RE: Printer interface

2002-04-04 Thread Kevin Krieser
tached. I only recently got an used printer server box, so I moved the printer there). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael George Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Printer interface I have a printe

Re: Printer interface

2002-04-04 Thread Ed Wilts
From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Can't say for your printer, but according to the tests I've read, my HP > 1200 > > LaserJet is something like 20% slower when driven through USB port than > when > > driven through the parallel port. Don't know why; may be an aberration. > > That's

Re: Printer interface

2002-04-03 Thread Edward Dekkers
> Can't say for your printer, but according to the tests I've read, my HP 1200 > LaserJet is something like 20% slower when driven through USB port than when > driven through the parallel port. Don't know why; may be an aberration. That's interesting. I haven't tried USB on Linux yet, but all my

Re: Printer interface

2002-04-03 Thread Cokey de Percin
Michael George wrote: > > I have a printer (Brother 1250) which has both a parallel and USB interface on > the back of it. I currently have it connected to my RHL 7.2 box through the > parallel part, but I'm wondering if there would be any advantage to connecting > through the USB connector. I'

Printer interface

2002-04-03 Thread Michael George
I have a printer (Brother 1250) which has both a parallel and USB interface on the back of it. I currently have it connected to my RHL 7.2 box through the parallel part, but I'm wondering if there would be any advantage to connecting through the USB connector. I'm guessing not but I thought I'd