RE: UDMA and Linux

2001-01-05 Thread John MacLean
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Peltonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 6:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: UDMA and Linux > > What does "ATA 100M/s" then mean? Something else that hdparm > -tT measures? >

RE: UDMA and Linux

2001-01-05 Thread Jason Holland
> I grabbed the ide-patch for 2.2.17, applied it and did make > menuconfig. There > are few new things that I see in "Block Devices" but nothing > that would > mention anything about ATA100 or ATA66. Am I missing something here? > > As the 2.4 is now out, what new does it bring to us on the > IDE-

Re: UDMA and Linux

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Peltonen
Jason Holland wrote: > > that does look a bit slow performance wise. I'm not 100% certain, but I > don't think 2.2.17 is patched to take advantage of ata100. maybe try the > ata100 patch from http://www.linux-ide.org. I grabbed the ide-patch for 2.2.17, applied it and did make menuconfig. Ther

Re: UDMA and Linux

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Peltonen
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Slow? I don't now when you first used a computer, but from my perspective > this is incredibly fast. I have got machines with 2 years old hard disks that Well... My first PC was an 8086 with 512k RAM and a single floppy. I had so much RAM that I even made a R

Re: UDMA and Linux

2001-01-04 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi again Peter, > /dev/hda: > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.07 seconds =119.63 MB/sec > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.39 seconds = 26.78 MB/sec > > > 26,8 M/s sounds a bit slow to me... Is it? Slow? I don't now when you first used a computer, but f

RE: UDMA and Linux

2001-01-04 Thread Jason Holland
that does look a bit slow performance wise. I'm not 100% certain, but I don't think 2.2.17 is patched to take advantage of ata100. maybe try the ata100 patch from http://www.linux-ide.org. Jason > > I have Intel's D815EEA mother board and IBM's Ultra ATA 100 hard disk. > > I've given the follo