On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Charles Galpin wrote: > Duncan > > I have been getting similar messages on a machine that has been acting up > lately (and getting worse). It too has plenty of RAM and swap. I'm > starting to think a memory chip has gone bad, but it's not the kind of > thing you can test easily on an operational server. > > I would be proactive about this if I were you. I wasn't and it's causing > me a lot lof headaches right now :) > Yeah. It's not indicative of low memory, as the swap is hardly being used. If it were low memory, the swap would be used quite a bit! John _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Unable to load interpreter Red Hat Linux User
- talk at RH 50 Igor N. Green
- Unable to load interpreter mi na
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Steve Borho
- Re: Unable to load interpreter mi na
- Re: Unable to load interpreter mi na
- Unable to load interpreter Duncan Hill
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Charles Galpin
- Re: Unable to load interpreter John Aldrich
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Bret Hughes
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Charles Galpin
- Re: Unable to load interpreter John Aldrich
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Duncan Hill
- RE: Unable to load interpreter Burke, Thomas G.
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Gustav Schaffter
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Duncan Hill
- Re: Unable to load interpreter Charles Galpin
- RE: Unable to load interpreter Burke, Thomas G.
- unable to load interpreter Spyros Ioakim