Your description sounds like a spammer, but it's hard to tell. Check
your /var/log/maillog and see what's going on. That IP resolves to
callisto.hmdnsgroup.com.
HTH,
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:31 A
Webmin is your friend. http://www.webmin.com
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know almost
So you can ping your machine from your wife's, but you cannot ping the
wife's from yours.
Sounds like a subnet mask issue, or ICMP filtering. Check that the
subnet masks on both machines match, and try service iptables stop.
HTH,
- nick
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Wilson [mailto:
; made cables crap out due to "what ever wire straight through". You get
> "cross talk" across the pairs and wind up with weird issues.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:37 PM
> To:
Pin 1 is on the left if the "hook" is on the bottom. Like an earlier
poster said, it really doesn't matter what color goes where, as it's the
order that counts. The most common standard used these days (568B) is
as Harold pointed out:
1 White-orange
2 Orange
3 White-green
4 Blue
5 White-blue
6 G
Hi list,
Anyone have any good recommendations for books pertaining to RedHat 9?
I know the docs at redhat.com/docs are excellent for the most part, but
I'm looking for something a bit more. Both dead-tree and electronic
versions welcome. I'm already fairly proficient with RH, but it's
always goo
My DSL provider blocks outgoing SMTP, unless it is from their own SMTP
server. You may need to setup a smarthost from sendmail, to forward the
mail through your ISPs mail server.
Try to telnet to the remote SMTP server on port 25 to test if your ISP
is blocking the mail:
Example$ telnet mx1.redha
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sendmail blocking
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
>
>
> On
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
> Hi redhat-list,
>
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box.
Hi redhat-list,
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gets forwarded to the internal mail server.
An employee
It appears to be back up now, but it's been doing strange things today.
I looks like they shut it down for a few hours this morning as well.
-Original Message-
From: Nick White
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RHN
what's up with
what's up with rhn today?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Make sure that there isn't a firewall that is filtering out GRE traffic.
The firewall could be on the linux box, or it could be somewhere between the
PPTP server and the windows client. I had a similar problem, and it turned
out that we didn't have a static mapping for GRE going through the Cisco
Use this URL instead:
http://www.bynari.net/public/products/InsightServer/insightserver-4.0-5.i386
.rpm
Your original URL redirected to this location, and that's why webmin is
trippin'. Next time, try wget or lynx from the console... I've found those
tools to be very reliable.
Example: wget http
Boot into single user mode, as described in
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/custom-guide/s1-re
scuemode-booting-single.html
Run /usr/sbin/ntsysv and uncheck the service that is failing.
hope this helps,
nw
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Have you tried changing the unicode settings in redhat? I know I've
heard a lot of people having issues with perl due to the unicode setting
in RH9. See
https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-June/msg02860.html for
more info.
hope this helps,
nw
-Original Message-
From: Thomas
nope, it just shows one glibc-2.3.2-11.9 package installed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bret Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: destroyed glibc!
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 19:01, Nick White
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: destroyed glibc!
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:21:33PM -0700, Nick White wrote:
> A user, (who will no longer get root privileges) has totally messed up
> glibc, and the system no longer boots.
A user, (who will no longer get root privileges) has totally messed up
glibc, and the system no longer boots. All that he mentioned was
something about libcommon and libc (glibc?). I can boot RedHat 9 into
rescue mode from the CD-ROM. Since the hard drive is mounted to
/mnt/sysimage, installing
in, and now it sends
everything through procmail. Very weird.
Thanks BT and JG for your help.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bill Tangren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spamassassin and ~/.forward
Nick White wrote:
>
k out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am I
taking the wrong approach? Is there some magic procmail config that
will work for me?
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bill Tangren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spamassassin and ~/
EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bill Tangren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spamassassin and ~/.forward
Nick White wrote:
> Ok, I see what you're saying. My current .procmailrc file looks like
> this:
&g
ly 29, 2003 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spamassassin and ~/.forward
"Nick White" wrote:
> Hi RHML,
>
> I have spamassassin running and configured, but ~/.forward is called
> before ~/.procmailrc. This results in mail being forwarded before it
is
> run throug
Hi RHML,
I have spamassassin running and configured, but ~/.forward is called
before ~/.procmailrc. This results in mail being forwarded before it is
run through spamassassin. Besides using a milter for sendmail, is there
any way to scan mail being forwarded through ~/.forward?
Thanks,
Nick
-
Dude, that's pretty gross. You should try applying the latest
patches...
-Original Message-
From: John Doesovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did we get hacked?
hacked foot maybe
http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/bc/john
, June 26, 2003 6:16 PM
To: redhat list
Subject: RE: pop3s / Outlook
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:38, Nick White wrote:
> yeah, I can telnet to the port, and I can even hit it using
> https://foo.example.org:995/. IE of course tells me there is an
invalid
> cert, and when I accept, I see:
>
I don't think special accounts are necessary, because I can use pop3s
from mozilla's mail client, just not Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Lazor, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: pop3s / Outlook
Does the pop3s you're
hen I turn on SSL (port 995), it won't connect... I
know that the server is running properly, because when I run Mozilla
mail locally, it works. Any suggestions, gotchas or ideas?
oh yeah, I'm running a standard install of RedHat 9 with the default
ipop3s. It's running from xi
Yeah, yeah... Sorry about the HTML Forgot to turn it off.
-Original Message-
From: Nick White
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pop3s / Outlook
Hi All,
I'm trying to use the ipop3s daemon instead of standard plain text pop3.
If I use the sta
g properly,
because when I run Mozilla mail locally, it works. Any suggestions,
gotchas or ideas?
oh yeah, I'm running
a standard install of RedHat 9 with the default ipop3s. It's running from
xinetd.
Thanks,
Nick
White
I've searched the archives and done some googleing on linux support for
the Linksys WPC54G 802.11g PCMCIA card. I haven't come across anyone
that has successfully gotten it to work. Have any of you had any
positive experiences with the card? I believe that it has a Broadcom
chipset.
Thanks,
-
I have used dd to dupe a lot of NTFS volumes, and it works great. If
you plan to use the duplicated drive on the network, be sure to run
sysprep on the windows drive before you pull it.
Cheers,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Brian Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 20
Did you try installing gd-1.8.4-11.i386.rpm or
gd-devel-1.8.4-11.i386.rpm? You didn't specify which RedHat version
you're using, but try installing either gd-1.x or gd-devel-x for your
RedHat version. The filenames I specified are for RedHat 9.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Mikevl [mail
Did you try installing gd-1.8.4-11.i386.rpm or
gd-devel-1.8.4-11.i386.rpm? You didn't specify which RedHat version
you're using, but try installing either gd-1.x or gd-devel-x for your
RedHat version. The filenames I specified are for RedHat 9.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Mikevl [mail
, June 09, 2003 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: routing table
Nick White wrote:
>In RedHat 9 the 169.254.0.0/16 gets added to the routing table on boot.
>Probably to play nicely with windows boxen. In Windows 2000+, if there
>is no DHCP server available, an APIPA address (
In RedHat 9 the 169.254.0.0/16 gets added to the routing table on boot.
Probably to play nicely with windows boxen. In Windows 2000+, if there
is no DHCP server available, an APIPA address (169.254.x.x) is assigned.
To stop RedHat from using it, try adding the following line to
/etc/sysconfig/net
Webmin is "da bomb". We too have been using it in linuxconf's stead.
It cuts a lot of time out of learning every service's configuration file
syntax and options.
-Original Message-
From: David Cary Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
verification is required, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
(Nick White - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
esent in this
message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
(Nick White - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and do not necessarily represent those of
linux gnomes' are at lurking:)
-Original Message-
From: Nick White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: forward roots mail
Mutt wasn't installed. I came in this morning, and I had 41 messages
fr
any errors or omissions that are present in this
message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
(Nick White - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's it. Nothing more. The message disappears into the void. Has
anyone had a similar experience, or does anyone have any advice?
Thanks in advance,
Nick White
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individ
EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail question
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:04:39PM -0800, Nick White wrote:
> I have sendmail configured exactly like the 7.2 server. Only, it
> takes a little longer to rel
rs or omissions that are present in this
message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
(Nick White - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and do not n
red, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
(Nick White - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and do not necessarily represent those of the
company.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
hment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
(Nick White - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and do not necessarily represent those of the
company.
--
redhat-list ma
According to a quick google search, HFS has been included in Linux since
2.1.x.
Check out:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=HFS+support+for+linux
And: http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-hfsplus
-Original Message-
From: Patrick [mailto:patrick.marquetecken@;pandora.be
Title: Message
I use
this quick and dirty little perl script to transfer files from my Linux boxes to
our windows backup server:
#!/usr/bin/perlopen (FTP, "|/usr/bin/ftp -n") || die "Can't open FTP
command, $!\n";print FTP <<"EOFTP";open 192.168.1.1user
username passwordbinpromptlcd /backu
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Nick White
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
anyw
lid)
*** Signed: 9/18/2002 10:13:57 AM
*** Verified: 9/18/2002 1:06:20 PM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
On 18-Sep-2002/07:42 -0700, Nick White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've called RedHat about the "Slapper" worm and it appears that the RHN
>package 0.9.6b is safe
I've called RedHat about the "Slapper" worm and it appears that the RHN
package 0.9.6b is safe. Below is a response from their support.
__
Description of your problem:
using openssl 0.9.6b from the Red Hat Network. Is this vulnerable from the
slapper worm?
Ou
51 matches
Mail list logo
