Re: Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-07-03 Thread Steve Manuel
Tom Watts wrote: > > Steve Manuel wrote: > > > > > > > Does your patch include the Framebuffer stuff? I have yet to find a > > patch to let me > > enable the framebuffer/Acceleration options for my Matrox G200. This is > > true whether I get the stock kernel source or the Redhat RPM's. It seems

Re: Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-07-03 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 01:50:38AM -0500, Steve Manuel wrote: : Does your patch include the Framebuffer stuff? I have yet to find a : patch to let me : enable the framebuffer/Acceleration options for my Matrox G200. This is : true whether I get the stock kernel source or the Redhat RPM's. It seem

Re: Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-07-03 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:44:25AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: : Lots of people complain about that, but most all of Red Hat's extras are : modules. I've never seen any real benchmarks to indicate that there is : any performance difference between a packaged kernel and one that has : unneeded mo

Re: Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-07-03 Thread Tom Watts
Steve Manuel wrote: > > > Does your patch include the Framebuffer stuff? I have yet to find a > patch to let me > enable the framebuffer/Acceleration options for my Matrox G200. This is > true whether I get the stock kernel source or the Redhat RPM's. It seems > to be in the source tree but not

Re: Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-07-03 Thread Steve Manuel
Jason Costomiris wrote: > > I'm not big on using the stock RedHat kernels.. I prefer to use kernels > tuned to my hardware, without the extras that RedHat builds in... > > On my home PC, I need to use the CD/DVD patches, the new IDE patches, > ReiserFS, and I wanted USB support, so the USB back

Re: Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-06-30 Thread Gordon Messmer
Jason Costomiris wrote: > I'm not big on using the stock RedHat kernels.. I prefer to use kernels > tuned to my hardware, without the extras that RedHat builds in... Lots of people complain about that, but most all of Red Hat's extras are modules. I've never seen any real benchmarks to indicate

Monster Kernel 2.2.16 patch.

2000-06-30 Thread Jason Costomiris
I'm not big on using the stock RedHat kernels.. I prefer to use kernels tuned to my hardware, without the extras that RedHat builds in... On my home PC, I need to use the CD/DVD patches, the new IDE patches, ReiserFS, and I wanted USB support, so the USB backport patch. That's where this whole