At 11:06 10/16/2003, you wrote:
My system is Red Hat Linux 9.
At the moment it's just a test box while I get used to the OS. I have
been tasked with setting up a webserver with mail support. I have been
using LAMP for a while so I am quite happy with that, but SendMail is
still a mystery.
Donald,
At 08:08 10/17/2003, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Rodolfo needs to change the attrition like. Ed Croft is trying to steal
my beer!
Sorry, Eudora does not have a way
At 06:08 10/17/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
> Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
>
Um, my name's Ed too, my advice, don't bet on Grey Lady in the fifth.
Now where's my beer?
Virtual beer. Cheers!
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 13:02 10/16/2003, you wrote:
It seems only qmail has been mentioned as an alternative to sendmail...why
not exim?
Postfix has been mentioned as well. I have not discussed Exim simply
because I have no knowledge of it. In the same vein, Courier
(www.courier-mta.org) is another option, that off
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Rodolfo needs to change the attrition like. Ed Croft is trying to steal
my beer!
> > Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
> >The only problem with giving Red Hat $60 now for RHN is that Red Hat
> >Linux 9 is only supported through the end of April. You might be better
> >off buying Red Hat Professional Workstation for $82 (buy.com)
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:36, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> >
> > But friends will let friends use the number 5 "Most Critical Internet
> > Security Threat" (http://www.sans.org/top20/top10.php)?
> >
> Wow, do you believe in statistics?
> I think sendmail is on rank 6 at the moment, since it is used th
I must say I find this sadistic.
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
"friends don't force friends to patch and recompile just to prove they
have hair on their chest"
But friends will let friends use the number 5 "Most Cri
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
"friends don't force friends to patch and recompile just to prove they
have hair on their chest"
But friends will let friends use the number 5 "Most Critical Internet
Security Threat" (h
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 10:53 10/16/2003, you wrote:
> >Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
> >warned him of the qmail mailing list.
>
> I disagreed vehemently with the suggestion. I am very competent as a user
> and a fair shake as a sy
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 12:39, Donald Tyler wrote:
> And now I see perfectly the fanaticism behind each MTA.
>
> Thank you for all your suggestions, try to play nice OK?
>
>
No kidding.
See what happens when you have to run a mail server? Are you sure you
want to get one going?
Bret
--
redha
At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
The only problem with giving Red Hat $60 now for RHN is that Red Hat
Linux 9 is only supported through the end of April. You might be better
off buying Red Hat Professional Workstation for $82 (buy.com) which
includes a year of RHN. More bang for the buck in my opi
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Nothing on Earth (certainly no software product) can ever be counted on to
> be 100% secure. Take Ed's advice, and make sure that all your software is
> adequately kept patched and up-to-date. In this case, although there are
> w
It seems only qmail has been mentioned as an alternative to
sendmail...why not exim?
Although (ahem) I have no personal experience with Exim, several
engineer-friends who worked at extremely large installations (hundreds
of dns servers, internal routers, etc.) all mentioned Exim as what I
shou
At 11:18 10/16/2003, you wrote:
The general argument I've heard and happen to agree with is that if you
are already a sendmail expert or have access to one, continue with
sendmail. However, if you're just starting out, go with Postfix.
I've heard this argument many times but cannot yet provide an
And now I see perfectly the fanaticism behind each MTA.
Thank you for all your suggestions, try to play nice OK?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 10:53 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
I disagreed vehemently with the suggestion. I am very competent as a
user and a fair shake as a sysadmin... and qmail, qmail-users,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:06:24PM -0500, Donald Tyler wrote:
> My system is Red Hat Linux 9.
>
> I am willing to try anything. The most important this is security, and
> then speed/ease of configuration. I need to get this server up and build
> our clients website before the end of the month. Fun
You could put linuxconf on and get sendmail
(including users) going within minutes. linuxconf includes a GUI, TUI, and
web interface.
If you decided to go the linuxconf route, you'll
want to install:
http://vimap.sourceforge.net/ first.
-eric wood
- Original Message -
From:
At 10:53 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
I disagreed vehemently with the suggestion. I am very competent as a user
and a fair shake as a sysadmin... and qmail, qmail-users, and several
individual qm
sage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SendMail GUI
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
>Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
>altern
Donald Tyler wrote:
Thanks for the tip,
Does it come with a GUI? Or can I get one from somewhere?
It doesn't come with one, but Webmin is good for it.
http://www.webmin.com/
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I would suggest qmail.
http://www.qmail.org
I would argue that friends don't let friends get bullied and beaten on
the qmail list and tha
Thanks for the tip,
Does it come with a GUI? Or can I get one from somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Nichel
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SendMail GUI
Donald Tyler wrote:
>
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I would suggest qmail.
http://www.qmail.org
I would argue that friends don't let friends get bullied and beaten on the
qmail list and that friends don't force frie
Donald Tyler wrote:
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know almost nothing of Sendmail I really need a GUI to do that.
Can anyone recommend something?
If not, can someone point me in the direction of a quick start guide? I
have a book that I am readi
The closest you'll get I think is webmin.
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since I
know almost not
Webmin is your friend. http://www.webmin.com
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know almost
Karthikeyan Sankaran wrote:
Hi,
I am Karthik from India. I have a problem which i am seeing in most sendmail/fetchmail servers. May be someone faced this problem(Mail looping problem )before. Problem is, say i have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as pop3 ids and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my l
- Original Message -
From: "David Barkman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:08 PM
Subject: Sendmail or Postfix
> Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
> opinions on mail servers.
> I'm sure Sendmail will have
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:08:17PM -0700, David Barkman wrote:
> Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
> opinions on mail servers. I'm sure Sendmail will have all the
> features I could ever dream of needing, but it's complexity is a bit
> frightening. I have the bo
Hi Helgi,
--- Helgi Örn Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On
2003-09-27, Michael Mansour wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
> > modify the standard delivery of mail from:
> >
> > /var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
> >
> > to the
> >
> > /home/mail
> >
> >
>
On 2003-09-27, Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
> modify the standard delivery of mail from:
>
> /var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
>
> to the
>
> /home/mail
>
>
> directory. I want to do this as it will help in quota
> setup.
>
> I've thought of the
> Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
>
> Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
Um...sort of.
Look in /etc/postfix/aliases. There is a line that by default reads
root:postfix
The comment specifically states that you hav
In my opinion mutt command works better for sending
mail with attatchment using shell script then
sendmail. I tried to send attatchment using sendmail
didn't work for me!
mutt -s "test" -a /root/.bashrc [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
/root/greetings
--- Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2
Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Peter Skensved wrote:
> I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
> something which looks like a permis
On 20:18 17 Sep 2003, David Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
| > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
| > > I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
| > > cannot remember how to do it.
| >
| > If its plain text then jus
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:18:08PM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
> >
> > > I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
> > > cannot remember how to do it.
> > >
> >
> > If its plain te
That may not work as you expect if file "filename" is something other
than text. You may want to consider something like:
uuencode filename filename | mail -s "File from script" emailaddr
The file will have to be uudecoded at the receiving end but it should
make it intact.
I believe uuencode/de
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
>
> > I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
> > cannot remember how to do it.
> >
>
> If its plain text then just
>
> cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I new there w
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
> I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
> cannot remember how to do it.
>
If its plain text then just
cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
else you want to look at uuencoding it then cat'ing it
Rus
--
w: http://www.jv
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:05, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
> Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
This has already been filed in Bugzilla as Bug 104563.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104563
The associated RHSA is RHSA-
> Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
They already have. It's called "postfix". :)
Ben
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sendmail blocking
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
>
>
> On
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White wrote:
>> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
>> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
>> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm already doing the same as that.. but thats for -incoming- mail..
I'm talking about -outgoing- mail..
say for example you wanted a setup where all outgoing mail from a
company was "auto-cc"'d to someone else who monitored that all outgoing
mail from that company was company related..
hope that
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White
wrote:
> > I have a quick sendmail question. A server s
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White wrote:
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets f
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
> Hi redhat-list,
>
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box.
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
> Hi redhat-list,
>
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
> [EMAIL PROT
Forgive me if I misunderstood your goal, but I believe that in your
example you want everything person (b) receives to also go to person
(c). Is this correct?
If so, this is how I accomplish that:
1. Set up a virtmap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] personb-cc
2. Set up an alias: personb-cc: personb, personc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kelerion
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sendmail - splitting outgoing mail to 2
recipients
>
>
> I just re-read what I wrote.. lets try again :)
>
> eg
On Monday 08 September 2003 14:06, Joe Polk wrote:
> Does anyone know if in 7.3 if sendmail is compiled in the rpm with
> libmilter support? I'm trying to get spamass-milter working and I
> have it all setup (so I think) but nothing is filtering.
>
> <>
Mine wasn't ...
12:29:31 # sendmail -b
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 01:00, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 00:22 9/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >Shorewall is setup to only allow ports 53, 80, 25, 123, 443
>
> FYI, on the Shorewall site, in the "contrib" directory, there is a very
> simply Mini-HOWTO I wrote on using Portsentry in combination with
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 05:17, Steve Phillips wrote:
> At 00:00 8/09/2003 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> [snippage]
> >Maybe you can do it if reverse-round-robin-DNS exists, but so far as I
> >know it doesn't and, in any case, you would get any name at random from
> >that list for every request an
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 06:19, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > The first question I have is how can I get sendmail to use the name
> > mail1 instead of webserver1.
> >
> > I was able to fix (workaround ) an error reported by dnsreport.com
> > where it said that the hos
Bret Hughes wrote:
[snip]
> The first question I have is how can I get sendmail to use the name
> mail1 instead of webserver1.
>
> I was able to fix (workaround ) an error reported by dnsreport.com
> where it said that the host name in the greeting was not the same as
> that reported in dns (
At 00:00 8/09/2003 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
[snippage]
Maybe you can do it if reverse-round-robin-DNS exists, but so far as I
know it doesn't and, in any case, you would get any name at random from
that list for every request anyway, which is not what you want. Simply set
the reverse DNS to
At 00:22 9/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Shorewall is setup to only allow ports 53, 80, 25, 123, 443
FYI, on the Shorewall site, in the "contrib" directory, there is a very
simply Mini-HOWTO I wrote on using Portsentry in combination with Shorewall
to dynamic, real-time blocking of Bad People [tm] who
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:35:06PM -0700, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Secondly..I saw some postings on google talking about never ever opening
> up port 25 and just using port 110 (pop3). I want to setup a web server
> and sendmail on it. I Need port 25, correct? If I want to email anyone
> that is ;)
Thank youI completely agree as well.
Jeff
--
Above all, my brothers, do not swear--not by heaven or by earth or by
anything else. Let your "Yes" be yes, and your "No," no, or you will be
condemned.
- James 5:12 (NIV)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:41, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Yes, please give me the resources to look at or purchase.
> Im very concerned over security issues as security, especially
> these days, is such a concern on the internet.
These are all free resources found on the Linux Documentation Project
homepag
Yes, please give me the resources to look at or purchase.
Im very concerned over security issues as security, especially
these days, is such a concern on the internet.
Ive been a software engineer for years, and have done some sysadmin
stuff on and off. I have the book, Linux 7 unleashed (older n
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 01:35, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Hello-
>
> Im new to setting up sendmail (relatively). I tried it on my
> Solaris box so Im a *little* familiar with it all.
[snip]
Res gave you some very good tips and instructions, but I'd like to
suggest one small (but very important) piece of
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> My question is, is it better to use the Redhat RPM's for sendmail
> and just setup the config's or is it better to download the sendmail
> suite from www.sendmail.org and go from there?
Stick with Red Hat's rpm, if you've never compiled and setup sendmail
b
Thanks for the reply, I found the problem though.
system-calls.com -> 12.224.173.233
mail.system-calls.com -> 12.224.173.223
system-calls.com and mail.system-calls.com are the same computer. There
was an error entering the IP address for mail.system-calls.com, one
digit off. Boy, I cant believe
Can you copy/paste the bounce back message? It should be very useful in
trouble shooting your problem.
James Williams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jesse Millan
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
It looks like the server choked on the rest of my message. It just
showed that the mail was accepted:
250 2.0.0 h832egkv004264 Message accepted for delivery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (h832egkv004264 Message accepted for
delivery)
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:45, Jesse Millan wrote:
> I am trying to c
ebmin and save
yourself a lot of time.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Winanjaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:40:22 +0700
Subject: Re: Sendmail, Security
> I think you have to check your mail/access file for
I think you have to check your mail/access file for deny RELAY
Good luck
Winan
- Original Message -
From: "Redhat Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Sendmail, Security
> Dear All,
>
> I am using MTA " sendmail 8.12.6"
On Sunday 31 August 2003 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am hoping that someone may have developed a sendmail rule for the
> following case:
>
> i use ximian and have several e-mail addresses/indentities. when i
> send mail to certain addresses, the destination mail server refuses
>
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 21:00, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> After reading this entire thread, my reply is probably to late. But...
>
> type: sendmail -bt -d0.1
I'm going to give this a shot tomorrow morning as I'm re-cabling the
network; can't hurt, and appreciate the info...ta mate!
--
Fri Aug 29 21
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:35, Didier Casse wrote:
>
>> If you fixed /etc/hosts, and /etc/resolv.conf then I've no clue! It's
>> because of problems like this configuration headaches with sendmail
>> that I decided to switch to qmail! When a friend told me to switch
>> to qmail
I had tye same problem on RH8. I solved that by modifying the hostname to a
fully qualified one.
Example: hostname linus2 -> sendmail slow
hostname linus2.quest.uk -> sendmail fast
try to modify your hostname, it worked for me
Felix
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:35, Didier Casse wrote:
> If you fixed /etc/hosts, and /etc/resolv.conf then I've no clue! It's
> because of problems like this configuration headaches with sendmail that I
> decided to switch to qmail! When a friend told me to switch to qmail, I
> was very hesitant about
On 29 Aug 2003, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:56, Didier Casse wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
> > resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
> > resolve your hostname, it will wait (
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:56, Didier Casse wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
> resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
> resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if you like) until the dns query
> times o
Hi Stephen,
I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if you like) until the dns query
times out. If you look at /var/log/messages you *should* see send
Hi Stephen,
I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if you like) until the dns query
times out. If you look at /var/log/messages you *should* see send
Found the solution from Simon
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2002-January/016541.html
To fix this you will need to tinker with
/usr/share/sendmail-cf/cf/redhat.mc and look for:
dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the loopback device 127.0.0.1
dnl and not on any other netw
Gerry Doris wrote:
It looks like you're trying to run more than one sendmail daemon. I've
seen similar errors when people run sendmail as a standalone daemon and
also try and call sendmail indirectly from an application like
MailScanner. I suggest you check all your mail related programs and
ve
> Hey all,
>
> I have these errors showing up in my logwatch report (regarding postfix):
>
>
> SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon MTA: cannot bind: Address
> already in use: 22 Time(s)
> daemon MTA: problem creating SMTP socket: 22 Time(s)
> DSN: Return receipt: 2 Time(s)
> SYSE
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:37:24PM -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to allow sendmail to authenticate against
> another source? E.g Radius, AD, LDAP
Please try some basic Google searches using search strings like:
sendmail authentication radius
sendmail authenticati
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Eric Chevalier wrote:
> Gerry Doris wrote:
>
> >That's exactly what I get when my daughter tries to send a message to
> >hotmail from my server with a hotmail return address. They accept the
> >message and then dump it.
> >
>
> Could this be spam-filtering on the part of Hot
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Mark Haney wrote:
> Gerry Doris wrote:
> > I believe the only way around this is to have your mail server
> > authenticate with the hotmail server. You might be able to use
> > sendmail's access database for this. I do this for some server I
> > send to.
> >
> > Gerry
>
Gerry Doris wrote:
That's exactly what I get when my daughter tries to send a message to
hotmail from my server with a hotmail return address. They accept the
message and then dump it.
Could this be spam-filtering on the part of Hotmail? It's not uncommon
for spam factories to use bogus or forge
Gerry Doris wrote:
> I believe the only way around this is to have your mail server
> authenticate with the hotmail server. You might be able to use
> sendmail's access database for this. I do this for some server I
> send to.
>
> Gerry
Can you show/tell me how to get started on that? Web p
> Cowles, Steve wrote:
>> What does /var/log/maillog show for delivery to your hotmail accout?
>> Is your mail being delivered and then filtered at hotmail -or- is
>> hotmail rejecting the connection attempt from your MTA?
>
> Aug 1 12:13:42 pcweb sendmail[5495]: h71GDbkX005491:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTE
Mark Haney wrote:
> Cowles, Steve wrote:
>> What does /var/log/maillog show for delivery to your hotmail accout?
>> Is your mail being delivered and then filtered at hotmail -or- is
>> hotmail rejecting the connection attempt from your MTA?
>
> Aug 1 12:13:42 pcweb sendmail[5495]: h71GDbkX005491:
Cowles, Steve wrote:
> What does /var/log/maillog show for delivery to your hotmail accout?
> Is your mail being delivered and then filtered at hotmail -or- is
> hotmail rejecting the connection attempt from your MTA?
Aug 1 12:13:42 pcweb sendmail[5495]: h71GDbkX005491:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark Haney wrote:
> I just tested my hotmail account, and I can reply to the confirm
> message by email to confirm the membership. But it does not send me
> a copy of my list message to the hotmail account. I do however get
> the message sent to my home account just fine. That must be the spam
>
Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:16, Mark Haney wrote:
>
>> I really don't get it. It's beyond bizarre, but then I'm having one
>> of those weeks. Okay, here's the situation. Jason, you are right, I
>> think. I checked the /etc/aliases file and it looked fine. I re-ran
>> /usr/bi
> Jason Dixon wrote:
>> On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:44, Mark Haney wrote:
> snip
> I really don't get it. It's beyond bizarre, but then I'm having one of
> those weeks. Okay, here's the situation. Jason, you are right, I
> think. I checked the /etc/aliases file and it looked fine. I re-ran
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:16, Mark Haney wrote:
> I really don't get it. It's beyond bizarre, but then I'm having one of
> those weeks. Okay, here's the situation. Jason, you are right, I
> think. I checked the /etc/aliases file and it looked fine. I re-ran
> /usr/bin/newaliases just in case a
Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:44, Mark Haney wrote:
>>> 3) When you telnet to your system, where are you telnetting from? By
>>> default, the redhat supplied access file should allow relaying from
>>> e-mail sumitted locally. i.e. localhost.
>>>
>> Jason and Steve, I think you are
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:44, Mark Haney wrote:
> > 3) When you telnet to your system, where are you telnetting from? By
> > default, the redhat supplied access file should allow relaying from
> > e-mail sumitted locally. i.e. localhost.
> >
> Jason and Steve, I think you are right on allowing re
> 3) When you telnet to your system, where are you telnetting from? By
> default, the redhat supplied access file should allow relaying from
> e-mail sumitted locally. i.e. localhost.
>
Jason and Steve, I think you are right on allowing relaying through
localhost. I bet that's exactly why I can
Mark Haney wrote:
> It may seem like this is the wrong place to post, but I think the
> issue is with sendmail. I'm trying to setup Mailman for a small
> mailing list for our county school system. Mailman itself seems to
> work, I can subscribe from the web page, and I get an email
> confirming t
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:03, Mark Haney wrote:
> It may seem like this is the wrong place to post, but I think the issue
> is with sendmail. I'm trying to setup Mailman for a small mailing list
> for our county school system. Mailman itself seems to work, I can
> subscribe from the web page, and
itics/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cowles, Steve
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 6:48 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Sendmail not able to send to external addresses.
>
>
> [EMAIL PRO
1 - 100 of 1211 matches
Mail list logo
