On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:21, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> > > rpm -Uvh --force glibc-2.2.5-39.i686.rpm kernel-2.4.18-10.i686.rpm
> >
> > Should do the job.
>
> Thats assuming that the box doesn't get hosed during the upgrade :\
That's true of any glibc rpm upgrade, regardless of whether the upgr
At 00:21 30.10.2002, Jonathan M. Slivko said:
[snip]
>> > rpm -Uvh --force glibc-2.2.5-39.i686.rpm kernel-2.4.18-10.i686.rpm
>>
>> Should do the job.
>
>Thats assuming that the box doesn't get hosed during the upgrade :\
[snip]--
> > rpm -Uvh --force glibc-2.2.5-39.i686.rpm kernel-2.4.18-10.i686.rpm
>
> Should do the job.
Thats assuming that the box doesn't get hosed during the upgrade :\
-- Jonathan
--
Jonathan M. Slivko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX/IT Consultant phone: 212-663-1109
PGP Key: None A
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Samuel Flory wrote:
> Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> >While attempting to install anything .i686 ontop of anything .i386, rpm
> >screams bloody murder about conflicting files. Can I safely remove the .i386
> >version and install the .i686 one? My most recent attempt have
At 23:38 29.10.2002, Bret Hughes said:
[snip]
>> Nearly verything depends on glibc. Most of the rpm have dep by file.
>> Example:
>> [root@sflory fdisk]# rpm -q --whatrequires /sbin/ldconfig |wc -l
>> 209
>> [root@sflory fdisk]# rpm -qf /sbin/ldconf
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 16:06, Samuel Flory wrote:
>
> Nearly verything depends on glibc. Most of the rpm have dep by file.
> Example:
> [root@sflory fdisk]# rpm -q --whatrequires /sbin/ldconfig |wc -l
> 209
> [root@sflory fdisk]# rpm -qf /sbin/ldconfig
> glibc-2.2.93-5
> [root@sflory fdi
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
While attempting to install anything .i686 ontop of anything .i386, rpm
screams bloody murder about conflicting files. Can I safely remove the .i386
version and install the .i686 one? My most recent attempt have been of
glibc-2.2.5-39.i686.rpm and kernel-2.4.18-10.i
Bret Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:02, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
on my box (RH 7.2 SMP), rpm -q --whatrequires glibc returns:
On my stripped down 7.3 I get:
# rpm -q --whatrequires glibc
anonftp-4.0-9
glibc-devel-2.2.5-39
You know on
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:02, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
>
> > on my box (RH 7.2 SMP), rpm -q --whatrequires glibc returns:
>
> On my stripped down 7.3 I get:
>
> # rpm -q --whatrequires glibc
> anonftp-4.0-9
> glibc-devel-2.2.5-39
>
You know on my not so stripp
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
> on my box (RH 7.2 SMP), rpm -q --whatrequires glibc returns:
On my stripped down 7.3 I get:
# rpm -q --whatrequires glibc
anonftp-4.0-9
glibc-devel-2.2.5-39
> There doesn't seem to be a kernel-live-module that requires glibc.
>
> That also makes sense, IMHO. A
It doesn't work on 6.2, maybe they changed it in 7.2. *shrug*
-- Jonathan
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:35, Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
> At 21:23 29.10.2002, Jonathan M. Slivko said:
> [snip]
> >Ashley,
> >
> >If you remove your glibc rpm, then the box is as goo
At 21:23 29.10.2002, Jonathan M. Slivko said:
[snip]
>Ashley,
>
>If you remove your glibc rpm, then the box is as good as hosed. Don't
>even try it.
[snip]
Hmm...
on my box (RH 7.2 SMP), rpm -q --whatrequires glibc r
Ashley,
If you remove your glibc rpm, then the box is as good as hosed. Don't
even try it.
-- Jonathan
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:07, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> While attempting to install anything .i686 ontop of anything .i386, rpm
> screams bloody murder about conflicting files. Can I sa
13 matches
Mail list logo
