Re: Figuring out memory usage question...

2003-08-28 Thread Yanick Poirier
ess. So even tough I killed all my user processes, the memory usage was still loaded. The reason why the process remains in memory is because it speed up the processing when a process is often loaded and unload. The load times after the first load are faster since the whole application code is alre

Re: Figuring out memory usage question...

2003-08-28 Thread Jason Williams
Im wondering if this a memory leak of some sort...its weird...havent seen this before Any suggestions are greatly appreciated... Jason At 12:15 PM 8/28/2003 -0700, you wrote: Hello everyone... Im running a RH 7.3 server. It is running Samba 2.2.8a with OpenLDAP 2.0.27 on the backend for a

Figuring out memory usage question...

2003-08-28 Thread Jason Williams
Hello everyone... Im running a RH 7.3 server. It is running Samba 2.2.8a with OpenLDAP 2.0.27 on the backend for accounts. Everything is working so far with this server, however I noticed something today that im not to sure about.. The server specs: Xeon 2.8ghz 2gig RAM 3 36 320 SCSI drives Wha

openoffice memory usage

2003-07-07 Thread Tom Hosiawa
When I right click on a word not in the dictionary in oowrite, memory usage for soffice.bin goes from about 48MB to 210MB. I'm wondering if anybody else is having this problem, could this be a bug? Tom -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redha

Re: Memory usage

2003-06-20 Thread Sebastian Jeremias
uses PostgreSQL) and a Samba server. I also have a Novell eDirectory Server for Linux installed, wich I run from time to time. I have only 256MB RAM and my memory usage rarely grows over 90%. David Kramer wrote: I just went through the exact same issue. I used my System Monitor program via my start

Re: Memory usage

2003-06-19 Thread Kelerion
ll see that there is a middle line that say -/+ buffers/cache which gives you the memory usage without the buffers and cache taken into consideration. That middle line is a fairly accurate display of what memory is available for processes on your system. It's kind of nice to see all your memor

RE: Memory usage

2003-06-19 Thread David Kramer
0:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Memory usage > > > Hi guys.. hoping someone can explain something to me here.. > > I have just upgraded my RH9 box to 1Gb DDR.. I thought, rather > presumptuously that this might give me a little more space to > play with > me

RE: Memory usage

2003-06-19 Thread Sites, Brad
more memory or if a new process comes in that needs some memory, Linux automatically pulls things out of cache and frees that memory up for the processes. If you do a 'free' command from the command line, you will see that there is a middle line that say -/+ buffers/cache which gives yo

Memory usage

2003-06-19 Thread Kelerion
Hi guys.. hoping someone can explain something to me here.. I have just upgraded my RH9 box to 1Gb DDR.. I thought, rather presumptuously that this might give me a little more space to play with memory wise.. but after looking through 'top' I get the following:

Memory usage problem

2003-06-08 Thread Tacettin Ayar
Hi, I am using Redhat 9.0 and I have a memory problem. I have a parent process and child processes which are created on demand by forking at the main process. They use a shared memory to share some data. I monitor the memory usage by Redhat 9.0's own "system monitor" tool. It h

Re: Memory usage very high

2003-03-20 Thread nate
> Hi there > > On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) memory usage is increasing up to 440MB > (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than > 50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using > extremely much memory. As well a reb

Re: High memory usage

2003-03-20 Thread Ed . Greshko
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) is memory usage increasing up to 440MB > (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than > 50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using > extremely

RE: Memory usage very high

2003-03-20 Thread Rick Carroll
meg is “used”. But I’m using 500+ megs for buffers and cache.     Rick     -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Memory usage very high   Hi there On our Linux Server (OS RedHat

RE: High memory usage

2003-03-20 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: High memory usage Hi there On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) is memory usage increasing up to 440MB (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than 50MB. We checked all runnin

Re: Memory usage very high

2003-03-20 Thread bollu
Cyr Hi there On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) memory usage is increasing up to 440MB (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than 50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using extremely much memory. As well a reboo

High memory usage

2003-03-20 Thread nadine . furrer
Hi there On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) is memory usage increasing up to 440MB (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than 50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using extremely much memory. As well a reboot has not helped to bring

Memory usage very high

2003-03-20 Thread nadine . furrer
Hi there On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) memory usage is increasing up to 440MB(available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process usingextremely much memory. As well a reboot has not helped to bring

Re: memory usage displayed by top command

2003-01-29 Thread nate
Shaju Peter said: > Hello everybody > I have observed that after exiting for xwindows > to shell prompt tthe memory usage observed by > using top is very high but after running some > executables on shell prompt it was immediatly comming > down > does any valid reason beh

memory usage displayed by top command

2003-01-29 Thread Shaju Peter
Hello everybody I have observed that after exiting for xwindows to shell prompt tthe memory usage observed by using top is very high but after running some executables on shell prompt it was immediatly comming down does any valid reason behind this? Shaju peter

Re: Memory usage / management

2001-02-01 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alex Tabony wrote: > I have a redhat 7 machine with 256mb ram running Samba for file/print > serving and mail services for 30 windows clients. I have been observing the > memory usage on the machine and I am a bit confused. > [ship] > > The weird thing

Re: Memory usage / management - a problem

2001-02-01 Thread Alex Tabony
.100.221) couldn't find service hp2000c: Just made a little discovery. The last thing I did before samba stopped was copying the remaining files from our old server to the Linux server. I just did a quick test. I made a file of about 26 mb on the windows desktop. Then I copied it to the shar

Re: Memory usage / management

2001-02-01 Thread Statux
> The weird thing, is that later on today when no one is on the system, free > will give me almost the exact same numbers. Why are not the buffers and > cache getting flushed (right word?). I've been watching the memory usage > for the last few days and it stays about the same

Re: Memory usage / management

2001-01-31 Thread Jeff Hogg
-Original Message- From: Alex Tabony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: Memory usage / management >I have a redhat 7 machine with 256mb ram running Samba for file/print >serving and ma

Memory usage / management

2001-01-31 Thread Alex Tabony
I have a redhat 7 machine with 256mb ram running Samba for file/print serving and mail services for 30 windows clients. I have been observing the memory usage on the machine and I am a bit confused. Right now there are about 5 users logged in via Samba. Mail is down. Free gives me