>Helo!
>I'm need to setup the Bridge for two Boards on RH9... Can somebody help me?
>
see http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.html
basically :
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig eth1 down
brctl addbr mybridge
brctl stp mybridge off
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:32:51AM -0300, Judson S. Nascimento wrote:
>
> I'm need to setup the Bridge for two Boards on RH9... Can somebody help me?
Isn't this included in the RH kernel by default?
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
Helo!
I'm need to setup the Bridge for two Boards on RH9... Can somebody help me?
Atenciosamente,Judson S. Nascimento
Helo!
I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To:
http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3
I've two NICs on Red Hat Linux 9, and, after setup I only ping 192.168.1.45 (the IP that I associated with mybridge) bu
have ip forwarding enabled? On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Judson S. Nascimento wrote:> Helo!> I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To:> http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3> > I've two NICs on Red Hat Linu
I vaguely seem to remember that you need to enable ip forwarding, but I don't see
it mentioned anywhere in this howto. Do you have ip forwarding enabled?
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Judson S. Nascimento wrote:
> Helo!
> I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following th
Helo!
I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To:
http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3
I've two NICs on Red Hat Linux 9, and, after setup I only ping 192.168.1.45 (the IP that I associated with mybridge) bu
NED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> I've got two networkcards in my rh8 box and need to route / bridge
> across them.
>
> eth0 (192.168.1.1) connected to network1 on 192.168.1.*
> eth1 (192.168.0.1) connected to network2 on 192.168.0.*
>
> how can I get ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got two networkcards in my rh8 box and need to route / bridge
across them.
eth0 (192.168.1.1) connected to network1 on 192.168.1.*
eth1 (192.168.0.1) connected to network2 on 192.168.0.*
how can I get network1 to see network2 and
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:56:33AM -0800, Jeffrey Lawton wrote:
> Does anyone have any specific knowledge HOW BAD a problem this could be
> indicating? Sure it doesn't ID the PCI bridge chip (assumes it's
> transparent - probably a bad assumption), but also (perhaps as a
> re
Does anyone have any specific knowledge HOW BAD a problem this could be
indicating? Sure it doesn't ID the PCI bridge chip (assumes it's
transparent - probably a bad assumption), but also (perhaps as a
result?) it doesn't find my RTC registers, can't start the audio mixer,
doe
can wait
another week on that) There's no onboard video, at least THAT'S real,
it's an nVidia GeForce 2 MX 400 (by a weak vendor but since the support
comes direct from the chip vendor things could be worse). As I said it
doesn't recognize "bridge resource 0", it SEE
> This is about my trials and tribulations trying to bring up a brand new
> 2.4G P4 single CPU Intel motherboard. Does anyone know whether this PCI
> bridge is "non-transparent" or has any issues that require "special"
> support? (boot returns "unsupported bri
This is about my trials and tribulations trying to bring up a brand new
2.4G P4 single CPU Intel motherboard. Does anyone know whether this PCI
bridge is "non-transparent" or has any issues that require "special"
support? (boot returns "unsupported bridge resource 0: ass
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 11:04, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> I have a new question. I have read somewhere that I cant use ipchains
> and iptables at the same time. Now I have ipchain on my rh7.2. I have
> enabled iptables when I compiled the kernel, but how do I prevent
> ipchain to be loaded on boot?
> I
I find out if I did so?
> > Knut
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On Mon, 2002-08-26
> at
> > 06:58, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> > > > My ISP allow 2 Ip-adresses but I have 2 PC's so I thoug
masquerading when I compiled the kernel.
> > How can I find out if I did so?
> > Knut
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On Mon, 2002-08-26
> at
> > 06:58, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> > > >
kernel.
> How can I find out if I did so?
> Knut
>
>
>
>
> --- Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at
> 06:58, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> > > My ISP allow 2 Ip-adresses but I have 2 PC's so I thought I could
> > wo
kernel.
How can I find out if I did so?
Knut
--- Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at
06:58, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> > My ISP allow 2 Ip-adresses but I have 2 PC's so I thought I could
> work
> > arond this problem using bridge
>
>
Ok. But what is NAT?
Is there an NAT HOWTO I can find on google?
Knut
--- Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at
06:58, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> > My ISP allow 2 Ip-adresses but I have 2 PC's so I thought I could
> work
> > arond this pro
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 06:58, Knut Ove Hauge wrote:
> My ISP allow 2 Ip-adresses but I have 2 PC's so I thought I could work
> arond this problem using bridge
2 IP's isn't enough for 2 PC + the router. NAT is easier to setup and
more secure than bridging, so unless y
My ISP allow 2 Ip-adresses but I have 2 PC's so I thought I could work
arond this problem using bridge
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: > I don't think you want a
bridge, you want IPTables with NAT, or
> ipchains
> with masquerading.
> By my reading, if the adsl modem ex
I don't think you want a bridge, you want IPTables with NAT, or ipchains
with masquerading.
By my reading, if the adsl modem expects to speak to more than one computer
at a time then it will be a router and have multiple ethernet outlets. It is
unlikely that the interface at the other end of
I have 2 windows boxes and want them to connect to my linuz box which
is connected to internet through a adsl modem.
The Linuz box has 2 nics , one for the internet connection (eth0) and 1
(eth1)to the hub where the windows boxes are connected.
I have installed bridge-utils-0.9.5-1 and enabled IP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Help !!! Apache error: Failure of server APACHE bridge:
>Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 15:21:59 -0400
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > hi all,
> > can any of you apache gurus tell me how "
>
>
> hi all,
> can any of you apache gurus tell me how "Failure of server APACHE bridge:"
> please help me out. This is a weird problem I've ever seen till date.
> I hope that some of you must have faced this problems.
> any suggestions will be
hi all,
can any of you apache gurus tell me how "Failure of server APACHE bridge:"
please help me out. This is a weird problem I've ever seen till date.
I hope that some of you must have faced this problems.
any suggestions will be greately appreciated.
-
I have the bridge comming up and the STP protocol is in the forwarding state
instead of disabled. I still can not ping the other network though and I
don't know why ... no packets are being forwarded by the bridge.
I do get the macs of the computers and router from the other side of the
b
Hi.
Anybody used gnome bridge control on a redhat 7.2
I can't get it to work. I have 2 nics and try to
connect eth0 and eth1. I get port closed or in unknown mode.
=
Investigating the Norwegain 4.th Secret Service
The multiheaded animal.
http://hjem.sol.no/altiett/knut_ove_hauge_kuren
Does anyone know if you need to netfilter patch in order to run a bridge
with vtun? I started looking into this a few months back and never had time
to implement it ... after having read more I am finding that I have more
questions. I guess what I am wondering is does the vtun or bridge traffic
> No patch or project AFAIK. Built-in already. I saw in described in
> Netfilter documentation.
I've been looking for a reference to this in the docs, but seem to be
overlooking it. Do you know what doc this is can be found in?
Thanks,
Chad
___
> No patch or project AFAIK. Built-in already. I saw in described in
> Netfilter documentation.
Whoa! Looked all over that a while back and don't remember seeing it at all.
I guess I need to start with the basic components and work up from there
huh! Thanks this should help a great deal.
Chad
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote:
> Someone said a brige is not filtered and although this is true someone wrote
> a patch for 2.2 to add a bridgein rule to the ipchains. Does anyone know if
> a project such as this exists for netfilter?
No patch or project AFAIK. Built-in alre
the two linux boxes. Since bridges are transparent it should not matter that
it is not the router.
What would happen if I setup one network on 192.168.1.0 the other on
192.168.2.0 and set the bridge up on 192.168.0.0 with a netmask of
255.255.0.0 would this not make the bridge forward all traffic
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:57:50PM -0600, Chad and Doria Skinner wrote:
: > The easiest answer? Don't use a bridge. If you do your VPN using
: > FreeSWAN, it will work properly, and you will have the benefits of using
: > IPSec (reliable, heavily tested, inter-operability
> The easiest answer? Don't use a bridge. If you do your VPN using
> FreeSWAN, it will work properly, and you will have the benefits of using
> IPSec (reliable, heavily tested, inter-operability with other VPN
> solutions,
> etc.).
I thought about using cipe directly, but
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> Anyhow, does anyone have any interest in seeing alternate kernel releases
> that are equivalent to the RH kernels, but add FreeSWAN functionality?
yes.
charles
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTE
both sides of a brige
: cause problems and how can I stop dhcp from passing through the bridge?
The easiest answer? Don't use a bridge. If you do your VPN using
FreeSWAN, it will work properly, and you will have the benefits of using
IPSec (reliable, heavily tested, inter-operability with othe
On 28 Nov 2001, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > Which brings me to the question the DSL router on network 2 and the first
> > linux box are both running DHCP will this cause problems? How can I block
> > the DHCP traffic through the bridge?
>
> You can't block the traffic with a
sides of a brige
> cause problems and how can I stop dhcp from passing through the bridge?
A bridge, by definition, will not block packets of a given type.
> Which brings me to the question the DSL router on network 2 and the first
> linux box are both running DHCP will this cause pro
Well, I've done a lot of reading and am planning on playing this weekend.
Think I've got a problem before I even start though. For those who don't
want the details the question is will running DHCP on both sides of a brige
cause problems and how can I stop dhcp from passing thr
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good resource on how to setup a bridge two
> connect two private networks across the internet? I know vtun and
> cipe say they can do it, but I can not find any information on how?
> Anyone have ideas or
Does anyone know of a good resource on how to setup a bridge two
connect two private networks across the internet? I know vtun and
cipe say they can do it, but I can not find any information on how?
Anyone have ideas or suggestions?
Thanks,
Chad
--
Pop3Now Personal, Get quick remote access
ADSL ROUTER
|
|
Bridge
|
|
Firewall
|
|
PRIVATE NETWORK
I guess the key to this even having any hope of working is if IPCHAINS (or
whatever it's called now) get processed before packets are
bridged. i.e. If I put an input-
ADSL ROUTER
|
|
Bridge
|
|
Firewall
|
|
PRIVATE NETWORK
I guess the key to this even having any hope of working is if IPCHAINS (or
whatever it's called now) get processed before packets are
bridged. i.e. If I put an input-
I have 2 NIC's eth0 and eth1(Intelpro 100),and i can't find this
ftp://shadow.cabi.net/pub/Linux/BRCFG.tgz in this place,i've tryed other
bridge related software listed in fresmeat.net but i doesn't know if that
softs really works.I set my cards to work in PROMISC mode but
46 matches
Mail list logo
