I would like to install the bwshare module (
http://www.topology.org/src/bwshare/README.html ) for apache 2. However
this page says that I should put the source files for bwshare into my
apache source directory and reconfigure apache. However to my knowledge
redhat doesn't give the source for
Hi everyone,
I have been trying to install or upgrade my apache 1.3 (which came by
default with Redhat 7.3) to apache 2.0. I tried following two documents -
one from tldp.org and another one from the apache website. however i end
up getting confused.
are there any other good documents around
Humphries wrote:
> Can anyone advise whether apache 2.0 (as provided in Redhat 9) is stable?
>
> Edwin Humphries,
> Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.ironstone.com.au
> Phone: 02 4233 2285
> Fax: 02 4233 2299
> Mobile: 0419 233 051
>
>
Can anyone advise whether apache 2.0 (as provided in Redhat 9) is stable?
Edwin Humphries,
Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ironstone.com.au
Phone: 02 4233 2285
Fax: 02 4233 2299
Mobile: 0419 233 051
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Fontenot, Paul wrote:
I have just brought a RH 8.0 webserver online for internal systems
monitoring (BigBrother), and I am receiving this error in my logs:
Symbolic link not allowed: /var/www/html/bb
I'm stumped, it's my first run in with Apache 2.0 and after reading
everything
I have just brought a RH 8.0 webserver online for internal systems
monitoring (BigBrother), and I am receiving this error in my logs:
Symbolic link not allowed: /var/www/html/bb
I'm stumped, it's my first run in with Apache 2.0 and after reading
everything I could at apache.org
I have a 7.3 system that I would like to use as a webserver. I want to use Apache 2.0
instead of 1.3. I did an rpm -e of the 3 apache rpms on the system (apache, config,
and manuals). I downloaded httpd-2.0.40-11.i386.rpm, httpd-devel-2.0.40-11.i386.rpm,
and httpd-manual-2.0.40-11.i386.rpm
Todd A. Jacobs,
On Thursday January 23, 2003 05:09, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> I want a particular URL to disallow indexing. I have the following
> .htaccess file:
>
>
> Options -Indexes
>
>
> that is chmod 644, and "AllowOverride Indexes" in main configuration.
> Unfortun
I want a particular URL to disallow indexing. I have the following
.htaccess file:
Options -Indexes
that is chmod 644, and "AllowOverride Indexes" in main configuration.
Unfortunately, all I get is error 500 when I attempt to access specific
files from that di
Hi,
> > I like it that RedHat is pushing the newest technology in the 8.0
release
> > because it will very probably get the software to production quality
faster,
> > but I wouldn't build a production server on it :)
>
> Would it best to downgrade apache to the 1.x version such as RH 7.3
> ver.?
your httpd.conf. The bundled PHP version does not support it. This is very
> annoying, but you can expect things like this when the manual says:
> "Warning: Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither
> on Unix nor on Windows."
>
> PHP 4.3 is alr
ke this when the manual says:
"Warning: Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither
on Unix nor on Windows."
PHP 4.3 is already a lot better, but still experimental. The same warning
applies.
I like it that RedHat is pushing the newest technology in the 8.0 relea
Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
My questions are:
Is the 'stock' apache with RH 8.0 compiled for php support?
Is it a module that needs to be put in the httpd.conf?
Is there a new php rpm available any where?
There are bugs in everything, and I'm sure that RH 8.0 has bugs in it's
apache and php.
How
I would like to learn PHP. I was reading on the PHP website that there
is a problem with the version of apache that ships with RH 8.0.
However, since then a new version of PHP has been released which I'm
guessing has solved the problems with apache 2.x.
My questions are:
Is the 'stock' apache w
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
Clean install RH 8.0 and Apache 2.0
.htaccess directories return a page not found error (similar to a missing
website error)
the directories are called out as AuthConfig All but no luck.
Am I missing something with the stock config?
Thanks,
Jay
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
Hi Doug,
Op vrijdag 4 oktober 2002 16:41 schreef Doug:
> Symbolic link not allowed: /home/doug/public_html/oldhtml
Have not worked with apache 2.0 yet, but I think you need to set
Options +FollowSymlinks
cheers,
Rob
--
The church is near but the road is icy; the bar is far away but I w
At 10:41 04/10/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Someone else on this list mentioned that perhaps the rh8.0 upgrade
overwrites httpd.conf. Would be worth checking for backup copies
in the conf directory.
Just a wild guess...
ttfn
nick
>update..
>
>i'm now getting in the error_log
>
>Symbolic link
update..
i'm now getting in the error_log
Symbolic link not allowed: /home/doug/public_html/oldhtml
-rwxrwxrwx1 root root 111 Oct 3 22:17 htaccess
-rw-r--r--1 root root0 Oct 4 00:44 me.txt
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Oct 3 21:44 news ->
/mn
All,
I'm stumped!
I'm trying to setup in my home dir pubic_html to do Indexes, within this dir
I have some links to other dir's on the system. I had this working under
RH7.3 (apache 1.3), but under 2.0 it will not show the linked folders just a
file i put into test it.
this is the error i receiv
Hi,
Are there any security or anti hacking enhancements that Apache 2 has
compared to 1.3.x? What are the major advantages of 2 as opposed to 1.3?
Thanks,
Dan Sabo
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/l
26 matches
Mail list logo