...just like the ".0" releases are alpha, I suppose...
Are we talking about RH or MS? ;<)
Tom Curl
Enertex Systems
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:52:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer
> production code.
...just like the ".0" releases are alpha, I suppose...
SCNR,
Thomas
--
"Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text onl
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer
> production code.
>
Um, I'm not sure if that applies to RH distribs as well as kernel
versions. I think RH has a different versioning system.
-- Generated Signature --
Think
Yeah everybody's right, I've lost my mind! Sorry.
Tom Curl
Enertex Systems
Jeremiah Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/03/01 05:02 PM
Please respond to redhat-list
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Anybody
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer
> production code.
>
Not historically, Red Hat's beta releases are covered in the beta
program and in Rawhide releases. Mind you, some release numbers have
been skipped in the
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
> Anybody heard if/when Red Hat 7.2 might be available? Given all the
> problems I've seen on this list with RH 7.0 I think I'd rather wait for
> it.
Hmmm... Already gave up on 7.1, huh? 8^)
On a more serious vein, looking at the mail
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer
> production code.
>
> Tom Curl
> Enertex Systems
>
Not true. Odd releases aren't beta, that is.
Odd minor numbers on the kernel (1.3, 2.1, 2.3, etc.) indicate
development releases. Red Hat 5.1 just happens to be the
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:52:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer
> production code.
That's a discombobulation. Maybe you are thinking of kernel releases?
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECT
They are? Gee.. I thought the beta team handled beta stuff. Last I checked you could
certainly *purchase* redhat 6.1, and 5.1..
-miah
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:52:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer
> production code.
oth riddled with security holes.
> -miah
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:39:45PM -0500, Jerry Human wrote:
> > Anybody heard if/when Red Hat 7.2 might be available? Given all the
> > problems I've seen on this list with RH 7.0 I think I'd rather wait for
> > it.
>
Subject: Re: Anybody heard ...
I think redhat 7.1 will be available far before 7.2.
-miah
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:39:45PM -0500, Jerry Human wrote:
> Anybody heard if/when Red Hat 7.2 might be available? Given all the
> problems I've seen on this list with RH 7.0
I think redhat 7.1 will be available far before 7.2.
-miah
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:39:45PM -0500, Jerry Human wrote:
> Anybody heard if/when Red Hat 7.2 might be available? Given all the
> problems I've seen on this list with RH 7.0 I think I'd rather wait for
&
Anybody heard if/when Red Hat 7.2 might be available? Given all the
problems I've seen on this list with RH 7.0 I think I'd rather wait for
it.
Thanks.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listi
13 matches
Mail list logo
