>so I am just a little confused.
>Does RH5 support FAT32? If so do I use vfat?
Yes, but don't forget to include(load) the neccesary code-pages, or it
won't mount.
>Thanks!!
>Matt W.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Igmar
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
ht
> so I am just a little confused.
>
> Does RH5 support FAT32? If so do I use vfat?
The default kernel in RH5 doesn't support FAT32. You need to install a
newer kernel to support that. The default in RH5.1 does support FAT32.
Yes, you do use vfat.
==
so I am just a little confused.
Does RH5 support FAT32? If so do I use vfat?
Thanks!!
Matt W.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe:
> < have to use
> < <
> Ok, so Linux 2.0.34 tolerates Fat32 but won't create such a
> partition... Then I don't understand why Linux Fdisk allows you
> to create a partition a using Fat32 ID..?
Pretty much. Apparently the Linux fdisk doesn't set some additional info
that DOS uses. Note, there a
< Created a linux and dos primary partition just like before but
> used fat32 win95 partition type and I cannot get either win95 nor
> dos fdisk to recognize it... How do are guys initializing that
> drive so win95 installation cd "sees" it ?
>
> (dos fdisk still sees it as non-dos partition whil
> Created a linux and dos primary partition just like before but
> used fat32 win95 partition type and I cannot get either win95 nor
> dos fdisk to recognize it... How do are guys initializing that
> drive so win95 installation cd "sees" it ?
>
> (dos fdisk still sees it as non-dos partition whil
Read earlier that the new 5.1 or 2.034 kernel has fat32 support. I just installed 5.1
after deleting 5.0 and must say, it was far smoother than the 5.0
Created a linux and dos primary partition just like before but used fat32 win95
partition type and I cannot get either win95 nor dos fdisk to
