Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-02 Thread Reuben D Budiardja
On Thursday 02 May 2002 10:24 am, Hardy Merrill wrote: > I've been curious, so I started playing with Composer again - the > Mozilla that comes with Red Hat 7.2, and it still mangles hand-coded > html. There's even a switch in Preferences/Composer for > "Retain original source formatting", so I c

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-02 Thread Hardy Merrill
I've been curious, so I started playing with Composer again - the Mozilla that comes with Red Hat 7.2, and it still mangles hand-coded html. There's even a switch in Preferences/Composer for "Retain original source formatting", so I checked that, and it did save the original formatting for a litt

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-02 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:23:24AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote: > Use mozilla. It has a 'composer' that can generate html page. It's pretty > much customizable, as you can add more attribut to the HTML tag. In my > opinion, it's the best Editor (and browser, of course) out there. Does it g

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread ABrady
On Wed, 1 May 2002 14:28:50 -0400 Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated: > Timothy Lee Young [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than > > adequate for the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's > > sweet. > > Last time I

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Vidiot
>Timothy Lee Young [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: >> I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than adequate for >> the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's sweet. > >Last time I used "Composer" to edit HTML that I had hand-coded, >it mangled my hand-coded html. That was qu

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Hardy Merrill
Timothy Lee Young [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than adequate for > the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's sweet. Last time I used "Composer" to edit HTML that I had hand-coded, it mangled my hand-coded html. That was quite a

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Reuben D Budiardja
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 09:35 am, you wrote: > Hi, > > What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for my > RH 7.2 system? > > TIA, > Bill Use mozilla. It has a 'composer' that can generate html page. It's pretty much customizable,

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 10:16, Caner Baydemir wrote: > > > What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for > > > my RH 7.2 system? > > > > http://linux.tucows.com/internet/html_editors.html > > > > Lists a bunch. > > > >

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Timothy Lee Young
I find the "Composer" applet, within Mozilla, to be more than adequate for the task at hand. Have you installed Mozilla? It's sweet. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Caner Baydemir
> > What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for > > my RH 7.2 system? > > http://linux.tucows.com/internet/html_editors.html > > Lists a bunch. > > I like Bluefish and CoffeeCup. Blufish is great! But it is code based HTML editor, not

Re: Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread Michael J. Denton
> What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for my > RH 7.2 system? http://linux.tucows.com/internet/html_editors.html Lists a bunch. I like Bluefish and CoffeeCup. Michael ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Graphical HTML editor

2002-05-01 Thread BG
Hi,   What is the most versatile and easiest to use graphical HTML editor for my RH 7.2 system?   TIA, Bill