On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Jason Hirsch wrote:
> Awhile back someone (with an email @redhat.com) asked in (what i thought
> was) seriousness about a 'service pack' style fix. I read this post and
> think "Wow. To think that for NT all I have to do is run 1 program and
> all the bugs are fixed". Yes,
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:23:51 Jacques Gelinas wrote:
[...]
> You are missing something important. If you only apply the NT service
> pack, then you lack the hotfixes. Applying only service pack is equivalent
> to keep up to date with redhat releases. RedHat do something like 2
> releases a year (6.
Marie Bennington wrote:
>
> What about the GnoRPM? With the webfind feature, I think it's the
> easiest wat to find the updates you need? Or is that the part about
> "pawing through a checklist of 100's?" And what is this autorpm you
> speak of? I am not familiar with it, but am eager to learn.
I was hit by this exploit last week, and after searching deja.com I read
that even the update for bind on the errata page is vulnerable. You must
update to P5 on rawhide.redhat.com to be safe.
-Halcyon
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, M. Erickson wrote:
> where can I get more info on this rootkit and how
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Jason Hirsch wrote:
> Not to push an issue-
>
> Awhile back someone (with an email @redhat.com) asked in (what i thought
> was) seriousness about a 'service pack' style fix. I read this post and
> think "Wow. To think that for NT all I have to do is run 1 program and
> all
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> Why not just use autorpm then? If that's what you want to do, then
> just setup autorpm to point at the updates site, run it nightly, and
> configure it to automatically update all the packages you already have
> installed. You don't have to paw "down a
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 09:14:53AM -0500, Jason Hirsch wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 10:23:28PM -0800, M. Erickson wrote:
> > > where can I get more info on this rootkit and how to defend against it?
> > > some fsck is taking down a couple o
Jason Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not to push an issue-
>
>Awhile back someone (with an email @redhat.com) asked in (what i thought
>was) seriousness about a 'service pack' style fix. I read this post and
>think "Wow. To think that for NT all I have to do is run 1 program and
>all the bu
Jason!
> My firewall is kept up to date, but the machines on the inside? Not worth
> the effort to update stuff that I may or may not use.
I think that is an excellent idea. RedHat could have an RPM style files
where all you did was mount /mnt/cdrom; rpm -Uvh /mnt/cdrom/*.rpm AND a
SRPMS style
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 10:23:28PM -0800, M. Erickson wrote:
> > where can I get more info on this rootkit and how to defend against it?
> > some fsck is taking down a couple of my friends' boxes.
> > /me
>
> ADMROCKS is an attack against
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 10:23:28PM -0800, M. Erickson wrote:
> where can I get more info on this rootkit and how to defend against it?
> some fsck is taking down a couple of my friends' boxes.
> /me
ADMROCKS is an attack against name daemons which are not up
to date. Like lots of other s
http://www.cert.org/current/current_activity.html#bind
"M. Erickson" wrote:
>
> where can I get more info on this rootkit and how to defend against it?
> some fsck is taking down a couple of my friends' boxes.
> /me
>
> Mike Ericks
where can I get more info on this rootkit and how to defend against it?
some fsck is taking down a couple of my friends' boxes.
/me
Mike Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.fix.net/~merickson/
"The world is my country and my reli
13 matches
Mail list logo
