tached. I only recently
got an used printer server box, so I moved the printer there).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael George
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Printer interface
I have a printe
From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Can't say for your printer, but according to the tests I've read, my HP
> 1200
> > LaserJet is something like 20% slower when driven through USB port than
> when
> > driven through the parallel port. Don't know why; may be an aberration.
>
> That's
> Can't say for your printer, but according to the tests I've read, my HP
1200
> LaserJet is something like 20% slower when driven through USB port than
when
> driven through the parallel port. Don't know why; may be an aberration.
That's interesting. I haven't tried USB on Linux yet, but all my
Michael George wrote:
>
> I have a printer (Brother 1250) which has both a parallel and USB interface on
> the back of it. I currently have it connected to my RHL 7.2 box through the
> parallel part, but I'm wondering if there would be any advantage to connecting
> through the USB connector. I'
I have a printer (Brother 1250) which has both a parallel and USB interface on
the back of it. I currently have it connected to my RHL 7.2 box through the
parallel part, but I'm wondering if there would be any advantage to connecting
through the USB connector. I'm guessing not but I thought I'd