Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2002-01-03 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Mike W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The Linksys router does not include a NIC card. You can get a > Linksys or D-Link PCI NIC for less than US$15. I have one of each > in my two RH7.2 boxes. The D-Link uses the Tulip driver. I > forget which one the Linksys uses. > > Mike W > The Links

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2002-01-03 Thread Mike W
The Linksys router does not include a NIC card. You can get a Linksys or D-Link PCI NIC for less than US$15. I have one of each in my two RH7.2 boxes. The D-Link uses the Tulip driver. I forget which one the Linksys uses. Mike W Dominic Mitchell wrote: > >Hi, > >OK, I will go with the L

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2002-01-02 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Hi, OK, I will go with the Linksys router. I have checked for the BEFSR41, its cost here in Montreal is around 129$ (Canadian) which corresponds to roughly 80$ US. The description of the unit though does not include an Ethernet card I will have to purchase one that performs well under both

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-30 Thread System Services
You can set the LynkSys to open certain ports and let those ports goto certain machines. Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > I am very interested in the Linksys router, but I have one > question though. Although for most purpose, I do not want to > allow incoming connections from outside, there is one

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-30 Thread Dominic Mitchell
I am very interested in the Linksys router, but I have one question though. Although for most purpose, I do not want to allow incoming connections from outside, there is one exception : the gnutella network. This requires to have at least one port open ( i.e. 6346 ). How using the linksys ro

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-29 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 12:51:03PM -0600, Gary wrote: > Good idea... I just came from the hardware store for a drill bit, and am > putting in another hole next to the cable. .. much easier that way.. Another really, really useful item is a 6' (that's feet) or so flexible drill bit. They're avai

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-29 Thread Gary
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 09:12:39AM -0600 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote: > > I'd strongly suggest getting a printserver; It relieves a lot of > headaches. > I have a combination hub/printserver (NetGear PS104). It's been a piece of > crap and I finally took it out of my n

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-29 Thread Gary
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 08:55:53AM -0600 or thereabouts, Dave Ihnat wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:28:28PM -0600, Gary wrote: > > I just today bought a Linksys 10/100 5-port switch which came *with* an > > ether10/100 PCI card in the box... for $55 This also includes a shared > > uplink port

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-29 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 09:12:39AM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote: > I have a combination hub/printserver (NetGear PS104). It's been a piece of > crap and I finally took it out of my network and it's sitting on a shelf. I'm sorry for your experience. Clearly mine's been just the opposite. > Not only do

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-29 Thread Ed Wilts
> I'd strongly suggest getting a printserver; It relieves a lot of headaches. > -You no longer have to have a server machine running to use the printer > -It doesn't affect the performance of the server machine > -Printservers are as cheap as switches. > -They interact well with bo

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-29 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:28:28PM -0600, Gary wrote: > I just today bought a Linksys 10/100 5-port switch which came *with* an > ether10/100 PCI card in the box... for $55 This also includes a shared > uplink port for other switches/Hubs.. Couldn't pass it up. It is, indeed, a good deal. Ther

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-28 Thread Gary
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:52:31AM -0600 or thereabouts, Dave Ihnat wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:14:23PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote: > > Hub good, cross over cable bad, ugh. > Praytell, why do you say so? A hub doesn't do anything except, maybe, > signal regeneration for long runs, almost

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-28 Thread Keith Morse
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Dave Ihnat wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:14:23PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote: > > Hub good, cross over cable bad, ugh. > > Praytell, why do you say so? A hub doesn't do anything except, maybe, > signal regeneration for long runs, almost certainly not an issue here. > Als

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-28 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:14:23PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote: > Hub good, cross over cable bad, ugh. Praytell, why do you say so? A hub doesn't do anything except, maybe, signal regeneration for long runs, almost certainly not an issue here. Also, a crossover most certainly can handle full duplex

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-28 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:33:03AM -0500, Dave Reed wrote: > The Linux box is no less secure if you it all properly configured and > keep up with security updates. The Linksys routers are just simpler > since by default they don't (as far as I know) listen for incoming > connections. Actually, I

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:13:18PM -0500, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - then the best approach > > is to buy a 4-port Linksys DSL/Cable "router". These provide for basic > > firewalling and NAT functionality and will allow your wife's computer to > > conn

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-28 Thread Dave Reed
> X-Authentication-Warning: rlevesque.com: dominic set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >using -f > Cc: > Gcc: nnfolder:gnus-mail > From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > A cross-

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Keith Morse
On 27 Dec 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > I guess the relative cost of the methods might depends on the cost > of these cables. My computer is in the basement while my wife > computer is in the living room above. I might need somewhere like > 30-40 feet of cable to link both computers. If the

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > A cross-over cable should not be more expensive than a regular cable > (it's the same wire just connected to different pins at one end), but > it may be more difficult to find in a store. Since

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Dave Reed
> From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > What do I need to connect these computers? > > > > Depends on what you mean by "connect". Do you just want to share files > > and/or a printer? Samb

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What do I need to connect these computers? > > Depends on what you mean by "connect". Do you just want to share files > and/or a printer? Samba will allow you to do that. Will the "main > computer" be conn

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:36:31PM -0500, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > > Even though I have been using Linux since RH4.1, I have only used > > my computer as a stand alone machine. Now, my wife has bought a > > new computer to run M$ ( which I will conf

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:36:31PM -0500, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > Even though I have been using Linux since RH4.1, I have only used > my computer as a stand alone machine. Now, my wife has bought a > new computer to run M$ ( which I will configure as a dual boot M$ > win98 and RH7.2 ). The m

Re: Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Dave Reed
> From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Hi, > > Even though I have been using Linux since RH4.1, I have only used > my computer as a stand alone machine. Now, my wife has bought a > new computer to run M$ ( which I will configure as a dual boot M$ > win98 and RH7.2 ). The main compu

Local network : sharing internet cable connection

2001-12-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Hi, Even though I have been using Linux since RH4.1, I have only used my computer as a stand alone machine. Now, my wife has bought a new computer to run M$ ( which I will configure as a dual boot M$ win98 and RH7.2 ). The main computer, only runs Linux (RH6.2). What do I need to connect thes

Re: Cable connection ...

2001-02-20 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Thanks Mikkel, This did fix the problem. Cheers, Dominic. "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In /etc/modules.conf or /etc/conf.modules, you need to add an entry > alias eth0 ne2k-pci -- Dominic Mitchell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Economics

Re: Cable connection ...

2001-02-20 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On 20 Feb 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > > Thanks for the help Mikkel, > > I got it working, but there are still some quirks namely at the > module level. > > 1) I have to run depmod -a manually as modprobe does not find the >ne2k-pci module. I would like to automate the loading of the >

Re: Cable connection ...

2001-02-20 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Thanks for the help Mikkel, I got it working, but there are still some quirks namely at the module level. 1) I have to run depmod -a manually as modprobe does not find the ne2k-pci module. I would like to automate the loading of the module. Up to now this is causing some problems. 2)

Re: Cable connection ...

2001-02-20 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On 20 Feb 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to configure a cable connection. The Ethernet card is > a SMC1208T which I have been told is compatible with the ne2k-pci > module. The ethernet card seems to be working as the lights are > flashing.

Cable connection ...

2001-02-20 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Hi all, I am trying to configure a cable connection. The Ethernet card is a SMC1208T which I have been told is compatible with the ne2k-pci module. The ethernet card seems to be working as the lights are flashing. I started the module manually: /sbin/dhcpcd modprobe ne2k-pci dhcpcd eth0 Can