-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-Jul-2002/10:25 +0200, Ximo Llacer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How Could I run in based windows machine the X-Windows to connect my
>linux server ?
>
>Is there any software to do this ?
Cygwin/XFree86:
http://www.cygwin.com/xfree/
Tony
- --
Look at cygwin.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Calbazana, Al
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: XWindows Clients for Win32
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knows of a good, and free of co
David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Matt Kraner wrote:
> >
> >> Were is a good place to get software for Xwindows
> >>
> >>
> >It depends on what you want. Good places to start looking:
> >http://www.linuxapps.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Matt Kraner wrote:
>
>> Were is a good place to get software for Xwindows
>>
>>
>It depends on what you want. Good places to start looking:
>http://www.linuxapps.com
>http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/software.html
>ht
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Matt Kraner wrote:
> Were is a good place to get software for Xwindows
>
>
It depends on what you want. Good places to start looking:
http://www.linuxapps.com
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/software.html
http://freshmeat.net
http://www.rahul.net/kenton/xsites.html
http://www.vlu
In the file /etc/inittab, look for
id:5:initdefault:
and change it too
id:3:initdefault:
david
P.S. please don't send your mail in html format, some of us can't read it
unless go through contortions
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe all you have to do is run Xconfigu
>-Original Message-
>From: drdos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2001 3:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Xwindows
>
>I just install Red Hat 6, I would like to know how that I can get Xwindows
>to stop loading when the system is reboot were I can have the Te
Hi Matt!
> I just install Red Hat 6, I would like to know how that I can get Xwindows to stop
>loading when the system is reboot were I can have the Text screen back...
As root, open /etc/inittab and look for the line with label "initdefault". Change it
from 5 to 3 and reboot.
[]s, Ferna
in /etc/inittab you've a line looking like
id:5:initdefault:
change it to
id:3:initdefault:
this gives you a text login screen
if once logged you want to start X, then just enter the command "startx"
hth,
A 23:09 20/02/2001 -0500, vous avez écrit :
>I just install Red Hat 6, I would like
I believe
all you have to do is run Xconfigurator from the terminal window, after you
have set-up X and it checks your configuration you will have an option to start
X automatically, choose no to this.
I know
there is an easier way but done know it.
-Original
Message-
From: d
> One more thing... don't post to the list in html format... it wastes
> bandwidth and many people won't see your posts (like me except I am
> testing my procmail filter after making some changes).
His mail didn't come through as HTML.. just MIME encoded which pine took
care of without a problem.
change the runlevel from 5 to 3 :)
as root, edit /etc/inittab
near the beginning, there's a line that prolly looks something like:
id:5:initdefault:
change the 5 to a 3 so it reads
id:3:initdefault:
Reboot. Should work good.
:)
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, drdos wrote:
> I just install Red Hat
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, drdos spewed into the bitstream:
d>I just install Red Hat 6, I would like to know how that I can get
d>Xwindows to stop loading when the system is reboot were I can have
d>the Text screen back...
In the file /etc/inittab change this line:
id:5:initdefault:
to this:
id:3:i
; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Miroslav Skoric
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Xwindows firewall?
>
>
> brian davison wrote:
> >
> > This isn't an xwindows firewall it's an
> interf
brian davison wrote:
>
> This isn't an xwindows firewall it's an interface to the firewall setup
> from an xwindow... and this is good,,, because the firewall , in order
> to be effective must run at a much lower level than an xwindow... but it
> can have its setup done in a gui just
> I wonder if there is a firewall for RH 6.2 that is capable to be
> configured and run under Gnome and/or KDE or similar like that (like
> ATGuard or Blackice under Win.).
We try to keep an updated list of firewalls for Linux at
LinuxSecurity.com:
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/resources/
and w
This isn't an xwindows firewall it's an interface to the firewall setup
from an xwindow... and this is good,,, because the firewall , in order
to be effective must run at a much lower level than an xwindow... but it
can have its setup done in a gui just fine.
brian:)
***
Misko:
This one was recently mentioned on the list. Looks good though I have not
tried yet.
http://firestarter.sourceforge.net/
Eddie Strohmier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Miroslav Skoric
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:45 AM
To:
"Hossein S. Zadeh" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:28:15PM -0700, Stephen King wrote:
> > > Is it just my installations or it is a fact that xwindows, and say KDE or
> > > Gnome, are slower than any win95/98/NT/2000 installation on the same
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cameron Simpson
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 5:37 AM
To: dattatraya
Subject: Re: xwindows
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 03:28:26PM +0530, dattatraya wrote:
| i created a non privileged user on my linux box
here is hp's answer to i386 compared to i586
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Gnome/263/25/3784932/
On Thu, 25 May 2000 11:25:53 -0400
Jeff Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#You may be able to speed it up a bit by recompiling the rpms or whatever to
#your processor speed. I think they general
You may be able to speed it up a bit by recompiling the rpms or whatever to
your processor speed. I think they generally come compiled for a 386 and if
you don't comile them you really won't get the true performance.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen King [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:28:15PM -0700, Stephen King wrote:
> > Is it just my installations or it is a fact that xwindows, and say KDE or
> > Gnome, are slower than any win95/98/NT/2000 installation on the same
> > machine?
> [...]
Let me set the
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:28:15PM -0700, Stephen King wrote:
> Is it just my installations or it is a fact that xwindows, and say KDE or
> Gnome, are slower than any win95/98/NT/2000 installation on the same
> machine?
[...]
Could you elaborate on the "slower" a bit? What exactly is percieved as
Uncle Meat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are other, lighter, faster desktops (XFCE andIceWM to name a couple).
> They just don't have the right screen layout and gazillions of icons and
> programs attached to make life easy for newbies.
I'm not sure what you're talking about exactly, but
On 24-May-00 Stephen King opined:
> Hi,
>
> Is it just my installations or it is a fact that xwindows, and say KDE or
> Gnome, are slower than any win95/98/NT/2000 installation on the same
> machine? I'm trying hard to convince my wife not to go back to windows,
> but I've done three installati
Hi Stephen,
it is not a problem of KDE, it s a prob of XFree. You have to do some changes
in /etc/XF86Config. Please look at
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/
there you will find some help.
And look at website from XFree86.
bye
Marco
> Is there a utility to stretch my desktop
Try xvidtune. Is your monitor listed in the list when you set up the
XF86Config file?
-Eric Wood
>-Original Message-
>From: Stephen Hargrove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>Is there a utility to stretch my desktop to fill the screen? I'm using KDE
>if that matters.
--
To unsubscribe:
Raging Bull, Inc.
100 Brickstone Square
Andover, MA 01810
978-247-5554
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hargrove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XWindows
You wrote:
>
>I'
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Stephen Hargrove wrote:
> left of the monitor screen, but the on the right side there's about 1 to 1.5
> inches of black between the end of the desktop and the edge of the screen.
> I'm wanting to adjust it so that it aligns with the right as it does with
xvidtune
--
Dunc
You wrote:
>
>I'm not sure what you're asking for. Can you explain more?
Sure. When I startx, KDE fires up. The desktop aligns perfectly with the
left of the monitor screen, but the on the right side there's about 1 to 1.5
inches of black between the end of the desktop and the edge of the scr
I'm not sure what you're asking for. Can you explain more?
---
Jay Guerette
Operations Group
Raging Bull, Inc.
100 Brickstone Square
Andover, MA 01810
978-247-5554
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hargrove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
David Taylor wrote:
>
>
> OK. Would it cause lasting damage, or just interference? That is, I've
Don't worry, if you still see the image, it's in the monitor's range, so you won't
damage it.
Damaging the monitor in the X context means choosing H/V frequencies beyond the
monitor's capabiliti
-Original Message-
From: David Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, June 25, 1998 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: XWindows damaging my monitor?!
>You know what bothers me? Windows 95
8-)
regards
David Buddrige
> -Original Message-
> From: David Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 1996 11:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: XWindows damaging my monitor?!
>
> ps.
> You know what bothers me? Windows 95 doe
Fred Whipple wrote:
>
> >The speakers are magnetically-shielded. I have no idea about the monitor
> >tho'. But even if the monitor's not, the speakers wouldn't be the problem
> >if they are shielded, or would they?
>
> Well, technically, magnetic shielding is a two way thing. That is, though
Dan Cornilescu wrote:
> David Taylor wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a 15in something-or-other. I am not sure what brand it is. On
> > the back it says "LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP." and "50-60Hz" and "Model
> > No:CM-1565MCLR".
>
> You wouldn't believe what 2 (inspired) minutes of web search c
>> What is the monitor sitting next to, specifically what is near the
lower-right
>> corner of the monitor. Sounds like an external force is causing what you are
>> seeing (gotta be the X-Files :-)
>
>A speaker. 480W GLi 768. It's turned off.
>Could this be the problem, even tho' it's turned of
David Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a 15in something-or-other. I am not sure what brand it is. On
> the back it says "LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP." and "50-60Hz" and "Model
> No:CM-1565MCLR".
You wouldn't believe what 2 (inspired) minutes of web search can
do!
http://www.liteontc.com/
http://
David Taylor wrote:
>
> >> I have a 15in something-or-other. I am not sure what brand it is. On
> >> the back it says "LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP." and "50-60Hz" and "Model
> >> No:CM-1565MCLR".
>
> >Isn't by any chance the 50-60Hz refering to the AC power supply
> >frequency?
>
> I don't know..
David Taylor wrote:
>
> > What is the monitor sitting next to, specifically what is near the lower-right
> > corner of the monitor. Sounds like an external force is causing what you are
> > seeing (gotta be the X-Files :-)
>
> A speaker. 480W GLi 768. It's turned off.
> Could this be the prob
>A speaker. 480W GLi 768. It's turned off.
>Could this be the problem, even tho' it's turned off?
>David Taylor.
It may be turned off, but the magnet in the speaker isn't. Is it designed
to be used next to a monitor, i.e., shielded?
MB
--
System Administrator - Finnigan FT/MS - Madison WI. U
> What is the monitor sitting next to, specifically what is near the lower-right
> corner of the monitor. Sounds like an external force is causing what you are
> seeing (gotta be the X-Files :-)
A speaker. 480W GLi 768. It's turned off.
Could this be the problem, even tho' it's turned off?
Re
>> I have a 15in something-or-other. I am not sure what brand it is. On
>> the back it says "LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP." and "50-60Hz" and "Model
>> No:CM-1565MCLR".
>Isn't by any chance the 50-60Hz refering to the AC power supply
>frequency?
I don't know... it might be. It's located beneath th
David Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a 15in something-or-other. I am not sure what brand it is. On
> the back it says "LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP." and "50-60Hz" and "Model
> No:CM-1565MCLR".
Isn't by any chance the 50-60Hz refering to the AC power supply
frequency?
--
PLEASE read the Red
>In Linux, I have the same settings. I had the refresh rate set at
>60Hz. Lately, I have noticed a flicker in the bottom right corner of
>the screen. I remembered reading that the wrong settings in XWindows
>can damage a monitor. So, I lowered the refresh rate to 56Hz. I can't
>really see any
So I need to make the settings for 8bpp AND 16bpp AND 32bpp?? This might
be the problem as I only set one of them.
Thank. I'll give it a try.
Stacy
>
> You need to set your modes in xf86config accordingly...such as 8bpp
> w/640x480, 1024x768, etc...and 16bpp accordingly as wellif you hav
You need to set your modes in xf86config accordingly...such as 8bpp
w/640x480, 1024x768, etc...and 16bpp accordingly as wellif you have
done this, the only thing that I can think that you might be overlooking is
the Ctrl-Alt-minus key which will change your screen sizes respectively...
--
Stacy Brodzik wrote:
>
> I recently installed RH5.0 on my PC and just ran through xf86config
> yesterday.
I would recommend using the much more advanced Xconfigurator program
that comes with Red Hat 5.0;
--cut--
capella:~$ rpm -qi Xconfigurator
Name: Xconfigurator Distrib
Please just get a distribution ($1.49 and up +shpg. at Linux.Mall)
and look at the five browsers, 'cause I can't choose, either,and you'll
be able to do your stuff on the web. Of the eight Xwindows on my
CD's, I find them all useful, but am comfortable with FVWM95 and
can see why it is so popular.
Scott Tyson wrote:
>
> I have been very interested in KDE since it looks very much like CDE, which
> I have on a HP-UX Workstation at work. I just got it so I'm learning it as
> well.
Why not use CDE from redhat? No learning required :)
It works great for me. No problems on 5.0, a few instalati
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/14/98, at 7:04 PM, Dan Cornilescu wrote:
>Scott Tyson wrote:
>>
>> I have been very interested in KDE since it looks very much like CDE,
which
>> I have on a HP-UX Workstation at work. I just got it so I'm learning it
as
>> well.
>
>Why not use
On 14 Jun, Scott Tyson wrote:
> MY current tools of choice for NT are MS office 97, Allaire Homesite
> 3.0/Frontpage 98 for my HTML, Adobe Photoshop for graphics, GNU Emacs
> sometimes (trying to learn it), Calypso for Email, NewsExpress for usenet,
> CDValet for Music CDs, Pirch32 fir IRC and Gam
"Scott Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>xmcd has the most features, but is motif-based
>>It seems to build fine with lesstif, however, and there is a statically
>>linked binary available as well.
>
>Thank you. But off course being a bit green here can you please elaberate
>on
>what this a
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/14/98, at 9:24 PM, Stelios Bounanos wrote:
>As a proud and regular user of more than 8 cd-players :)) I can recommend
>the following, in order of personal preference:
>
>
>TCD, http://flow.ml.org/tcd/
>
>xmcd, http://sunsite.unc.edu/~cddb/xmcd/
>
As a proud and regular user of more than 8 cd-players :)) I can recommend
the following, in order of personal preference:
TCD, http://flow.ml.org/tcd/
xmcd, http://sunsite.unc.edu/~cddb/xmcd/
kscd (part of KDE, http://www.kde.org),
http://math.cornell.edu/~wuebben/kscd/kscd.html
(KDE libs and
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Jack Hatfield wrote:
> OK RedHat 4.2. KFC 17" Smile monitor. Trident 9680. Had Xwindows working.
>
> 1. RedHat 5.0 works fabulous on this setup, 4.2 stopped working. All I get
> is jagged blue line at the bottom, can't do nothing without rebooting. Is
> there any other way
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/5/98, at 12:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello. I am fairly new to Linux (installed 4.2 a few months ago) and have
a
>few questions about XWindows:
>1. How can I use 320x240 mode on a Mach32 card without Using Doublescan?
the
>XF86Config file g
Brian Eith wrote:
> > I would like for my window-manager to startup after booting up. How can I
> > do this?
>
> Depends. If you want the entire login screen for everyone to be X based
> (which also means that after the anyone logs in they will in X windows),
> edit your /etc/inittab and change
> I would like for my window-manager to startup after booting up. How can I
> do this?
Depends. If you want the entire login screen for everyone to be X based
(which also means that after the anyone logs in they will in X windows),
edit your /etc/inittab and change the line that reads:
id:3:in
> "msd" == Michael S Dunsavage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
msd> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If I understand your question correctly, this is what you want to do: In
>> the "Screen" section, put the modes in the order you want them to come
>> up in; for example, this will cause 1024
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 15:50:01 -0400 Karl Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hello again, all
> Well, yesterday's fix to the set my X desktop has definitely
>helped.
>Now changing the resolution with the C-M-+ works, but the default
>viewing
>area is still
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:03:09 -0700 (PDT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi,
>
>If I understand your question correctly, this is what you want to do:
>In
>the "Screen" section, put the modes in the order you want them to come
>up in; for example, this will cause 1024x76
Oops,
make changes in /etc/X11/XF86Config under redhat - other versions of linux
put the file in different places but I've never seen it named anything
else.
Deke
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I understand your question correc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I understand your question correctly, this is what you want to do: In
> the "Screen" section, put the modes in the order you want them to come
> up in; for example, this will cause 1024x768 to be the default, with the
> other two available by C-M-+:
>
>
Ahh!!! I'll give that a shot...can't hurt at least. B-)
Thanks, Deke!
Karl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 2:03 PM
> To: Red Hat List
> Subject: Re: XWindows Display Size
>
>
Hi,
If I understand your question correctly, this is what you want to do: In
the "Screen" section, put the modes in the order you want them to come
up in; for example, this will cause 1024x768 to be the default, with the
other two available by C-M-+:
Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x48
BINGO! Thanks much!
Karl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 1998 1:31 PM
> To: Red Hat List
> Subject: Re: XWindows Video
>
> Look in /etc/X11/XF86Config and find the Virtual item in the
Look in /etc/X11/XF86Config and find the Virtual item in the Screen
section and comment that out or set it equal to the largest resolution
that you're using.
good luck!
Deke
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Karl Miller wrote:
> I'm sure one of my fellow Linux users knows this off the top of his head,
> I'
69 matches
Mail list logo
