Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Charles Galpin
Thanks for keeping this alive Bret :) This is certainly possible - comments below On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > Charles Galpin wrote: > > > Duncan > > > > I have been getting similar messages on a machine that has been acting up > > lately (and getting worse). It too has plenty of

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Bret Hughes
Charles Galpin wrote: > Duncan > > I have been getting similar messages on a machine that has been acting up > lately (and getting worse). It too has plenty of RAM and swap. I'm > starting to think a memory chip has gone bad, but it's not the kind of > thing you can test easily on an operational

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Duncan Hill
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Aldrich wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Duncan Hill wrote: > > is barely touched, and there is ~10M free RAM, and ~150M in buffers. > > Not what I'd consider a critical situation. > caching, which is the opposite behavior from Windows. *nod* This I know :) Thus the "n

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread John Aldrich
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Duncan Hill wrote: > Within the past 24 hours, a stable machine has started to generate > -> kernel: Unable to load interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > every couple of hours. Research indicates that this is a lack of RAM. > However, this system has 256M of physical, and the sam

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread John Aldrich
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Charles Galpin wrote: > Duncan > > I have been getting similar messages on a machine that has been acting up > lately (and getting worse). It too has plenty of RAM and swap. I'm > starting to think a memory chip has gone bad, but it's not the kind of > thing you can test eas

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Charles Galpin
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Duncan Hill wrote: > > "Burke, Thomas G." wrote: > > > > There's a memtest program out there somewhere... You follow it's > > instructions & it creates a boot disk for you, & then does a > > _thorough_ > > Ugh.. rebooting a live server to do a memory test isn't what I rea

RE: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
That's it! > -Original Message- > From: Gustav Schaffter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Unable to load interpreter > > Try: > > http://reality.sgi.com/cbrady_denver/

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Duncan Hill
> "Burke, Thomas G." wrote: > > There's a memtest program out there somewhere... You follow it's > instructions & it creates a boot disk for you, & then does a > _thorough_ Ugh.. rebooting a live server to do a memory test isn't what I really want to do right now. Server is used 24x7 by severa

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Gustav Schaffter
memory, reporting different errors that it finds... Sorry, I > can't remember the name or find my copy of it (some help I am, huh?) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Charles Galpin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:32 AM &

RE: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
it (some help I am, huh?) > -Original Message- > From: Charles Galpin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:32 AM > To: RedHat List > Subject: Re: Unable to load interpreter > > Duncan > > I have been getting similar messages on a machine t

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-09-13 Thread Charles Galpin
Duncan I have been getting similar messages on a machine that has been acting up lately (and getting worse). It too has plenty of RAM and swap. I'm starting to think a memory chip has gone bad, but it's not the kind of thing you can test easily on an operational server. I would be proactive abo

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-02-08 Thread mi na
Thanks! >From: "Russell W. Behne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: mi na <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Unable to load interpreter >Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 21:56:49 -0500 (EST) > >On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, mi

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-02-08 Thread mi na
Thanks! >From: Steve Borho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Unable to load interpreter >Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 20:52:24 -0600 > >On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 06:36:39PM -0800, mi na wrote: > > Hi All, > > &g

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-02-08 Thread Steve Borho
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 06:36:39PM -0800, mi na wrote: > Hi All, > > I am running a liunx (redhat 5.2) box, and i got the following error from > the console window: > > "unable to load interpreter" > > If i push any key, then it pop up another message "INIT: Id "1" respawning > too fast: disa

Re: Unable to load interpreter

2000-02-08 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, mi na wrote: > Hi All, > > I am running a liunx (redhat 5.2) box, and i got the following error from > the console window: > > "unable to load interpreter" > > If i push any key, then it pop up another message "INIT: Id "1" respawning > too fast: disabled for 5 minutes"