Re: Red Hat 7.2 HTML Editor.

2003-05-29 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
I like gedit :) It handles frames just fine. Out of curiosity, what are you needing this for? Specifically, why do you want frames? Jon On Thu, 29 May 2003, Alan Lake wrote: > I've been satisfied with Quanta. The version that I ran when I had a RH 7.2 > box left a lot to be desired, but the

Re: Red Hat 7.2 HTML Editor.

2003-05-29 Thread Alan Lake
I've been satisfied with Quanta. The version that I ran when I had a RH 7.2 box left a lot to be desired, but the one that came with RH9 is much improved. Whether you can run the latest version on your 7.2 box remains to be seen... Best, Alan > On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 18:52, John N. Alegre wrote:

Re: Red Hat 7.2 HTML Editor.

2003-05-29 Thread Jim Hayward
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 18:52, John N. Alegre wrote: > What are peoples top suggestions for free linux HTML page creation software. I > want something that can handle all the latest HTML extensions, style sheets, > dual frames, etc. etc. I want it to be free and I want it to be compatible > with r

Red Hat 7.2 HTML Editor.

2003-05-29 Thread John N. Alegre
Ok List, What are peoples top suggestions for free linux HTML page creation software. I want something that can handle all the latest HTML extensions, style sheets, dual frames, etc. etc. I want it to be free and I want it to be compatible with remote display to another X-Window server. I am ru

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-02 Thread Reuben D Budiardja
On Thursday 02 May 2002 10:24 am, Hardy Merrill wrote: > I've been curious, so I started playing with Composer again - the > Mozilla that comes with Red Hat 7.2, and it still mangles hand-coded > html. There's even a switch in Preferences/Composer for > "Retain original source formatting", so I c

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-02 Thread Hardy Merrill
I've been curious, so I started playing with Composer again - the Mozilla that comes with Red Hat 7.2, and it still mangles hand-coded html. There's even a switch in Preferences/Composer for "Retain original source formatting", so I checked that, and it did save the original formatting for a litt

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-02 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:23:24AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote: > Use mozilla. It has a 'composer' that can generate html page. It's pretty > much customizable, as you can add more attribut to the HTML tag. In my > opinion, it's the best Editor (and browser, of course) out there. Does it g

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread ABrady
On Wed, 1 May 2002 14:28:50 -0400 Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated: > Timothy Lee Young [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than > > adequate for the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's > > sweet. > > Last time I

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Vidiot
>Timothy Lee Young [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: >> I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than adequate for >> the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's sweet. > >Last time I used "Composer" to edit HTML that I had hand-coded, >it mangled my hand-coded html. That was qu

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Hardy Merrill
Timothy Lee Young [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than adequate for > the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's sweet. Last time I used "Composer" to edit HTML that I had hand-coded, it mangled my hand-coded html. That was quite a

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Reuben D Budiardja
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 09:35 am, you wrote: > Hi, > > What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for my > RH 7.2 system? > > TIA, > Bill Use mozilla. It has a 'composer' that can generate html page. It's pretty much customizable,

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 10:16, Caner Baydemir wrote: > > > What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for > > > my RH 7.2 system? > > > > http://linux.tucows.com/internet/html_editors.html > > > > Lists a bunch. > > > >

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Timothy Lee Young
I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than adequate for the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's sweet. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Caner Baydemir
> > What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for > > my RH 7.2 system? > > http://linux.tucows.com/internet/html_editors.html > > Lists a bunch. > > I like Bluefish and CoffeeCup. Blufish is great! But it is code based HTML editor, not

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Michael J. Denton
> What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for my > RH 7.2 system? http://linux.tucows.com/internet/html_editors.html Lists a bunch. I like Bluefish and CoffeeCup. Michael ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread BG
Hi,   What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for my RH 7.2 system?   TIA, Bill

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-12 Thread Janyne Kizer
Amaya isn't a Dreamweaver equivalent but it is a nice little GUI editor (www.w3c.org). "Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz)" wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Redhat mailing list wrote: > > > > > What's is the best HTML editor that i can > > com

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-12 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:53:07AM -0800, Ryan Speed wrote: > Try mozilla, it comes with composer (as seen in netscape communicator). > I personally use vi, but I have noticed that the mozilla developers are > actively working on composer. I'd sincerely hope that Mozilla's Composer produces bette

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-09 Thread Brandon Dorman
rvers/hpbuilder/linux/download_1.html I think you have to register, but... anyway, just a thought. Good luck finding something you like. -Brandon On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 10:41, Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Redhat mailing list wrote: > > > > > What

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-09 Thread Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz)
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Redhat mailing list wrote: > > What's is the best HTML editor that i can > compare with macromedia dreamweaver? > > carlo > There is no equivalent in the Linux world. You can use Bluefish if you want to, but there is no powerful WYSIWYG HTML ed

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-09 Thread Ed Wilts
> What's is the best HTML editor that i can > compare with macromedia dreamweaver? I've never used Dreamweaver, but I use IBM's Homepage Builder - it's commercial but it does have a freely available demo. Easy to use, but it is does require its own copy of Wine which m

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-09 Thread Lewi
maybe bluefish, perhaps it can't be compared with dreamweaver but its better than vim (in my thinking). On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 09:59:50PM -0800, David Talkington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Redhat mailing list wrote: > > >What's

Re: HTML Editor

2002-02-08 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Redhat mailing list wrote: >What's is the best HTML editor that i can >compare with macromedia dreamweaver? emacs! - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.b

HTML Editor

2002-02-08 Thread Redhat mailing list
What's is the best HTML editor that i can compare with macromedia dreamweaver? carlo ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

HTML editor

2000-02-24 Thread Gate
Anyone know of a WYSIWYG HTML editor for Linux that is HTML 4 compliant or at least supports absolute positioning ( commands)? Preferably free of course :) Thanks! Bryan -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.