Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

On Sunday 06 July 2003 14:38, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > Your setup is very similar to what I have setup here. I too, frontend > an exchange server with sendmail/spamass-milter/spamassassin. Your > document is not a bad start for people wanting to frontend another > mail server using SA. i.e. procm

RE: Some results of the anti-spam testing

> -Original Message- > From: MKlinke > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 11:49 PM > Subject: Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing > > > On Sunday 06 July 2003 03:02, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote: > > >Didn't mean

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

On Sunday 06 July 2003 03:02, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote: > >Didn't mean to send this to the RH list but what the heck! As I > > said to my office mates, let me know if you have any questions! > > Yes. Since you've come this far, how about a quick Mini-HOWTO messag

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote: Didn't mean to send this to the RH list but what the heck! As I said to my office mates, let me know if you have any questions! Yes. Since you've come this far, how about a quick Mini-HOWTO message on what you did? That way the rest of us can compare notes. --

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

of view this testing has been a resounding success! In > the past 30 hours the anti-spam mail server I set up has intercepted > a little over 3300 spam messages that would have been normally > delivered to our email accounts. > > About 500 of these have been passed along to our regul

Some results of the anti-spam testing

urs the anti-spam mail server I set up has intercepted a little over 3300 spam messages that would have been normally delivered to our email accounts. About 500 of these have been passed along to our regular mail server but marked with the *SPAM* Subject: and the X-Spam-Level Header entr

RE: sendmail anti-spam feature...

> -Original Message- > From: João Borsoi Soares > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:38 AM > Subject: Re: sendmail anti-spam feature... > > > > From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RELAY > > > > You still have FEATURE(`relay_mail_from&#

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

Em Sex, 2003-02-14 às 18:05, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 11:06, João Borsoi Soares wrote: > > Em Sex, 2003-02-14 às 14:29, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > > > > > > Email addresses don't belong in /etc/mail/access. You need to put his > > > IP address there with the RELAY option,

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 11:06, João Borsoi Soares wrote: > Em Sex, 2003-02-14 às 14:29, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > > > > Email addresses don't belong in /etc/mail/access. You need to put his > > IP address there with the RELAY option, and run 'make' in /etc/mail. > > Sorry, but I think it's possib

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

> >Email addresses don't belong in /etc/mail/access. You need to put his > >IP address there with the RELAY option, and run 'make' in /etc/mail. > > > > The client is on dynamic IP - he'll need to relay the netblock of the ISPs > dialup lines, which as there is a (supposedly) active spammer in >

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

Em Sex, 2003-02-14 às 14:29, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 06:13, João Borsoi Soares wrote: > > I want to use an anti-spam feature in my sendmail. I tried: > > > > FEATURE(dnsbl,`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl > > > > and it works fine. The pr

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

At 08:29 14/02/2003 -0800, you wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 06:13, João Borsoi Soares wrote: > I want to use an anti-spam feature in my sendmail. I tried: > > FEATURE(dnsbl,`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl > > and it works fine. The problem is that one of my clients are in the >

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 06:13, João Borsoi Soares wrote: > I want to use an anti-spam feature in my sendmail. I tried: > > FEATURE(dnsbl,`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl > > and it works fine. The problem is that one of my clients are in the > blackhole list, but he is not a s

Re: sendmail anti-spam feature...

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:13:59PM -0200, João Borsoi Soares wrote: > I want to use an anti-spam feature in my sendmail. I tried: > > FEATURE(dnsbl,`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl > > and it works fine. The problem is that one of my clients are in the > blackhole list,

sendmail anti-spam feature...

Hello list. I want to use an anti-spam feature in my sendmail. I tried: FEATURE(dnsbl,`relays.osirusoft.com')dnl and it works fine. The problem is that one of my clients are in the blackhole list, but he is not a spammer. Actually it is a problem with his ISP. He uses dynamic IP. I wond

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

--- From: Sander Steffann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?Hi, Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will cause everything sent to your

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

it out to me. Maybe it wasn't the osirusoft, but it was one of the 4 that everyone seems to use. - -Original Message- From: Sander Steffann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? RE:

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?Hi, > Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry. It is incorrect, and will > cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected. This is stated > on their website. I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I wouldn't > swear to it. I don'

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

Title: RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Be sure to change the osirusoft.com entry.  It is incorrect, and will cause everything sent to your machine to be rejected.  This is stated on their website.  I think is should be osirusoft.net, but I

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

> -Original Message- > From: Toto Gamez > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:25 PM > Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? > > > thanks all for the reply, > > i cheked and there's no sendmail-cf installed, Im using RH7.0 > my sendmail version is se

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

Toto Gamez said: > thanks all for the reply, > > i cheked and there's no sendmail-cf installed, Im using RH7.0 my > sendmail version is sendmail-8.11.0-8 that comes with the cd. but i dont > have the rh7.0 installation cd, is it okey to use the sendmail-cf that > comes from rh7.2 installation (send

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

3) or do i really need to get the same version as with sendmail that i use     regards, Toto - Original Message - From: Cowles, Steve To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? > ---

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

> -Original Message- > From: Toto Gamez > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:07 PM > Subject: Sendmail anti-spam feature? > > > I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc is > at /etc/mail and my senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued >

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Toto Gamez wrote: > I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc is at /etc/mail and my >senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued "m4 /etc/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" i >got an error "m4: /etc/sendmail.mc: No such file or direct

Sendmail anti-spam feature?

I tried to activate the sendmail anti spam. My sendamil.mc is at /etc/mail and my senmail.cf file is at /etc. whn i issued "m4 /etc/sendmail.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf" i got an error "m4: /etc/sendmail.mc: No such file or directory". I chang my command to "m4 /

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ya know, I read that, & It just now dawned on me that "yes you can"... - -Original Message- From: Cowles, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:35 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Se

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

> -Original Message- > From: Burke, Thomas G. > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:11 AM > Subject: RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature? > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ahh, well. I added the northgrum e-mail server to my access.db, &

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:28 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature? On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:51:28AM -0800, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > How can I disable the anti-spam for certain domains? For some > reason, my work is

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:51:28AM -0800, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > How can I disable the anti-spam for certain domains? For some > reason, my work is in at least 2 of the black-hole lists - That seems > odd to me... Maybe they have (or had at some point) open relays? Wouldn't be

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 How can I disable the anti-spam for certain domains? For some reason, my work is in at least 2 of the black-hole lists - That seems odd to me... - -Original Message- From: Burke, Thomas G. Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:04 PM To: '[

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 won't 'delay_checks' bypass the anti-spam? (I am apparently reading this incorrectly) - -Original Message- From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:31 AM To: '[EMAIL PRO

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 06:44:38AM -0800, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > From sendmail's site, I see I need to add FEATURE(`dnsbl') , which > defaults to MAPS, which is a subscription-based service. Is there a > way to set this up to use a database from someone who is not > subscription-based? A

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Burke, Thomas G. wrote: | Once you put these in, what do you need to do to update the | configuration? Run the m4 sendmail.mc > sendmail.cf command listed at the top of sendmail.mc, then restart sendmail with "service sendmail restart". - -Rick - --

RE: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Once you put these in, what do you need to do to update the configuration? - -Original Message- From: Rupendra Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sendmail anti-spam

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

> > > >Hey gang, > > > > I'm trying to figure out how to set up anti-spam with sendmail... I > >know I need to add a feature, but I'm not sure I understand > >correctly. > > > > From sendmail's site, I see I need

Re: Sendmail anti-spam feature?

At 06:44 10/01/2003 -0800, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey gang, I'm trying to figure out how to set up anti-spam with sendmail... I know I need to add a feature, but I'm not sure I understand correctly. From sendmail's site, I se

Sendmail anti-spam feature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey gang, I'm trying to figure out how to set up anti-spam with sendmail... I know I need to add a feature, but I'm not sure I understand correctly. From sendmail's site, I see I need to add FEATURE(`dnsbl') , wh

Re: ANTI-SPAM & ANTI-VIRUS provisions

in transit. It is already done, it will save your work - and you will end up w/ a product w/ no security holes. [unless of course, you introduce them.] js On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 04:20, Hugo Tavares wrote: > Greetings > > I'm starting to implement an ANTI-SPAM and ANTI-VIRUS syst

Re: ANTI-SPAM & ANTI-VIRUS provisions

I use MailScanner on my website e-mail server, it works beautifully. -Jon On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 07:20, Hugo Tavares wrote: > Greetings > > I'm starting to implement an ANTI-SPAM and ANTI-VIRUS system with sendmail. > I've searched for documentation and I found some bu

ANTI-SPAM & ANTI-VIRUS provisions

Greetings I'm starting to implement an ANTI-SPAM and ANTI-VIRUS system with sendmail. I've searched for documentation and I found some but I would like to hear some opinions about what is the best software to use to provide this. Note: open-source/freeware or GPL cheers -- r

Re: TMDA anti-spam software

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > Is anyone using Tagged Message Delivery Agent to filter > spam? It uses a combination of whitelists, blacklists, and confirmation I use it here. It does *not* play well with mailing lists, but does a good job of protecting the pri

TMDA anti-spam software

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is anyone using Tagged Message Delivery Agent to filter spam? It uses a combination of whitelists, blacklists, and confirmation messages to ensure that you only get mail from known senders and/or real human beings with working reply

Re: Anti-Spam

my qmail sends all messages to the postmaster or whoever you specify on my box, but only if the user does not exist on my domain. Then I check that box ever so often to see who's sending to the wrong address. You will be surprised how many ISPs have a catchall mailbox! One ISP I did work for se

Re: Anti-Spam

Are you looking to have everyone's potential spam sent to you/a generic mailbox? While this might seem like a good idea, in theory, false positives do wind up in there, and you might wind up viewing messages that you might not otherwise see or want to. On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Anthony Hologounis w

Re: Anti-Spam

I think I tried that but Procmail runs as the user so that wouldnt work unless I use 666 permissions or like a previous poster mentioned , put all users in the same group anddo 660 permissions On Thursday 04 July 2002 01:22, Mike Burger wrote: > You definitely don't need 666 permissions on the

Re: Anti-Spam

You definitely don't need 666 permissions on the folder. If you're testing it, you could just redirect it to a folder/file in your own home directory...like /home/anthony/mail/SPAM. On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Anthony Hologounis wrote: > Let me ask, so this is the best way to handle spam? > > Righ t

Re: Anti-Spam

As I understand it, permissions are like RWX , RWX , RWX Owner, GroupOfOwner, RestofWorld So if all users are in the same group, say 'users', then you could do : chmod 660 /var/spool/mail/SPAM to change the permisions on the folder so only group members and the owner can r

Re: Anti-Spam

Let me ask, so this is the best way to handle spam? Righ tnow I have a folder called /var/spool/mail/SPAM that has 666 permissions. I think this is dangerous but I want to be able to collect all of the spam in one folder. So I can see how well my procmail/spamassassin settigns are working.

Re: Anti-Spam

Yes, actually, I do. The problem, I think, is that you're trying to have each user's account write the spam to /var/spool/mail/caughtspam. Only one user can own that file, and if it's not been set with permissions to allow world to write to it, they won't be able to. Hence the reason I filter

Re: Anti-Spam

"K.Deepak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear Harry, > > I tried for the past two days , but all in vain. i am not >able > to deliver the spammed messages into the folder caughtspam. I gave in the addtional > entries given by you . the procmail log says "No match found f

Re: Anti-Spam

Look in ~/caughtspam Personally, I use the example put forth in the SpamAssassin docs: :0: * ^Subject:.*\*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*\* $HOME/mail/caughtspam Since SA usually puts *SPAM* into the subject line, as well as the X-Spam-Flag, this usually catches it with no problem. On Tue, 25 Jun 20

Re: Anti-Spam

Dear Harry, I tried for the past two days , but all in vain. i am not able to deliver the spammed messages into the folder caughtspam. I gave in the addtional entries given by you . the procmail log says "No match found for ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes " . I even tried replacing thi

Re: Anti-Spam

Dear Harry, Oops. forgot to mention an info. i tried the following procmail rule :0fw | spamassassin * ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes caughtspam Regards K.Deepak "K.Deepak" wrote: > Dear Harry, > > I tried for the past two days , but all in vain. i am

Re: Anti-Spam

"K.Deepak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please help me out by telling the exact rules which will make the spamassassing to > deliver the spammed messsages to the folder > /var/spool/mail/caughtspam Sounds like something else is wrong here. If you have the rule you posted: :0fw | spamassass

Re: Anti-Spam

Dear Harry, Thanks for your response. but , i tried the option given in the site http://spamassassin.taint.org/ and wrote the procmail rule something like this ( the procmail rule was written in /etc/procmailrc file ) :0fw | spamassassin * ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes caughtspam (n

Re: Anti-Spam

"K.Deepak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear Brain, > > I have setup spamassassin in a RedHat 7.2 with sendmail > 8.12.3. Please let me know as to how filter all the spammed messages to a > single folder called as spam using procmail. > > It would be also great if you ca

Re: Anti-Spam

On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, K.Deepak wrote: > Dear Brain, > > I have setup spamassassin in a RedHat 7.2 with sendmail > 8.12.3. Please let me know as to how filter all the spammed messages to a > single folder called as spam using procmail. > > It would be also great if you ca

Re: Anti-Spam

Dear Brain, I have setup spamassassin in a RedHat 7.2 with sendmail 8.12.3. Please let me know as to how filter all the spammed messages to a single folder called as spam using procmail. It would be also great if you can give links/documents for installation, configurat

Re[2]: Anti-Spam

Hello daniel, Friday, June 21, 2002, 6:58:32 PM, you textually orated: d> i've heard that "spamassassin" is great d> it's serversoftware though Naah. It's whatever you want it to be. Read below. * KMail and SpamAssassin (thanks to Colm Buckley and Gideon Hallett, 2001-12-16) Spa

Re: Anti-Spam

On 15:58 21 Jun 2002, daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | i've heard that "spamassassin" is great | it's serversoftware though No, you can run it on a personal basis - I do at home and work. But it _may_ also be applied systemwide. -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://w

Re: Anti-Spam

http://www.spamassassin.org On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Schmeits, Roger wrote: > Is there any Antispam software based on Linux out there? > > Thanks. > > Roger > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailma

Re: Anti-Spam

On Friday 21 Jun 2002 06:58 pm, daniel wrote: > i've heard that "spamassassin" is great > it's serversoftware though No, you can run it on your mail from procmail. Install procmail and add the rules as per the documentation. Chris Mason ___ Redhat-

Re: Anti-Spam

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:28:16AM -0500, Schmeits, Roger wrote: > Is there any Antispam software based on Linux out there? > "Based on linux"? Or runs on Linux? Google has plenty of info on this. man procmail, procmail.org (IIRC), among many, many other options. -- Hal Burgiss __

Re: Anti-Spam

e - Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 6:28 AM Subject: Anti-Spam | Is there any Antispam software based on Linux out there? | | Thanks. | | Roger | | | | ___ | Redhat-list mailing list | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/

Re: Anti-Spam

Hello Roger, Friday, June 21, 2002, 9:28:16 AM, you textually orated: SR> Is there any Antispam software based on Linux out there? This works wonderfully. http://www.spamassassin.org/ Have fun, -- _ Brian Ashe

Anti-Spam

Is there any Antispam software based on Linux out there? Thanks. Roger ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Regarding Anti-spam

Dear Linux users , I am using Linux7.1 with sendmail11.0.1. I want to enable following condition in sendmail configuration . Please help me . I am using netscape mail client >From my internal domain , Users should not be able to change the From id field to different domain nam

Re: need help on anti-spam config

gary wrote: > Many thanks for all advise and help... > > I did try by putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 1st line as below in > /etc/mail/access > > # by default we allow relaying from localhost... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Spammers shan't see sunlight here > localhost.localdomainRELAY >

Re: need help on anti-spam config

550 Spammers shan't see sunlight here > localhost.localdomain RELAY > localhostRELAY > 127.0.0.1 RELAY > I don't know how tied you are to sendmail, but the anti-spam features in postfix are really, rea

Re: need help on anti-spam config

rom: Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:55 AM Subject: Re: need help on anti-spam config > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, gary wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > Sorry for been asking the same question, cause I still s

Re: need help on anti-spam config

On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 10:55:23AM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > I hope this helps. You may also find the docs at > http://www.moongroup.com/pages.php?page=docs helpfull. Sorry, I haven't followed the whole thread, but has anybody mentioned postfix? The anti-spam

Re: need help on anti-spam config

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, gary wrote: > Dear all, > > Sorry for been asking the same question, cause I still suffer with mail > spam... > > I been trying on config file in /etc/mail/access or deny I tried to > reject or/and relay by ip or domain name, but looked like whatever setting > that I did,

Re: need help on anti-spam config

Aaahhh...Ooops. On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Mike Burger wrote: > > > "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Thang Nguyen wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access >

Re: need help on anti-spam config

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Mike Burger wrote: > "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Thang Nguyen wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access > > > > > > > > Nope - makemap will put the .db on all by itself. > > > > makemap ha

Re: need help on anti-spam config

"Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Thang Nguyen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access > > > > > Nope - makemap will put the .db on all by itself. > > makemap hash /etc/mail/access < /etc/mail/access > > works just fine.

Re: need help on anti-spam config

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Thang Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access > > Nope - makemap will put the .db on all by itself. makemap hash /etc/mail/access < /etc/mail/access works just fine. ___ Redhat-list mailing li

Re: need help on anti-spam config

Hi, makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access - Original Message - From: "gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 12:55 AM Subject: need help on anti-spam config > Dear all, > > Sorry for been askin

need help on anti-spam config

Dear all, Sorry for been asking the same question, cause I still suffer with mail spam... I been trying on config file in /etc/mail/access or deny I tried to reject or/and relay by ip or domain name, but looked like whatever setting that I did, doesn't take any affect??? as for access file,

Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

ROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:53 PM Subject: Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf > > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 15/02/01 at 19:26 gary wrote: > > > >Yes, I did tried with following f

Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 15/02/01 at 19:26 gary wrote: > >Yes, I did tried with following format in access file > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] REJECT >abc.com REJECT > >This shd deny relay for email add [EMAIL PROTECTED] and all emails from >@abc.co

Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

at as expected... is there any other thing that I need to set in kernel level or other ??? please advise... many thanks... rdgs, gary - Original Message - From: Greg Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: Re: : Re: Se

Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/02/01 at 12:04 gary wrote: > >yes, I did tried that also and 'make' then restart my sendmail, but still >can't block it... > >my access file details as below: >localhost.localdomain RELAY >localhost RELAY >127.0.0.1

Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

vise and thanks. gary - Original Message - From: Greg Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf > > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***

Re: : Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/02/01 at 11:21 gary wrote: > >1st thing, so sorry for the html format been sent to all of you, I've >changed the format to plaintext, :)... > >Thanks for the advise... > >I did followed your instructions, but it doesn't work as what expected.. >As

Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

gary - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf > On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, gary@thongsiek wrote: > > I tried to use Sendmail's Anti-spam filters i

Sendmail: Anti-spam filters with netconf

Dear all,   I tried to use Sendmail's Anti-spam filters in netconf as below:   1. Rejected senders : use email address and error messages   2. 'Relay for' by IP   3. 'Relay for' by name   4. Relay to hosts   I tried on 1 and 2, but it doesn't work as what I exp