it
)> doesn't belong to him. (with the command chmod).
)
)What permissions does the file currently have? I can't repr
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
> Sorry, I made a mistake. A user can change the mode of a file, even if it
> doesn't belong to him. (with the command chmod).
What permissions does the file currently have? I can't reproduce it here
right out of the box:
ftp> cd /etc
250 CWD command
Le 28.02.00 a 11:15, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" m'ecrivait :
)On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
)
)> I discovered a big problem in ftp running on my box.
)>
)> Through ftp, any user can set the owner of any file, even if it doesn't
)> belong to him.
)
)How? Which commands do you send to
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
> I discovered a big problem in ftp running on my box.
>
> Through ftp, any user can set the owner of any file, even if it doesn't
> belong to him.
How? Which commands do you send to change the owner?
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROT
Smack in the middle of the RedHat.com support section.
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Have libcrypt installed? Included in the glibc RPM...
root@delirium.~# locate libcrypt
/lib/libcrypt-2.0.7.so
/lib/libcrypt.so.1
/usr/lib/libcrypt.a
/usr/lib/libcrypt.so
root@delirium.~# rpm -qf `locate libcrypt`
glibc-2.0.7-7
glibc-2.0.7-7
glibc-devel-2.0.7-7
glibc-devel-2.0.7-7
HTH, M
>
>I've been trying to write a program in C to do user authentication and
>allow them to log into my machine. The problem is that it won't compile
>in 5.0. It gives me compile errors in tmp files.
>/tmp/cca017411.o(.text+0x356): undefined reference to `crypt'
>
>The program will compile on 4.2
At 17:38 03-05-98 -0400, William T Wilson wrote:
>Just out of curiosity... why are you doing this at all? :)
The thing came up in a Usenet group. I wanted a quick (and dirty?) way to
illustrate that SCSI utilizes the CPU much less than IDE - thus making the
system more responsive. My result was t
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Troels Arvin wrote:
> When the rc5des software is not running, the following procedure
> takes around one minute:
> time cat /dev/hda1 >/dev/null
> (CPU usage is around 30%)
Just out of curiosity... why are you doing this at all? :)
> hda1 is an IDE disk (PIO4) of around 3
On Sun, 3 May 1998, David E. Fox wrote:
> If you want to specifically tell the system to run your process only
> when not doing anything else, then use 'nice -19' rather than 'nice'.
Unfortunately, you have the numbers backward. Negative numbers have a
HIGHER priority than regular processes. Y
At 11:55 03-05-98 -0700, David E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>'nice' by itself doesn't guarantee that the nice'd
>process will always run at the lowest priority -- it only guarantees
>that the process will run at a relatively lower priority than other
>processes on the system.
OK. But in my op
On Sun, 03 May 1998, Troels Arvin wrote:
>When the rc5des software is not running, the following procedure
>takes around one minute:
>time cat /dev/hda1 >/dev/null
>(CPU usage is around 30%)
>
>When the rc5des software is running, the same procedure takes
>15 minutes ('time' reports CPU usage a
66 matches
Mail list logo
