Try "uname -a" from command line.
-Sameer
- Original Message -
From: "Redhat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: kernel version from command line?
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 02:35:19PM -0700, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
Just to be different...
cat /proc/version
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
--
re
to get just what you need... 'uname -r'
On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 17:35 America/New_York, Redhat wrote:
Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
the command line?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redha
Type uname -r at the terminal.
That will give you the kernel version.
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:35, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
--
Vince Parsons, Independent Contractor/Consultant
RHCE 807001402402771
704.839.9473
--
redhat
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
>
>
Run "uname -a"
Rgds
Rus Foster
--
w: http://www.jvds.com | Linux + FreeBSD VDS's from $15/mo
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Totally Customizable Technology
t: 07919 373537
try uname -a
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:35, Redhat wrote:
> Also, how do I find out what kernel version is running from
> the command line?
--
Aly S.P Dharshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Southern Alberta Digital Library Project
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 20:53, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> Gordon,
>
> *heh* I think you are right - I have been using the 2.4.19 kernel w/
> 7.3 since it was released. I compiled with gcc-2.96 w/ rh73, and I
> don't think that I changed it when I upgraded to 8.0. So sorry, and I
> will try a gc
try uname -a
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Avinash Gowda wrote:
> Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2. I have the
>source RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10. But when I install the rpm's
>they are installed as 2.4.7. The question is which version does
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 22:25, Avinash Gowda wrote:
> Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2. I have the
>source RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10. But when I install the rpm's
>they are installed as 2.4.7. The question is which version does RH7.2 come wit
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:25:52PM -0700, Avinash Gowda wrote:
>
> Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2.
> I have the source RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10.
> But when I install the rpm's they are installed as 2.4.7. The question
> is which version do
AG> Hi: I am trying to find out the exact version the kernel in RH7.2. I
AG> have the source RPMs for the kernel and they say it is 2.4.7-10. But
AG> when I install the rpm's they are installed as 2.4.7. The question is
AG> which version does RH7.2 come with. Is it 2.4.7-10 or 2.4
>
> kernel-2.4.9-34 IS the latest kernel released for Red Hat 7.2
But the latest stable is 2.4.18 until now,
Do we expect to be the kernel for 8.0 ?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-
** Reply to message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) on Fri, 08 Feb 2002
12:48:55 -0500
> Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The 2.5.x series are TEST kernels for the new 2.6.x series coming late
> > this year, or early next year. Unless you are in the kernel de
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:29:54PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > My current kernel version is 2.4.9-6
Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Admittedly, I comfortably follow your advice, Trond, and use the Red Hat
> released kernels, and promote the same usage pattern for those I consult
> with.
>
> However, I also admit my discomfort in vendor-specific kernels. My techie
> desires are
Admittedly, I comfortably follow your advice, Trond, and use the Red Hat
released kernels, and promote the same usage pattern for those I consult
with.
However, I also admit my discomfort in vendor-specific kernels. My techie
desires are to use the latest (what is it now, 2.4.18?) stock kernels
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> My current kernel version is 2.4.9-6. The latest version in the
> redhat update agent is 2.4.9-19. the latest vesion in the www.kernel.org
> is 2.5.3. If I use 2.5.3, will it cause some problems?
2.5.3 is bleeding edge - if you have
>From what I remember, even numbers are released as generally stable kernels
(ie 2.4), odd numbers are development (ie 2.5). At least that's what I
remember, I could be wrong.
Shaun Carter
-Original Message-
From: Jianping Zhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1
Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 2.5.x series are TEST kernels for the new 2.6.x series coming late
> this year, or early next year. Unless you are in the kernel developer's
> type guild, you shouldn't mess with the 2.5.x kernels. Stay with the
> latest in the 2.4.x series.
The 2.5.x series are TEST kernels for the new 2.6.x series coming late
this year, or early next year. Unless you are in the kernel developer's
type guild, you shouldn't mess with the 2.5.x kernels. Stay with the
latest in the 2.4.x series.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> My current
A revision/release point. Sort of a subrelease.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Tally Jones wrote:
> The kernel version like 2.0.34 (came from redhat 5.1)
>
> kernel version (2.2.14-5.0) that comes with redhat
> 6.2, what is 5.0 here ?
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Charles Galpin spewed into the bitstream:
CG>Can anyone tell me the difference (or point me to a writeup) between the
CG>kernels with the acX extension, and those without?
CG>
CG>I'm assuming it stands for Alan Cox, but why are there two, and what is
CG>the difference, and wh
The changelog has these additional entries:
* Mon Jun 19 2000 Michael K. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- added davem's sparc syncdma patch
- fixed /usr/include/* symlinks with triggerun
- added bcrl's raw-fixup2 patch
* Sun Jun 18 2000 Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- workaround to build on spar
23 matches
Mail list logo
