Installing a 3rd party module for apache 2.0 on redhat 9

2003-09-23 Thread Justin Rush
I would like to install the bwshare module ( http://www.topology.org/src/bwshare/README.html ) for apache 2. However this page says that I should put the source files for bwshare into my apache source directory and reconfigure apache. However to my knowledge redhat doesn't give the source for

Upgrading/Installing Apache 2.0

2003-09-19 Thread rahul b jain cs student
Hi everyone, I have been trying to install or upgrade my apache 1.3 (which came by default with Redhat 7.3) to apache 2.0. I tried following two documents - one from tldp.org and another one from the apache website. however i end up getting confused. are there any other good documents around

Re: Apache 2.0 stability

2003-08-29 Thread Didier Casse
Humphries wrote: > Can anyone advise whether apache 2.0 (as provided in Redhat 9) is stable? > > Edwin Humphries, > Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.ironstone.com.au > Phone: 02 4233 2285 > Fax: 02 4233 2299 > Mobile: 0419 233 051 > >

Apache 2.0 stability

2003-08-29 Thread Edwin Humphries
Can anyone advise whether apache 2.0 (as provided in Redhat 9) is stable? Edwin Humphries, Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ironstone.com.au Phone: 02 4233 2285 Fax: 02 4233 2299 Mobile: 0419 233 051 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: Apache 2.0

2003-02-22 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Fontenot, Paul wrote: I have just brought a RH 8.0 webserver online for internal systems monitoring (BigBrother), and I am receiving this error in my logs: Symbolic link not allowed: /var/www/html/bb I'm stumped, it's my first run in with Apache 2.0 and after reading everything

Apache 2.0

2003-02-21 Thread Fontenot, Paul
I have just brought a RH 8.0 webserver online for internal systems monitoring (BigBrother), and I am receiving this error in my logs: Symbolic link not allowed: /var/www/html/bb I'm stumped, it's my first run in with Apache 2.0 and after reading everything I could at apache.org

Install Apache 2.0 on 7.3

2003-02-12 Thread Mailing Lists
I have a 7.3 system that I would like to use as a webserver. I want to use Apache 2.0 instead of 1.3. I did an rpm -e of the 3 apache rpms on the system (apache, config, and manuals). I downloaded httpd-2.0.40-11.i386.rpm, httpd-devel-2.0.40-11.i386.rpm, and httpd-manual-2.0.40-11.i386.rpm

Re: Apache 2.0 and disallowed indexes

2003-01-23 Thread Brian Ashe
Todd A. Jacobs, On Thursday January 23, 2003 05:09, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > I want a particular URL to disallow indexing. I have the following > .htaccess file: > > > Options -Indexes > > > that is chmod 644, and "AllowOverride Indexes" in main configuration. > Unfortun

Apache 2.0 and disallowed indexes

2003-01-23 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
I want a particular URL to disallow indexing. I have the following .htaccess file: Options -Indexes that is chmod 644, and "AllowOverride Indexes" in main configuration. Unfortunately, all I get is error 500 when I attempt to access specific files from that di

Re: RH 8.0, Apache 2.0, PHP questions

2003-01-05 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, > > I like it that RedHat is pushing the newest technology in the 8.0 release > > because it will very probably get the software to production quality faster, > > but I wouldn't build a production server on it :) > > Would it best to downgrade apache to the 1.x version such as RH 7.3 > ver.?

Re: RH 8.0, Apache 2.0, PHP questions

2003-01-05 Thread Thomas E. Dukes
your httpd.conf. The bundled PHP version does not support it. This is very > annoying, but you can expect things like this when the manual says: > "Warning: Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither > on Unix nor on Windows." > > PHP 4.3 is alr

Re: RH 8.0, Apache 2.0, PHP questions

2003-01-05 Thread Sander Steffann
ke this when the manual says: "Warning: Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on Unix nor on Windows." PHP 4.3 is already a lot better, but still experimental. The same warning applies. I like it that RedHat is pushing the newest technology in the 8.0 relea

Re: RH 8.0, Apache 2.0, PHP questions

2003-01-04 Thread Ben Russo
Thomas E. Dukes wrote: My questions are: Is the 'stock' apache with RH 8.0 compiled for php support? Is it a module that needs to be put in the httpd.conf? Is there a new php rpm available any where? There are bugs in everything, and I'm sure that RH 8.0 has bugs in it's apache and php. How

RH 8.0, Apache 2.0, PHP questions

2003-01-04 Thread Thomas E. Dukes
I would like to learn PHP. I was reading on the PHP website that there is a problem with the version of apache that ships with RH 8.0. However, since then a new version of PHP has been released which I'm guessing has solved the problems with apache 2.x. My questions are: Is the 'stock' apache w

Re: Apache 2.0 and .htaccess (Out of Office)

2002-11-15 Thread Jacob Petrie
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please contact the IT help desk. Thank you, Jacob Petrie Web Systems/Information Technology Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.662.2140 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l

Re: Apache 2.0 and .htaccess (Out of Office)

2002-11-15 Thread Jacob Petrie
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please contact the IT help desk. Thank you, Jacob Petrie Web Systems/Information Technology Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.662.2140 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l

Re: Apache 2.0 and .htaccess (Out of Office)

2002-11-15 Thread Jacob Petrie
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please contact the IT help desk. Thank you, Jacob Petrie Web Systems/Information Technology Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.662.2140 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l

Re: Apache 2.0 and .htaccess (Out of Office)

2002-11-14 Thread Jacob Petrie
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please contact the IT help desk. Thank you, Jacob Petrie Web Systems/Information Technology Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.662.2140 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l

Re: Apache 2.0 and .htaccess (Out of Office)

2002-11-14 Thread Jacob Petrie
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please contact the IT help desk. Thank you, Jacob Petrie Web Systems/Information Technology Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.662.2140 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l

Re: Apache 2.0 and .htaccess (Out of Office)

2002-11-14 Thread Jacob Petrie
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please contact the IT help desk. Thank you, Jacob Petrie Web Systems/Information Technology Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.662.2140 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l

Apache 2.0 and .htaccess

2002-11-14 Thread Jay Hodges
Clean install RH 8.0 and Apache 2.0 .htaccess directories return a page not found error (similar to a missing website error) the directories are called out as AuthConfig All but no luck. Am I missing something with the stock config? Thanks, Jay -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe

Re: apache 2.0 (RH8)

2002-10-04 Thread Rob
Hi Doug, Op vrijdag 4 oktober 2002 16:41 schreef Doug: > Symbolic link not allowed: /home/doug/public_html/oldhtml Have not worked with apache 2.0 yet, but I think you need to set Options +FollowSymlinks cheers, Rob -- The church is near but the road is icy; the bar is far away but I w

Re: apache 2.0 (RH8)

2002-10-04 Thread Nick Lindsell
At 10:41 04/10/2002 -0400, you wrote: Someone else on this list mentioned that perhaps the rh8.0 upgrade overwrites httpd.conf. Would be worth checking for backup copies in the conf directory. Just a wild guess... ttfn nick >update.. > >i'm now getting in the error_log > >Symbolic link

apache 2.0 (RH8)

2002-10-04 Thread Doug
update.. i'm now getting in the error_log Symbolic link not allowed: /home/doug/public_html/oldhtml -rwxrwxrwx1 root root 111 Oct 3 22:17 htaccess -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Oct 4 00:44 me.txt lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Oct 3 21:44 news -> /mn

apache 2.0 (RH8)

2002-10-04 Thread Doug
All, I'm stumped! I'm trying to setup in my home dir pubic_html to do Indexes, within this dir I have some links to other dir's on the system. I had this working under RH7.3 (apache 1.3), but under 2.0 it will not show the linked folders just a file i put into test it. this is the error i receiv

Apache 2.0 security compared to 1.3.x

2002-07-23 Thread Dan Sabo
Hi, Are there any security or anti hacking enhancements that Apache 2 has compared to 1.3.x? What are the major advantages of 2 as opposed to 1.3? Thanks, Dan Sabo ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/l