Maybe use r.rsp?
https://blog.r-hub.io/2020/06/03/vignettes/
How to include my pre-print / cheatsheet as a PDF vignette?
On April 8, 2021 12:39:20 PM PDT, "Dr. Connie Brett"
wrote:
>Hello,
>I have a package (DGEobj) that depends on the Ensembl service to look
>up information used to build the
Why aren't you using system.file()?
On May 11, 2021 1:45:37 PM PDT, Tiago Olivoto wrote:
>Dear all,
>I just submitted a new package 'pliman' (
>https://github.com/TiagoOlivoto/pliman) and it does not pass the
>incoming
>checks automatically.
>I have some images that are under '/inst/tmp_images' t
Make examples shorter so they can run faster. Wrapping everything in donttest
means that running examples() does nothing, which is counterproductive.
Techinically, vignettes are not tests or examples... but they do have the
advantage that they don't have to run quickly. But that doesn't make a v
MIT is more permissive than GPL2, so there is a collision there. But you may be
able to work it out with the author?
On June 2, 2021 10:36:00 AM PDT, Ben Staton wrote:
>My package uses the MIT license, so would that not meet the
>compatibility
>requirements?
>
>I will attempt to reach out to the
non-free software
tarpits, and transferring GPL2 code to MIT without the GPL2 author explicitly
re-releasing as MIT would allow that.
On June 2, 2021 11:51:01 PM PDT, Berwin A Turlach
wrote:
>G'day Jeff,
>
>On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:34:21 -0700
>Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
>
This is a job for a detective, not a package developer mailing list participant.
If this condition persists, CRAN will archive the package, as maintaining a
valid email address is required.
On June 18, 2021 5:29:20 PM PDT, mai zhou wrote:
>Dear developers,
>
>I was trying to send an email to th
Just don't. E.g.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12598242/global-variables-in-packages-in-r
On June 22, 2021 1:47:56 AM PDT, Siddhanta Phuyal
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>A few weeks ago, I submitted a package to CRAN. The automated system
>rejected the package showing the following note:
>
>Found th
Spelling has different importance to different people. You are expressing a
value judgement that differs from the values of R Core, but are presenting your
opinion as if they are facts. My point is that your challenging attitude IMO
makes having a conversation about those concerns difficult. (I
Exactly what errors do you think you found? It is not an error for a package to
be compatible with a range of versions of R.
On September 6, 2021 4:02:08 AM PDT, Colin Gillespie
wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>Sorry if this is the wrong mailing address.
>
>I was doing a little investigation of R versions
This advice would apply if the errors were being generated on a computer under
the package developer's control... but this looks like it is from a repo
submission.
That said, if the developer has installed packages not currently in BioC for
R4.1.1 they may need to wait for those packages to pro
I can't really see why it should be "recommended" to handle installing system
requirements inside an R package. There are many ways to satisfy such
requirements that would not involve miniconda. If you were determined to
provide such support, doing so in a normal function documented in a vignett
There is nothing official about that term. However, the meaning as intended by
the package authors seems pretty clear to me, and if some organization decides
not to allow software that is not being maintained to be relied upon then that
is their decision. I don't think slapping a different label
ing hassled by is concerned about... not
the label applied to that status.
On September 21, 2021 8:50:32 AM PDT, "Lenth, Russell V"
wrote:
>... "I am not fixing this hot mess"??? To the contrary, the README contains a
>clearly expressed intention to maintain plyr
I agree... but trouble is in the eyes of the beholder. If OP's approval process
requires use of actively-maintained software, then use of code depending on one
of these "retired"/"superceded" packages could indeed be a problem... for the
OP. OP cannot expect to be able to impose those requiremen
Grace is in the eyes of the beholder.
Using stop in your functions can be perfectly valid. But within the context of
examples or tests you need to catch those errors because one key definition of
success in normal building of a package is that no uncaught errors occur. So
either don't call thos
What if you are on Windows but running R at the command prompt, or via cygwin,
or in the console window of RStudio?
This seems unstable to me.
On September 30, 2021 11:52:16 AM PDT, Andrew Simmons
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>I'm updating my package 'this.path' which is supposed to retrieve the
>absolu
way to identify a path, but if he
covers all cases then my opinion is just an opinion.
On September 30, 2021 2:34:48 PM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>On 30/09/2021 5:21 p.m., Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> What if you are on Windows but running R at the command prompt, or via
>> cy
Duncan has used the phrase "do regular operations on the object" to divide the
use cases and emphasized that needing the attributes might be important, but he
did not come out and remind you that if you _do_ perform regular operations on
it then the outputs of those operations are likely to lose
Keep in mind that by embedding this decision into your package you may be
consuming a resource (cores) that may be more efficiently allocated by an
application-level partitioning. of available resources. I for one am not a fan
of this kind of thinking, and it makes system requirements for your p
You should ALWAYS build with the latest stable AND the latest development
versions of R before submitting.
On November 15, 2021 6:33:12 PM PST, Michael Hellstern wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I maintain a package (netgsa) that has been on CRAN since september 2021
>and recently got an email about CRAN chec
This is a null-terminated message protocol [1]. It has to be processed one byte
at a time.
[1] https://docs.basex.org/wiki/Server_Protocol
On November 27, 2021 7:45:31 AM PST, Gabor Grothendieck
wrote:
>Whether the length is variable or not isn't relevant. The point is
>whether the message is
Maybe time to learn it. At least to assemble complete messages.
That said, the design of this protocol is intrinsically inefficient. Maybe they
will upgrade if the software gets popular.
On November 27, 2021 8:24:36 AM PST, Ben Engbers
wrote:
>Op 27-11-2021 om 17:03 schreef Jeff Newmil
Google?
https://developer.r-project.org/Blog/public/2020/03/17/socket-connections-update/
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/understanding-sockets
https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/l-sockpit/
On November 27, 2021 2:36:48 PM PST, Ben Engbers wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Looks promising! Where
I don't know the answer to your question, but "beyond my ken" doesn't sound
like a very convincing reason. Mucking with any environment that isn't yours is
asking for trouble... the behavior you depend on today may come into conflict
with the code you are coordinating with when you least expect
Thanks to the ubiquity of Excel and its misguided inclusion of BOM codes in its
UTF-8 CSV format, this optimism about encoding being a corner case seems
premature. There are actually multiple options in Excel for writing CSV files,
and only one of them (not the first one fortunately) has this "f
Things like sensible legends are also impeded by using complex expressions in
aesthetics mappings, so call it a workaround if you like but creating the data
frame the way it should be _before_ giving it to ggplot has always been
recommended.
On April 30, 2022 5:09:51 AM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
wr
If you haven't settled on exactly which approach you want to use in
accomplishing the main goals of your exported package functions, then hiding
the gory details can make it easier to tell people later to sod off when you
decide those gory details functions should act different or use different
It looks like you are reading directly from URLs? How do you know the delay is
not network I/O delay?
Parallel computation is not a panacea. It allows tasks _that are CPU-bound_ to
get through the CPU-intensive work faster. You need to be certain that your
tasks actually can benefit from parall
... which is why tidyverse functions and Python datetime handling irk me so
much.
Is tidyverse time handling intrinsically broken? They have a standard practice
of reading time as UTC and then using force_tz to fix the "mistake". Same as
Python.
On October 9, 2022 6:57:06 PM PDT, Simon Urbanek
zones (UTC and local civil are a common
combination). Again, character import and manual conversion are needed.
On October 10, 2022 9:40:42 AM PDT, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 9:31 PM Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>>
>> ... which is why tidyverse functions and Python da
This is definitely not a false positive. Find a way to not run long calcs
during the CRAN build. There is no alternative.
One way this can be done is by only running your examples when an environment
variable of your choosing exists. Since CRAN machines won't configure that
variable, you can ge
Educating package authors about the semantics of URLs is not really something
the CRAN maintainers should have to do. A slash at the end of a URL implies
different URL construction for relative URLs based on the original one. [1]
I am not sure why you think https is no more secure than http... t
Isn't the whole purpose of creating a new package to introduce new algorithms?
That there is a history related to the modelsummary package is fine, but I
think the request is for references to published discussion of why modelsummary
needed to be augmented with new algorithms. It seems to me tha
Long build time for vignettes?
On January 22, 2023 10:51:30 AM PST, Klaus Schliep
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>I try to submit a new version of the package phangorn and got the mail back:
>
>"Dear maintainer,
>
>package phangorn_2.11.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
>automatically, please see
Your mistake is confusing a tool designed for _iterative development_ for a
tool designed for _delivery_.
Use R CMD build the way WRE says you should.
On May 16, 2023 9:07:05 AM PDT, Jarrett Phillips
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I'm trying to generate a `tar.gz` file on a Mac for R package submission to
if (any(c( "alaska", "hawaii") %in% zoom)){}
On June 27, 2023 9:11:09 AM PDT, "Göran Broström" wrote:
>
>
>Den 2023-06-27 kl. 17:17, skrev Göran Broström:
>> If(zoom %in% c(“alaska”, “hawaii”)…
>
>Wrong, maybe
>
>if (("alaska" %in% zoom) || ("hawaii" %in% zoom)){}
>
>
>>
>> Göran
>>
>>> 27 jun
Sure. On your computer. Install the old version of R and let it serve the
relevant docs.
Dunno of anyone doing this historical dive online for you though. Why would you
want preformatted docs if you didn't have those old versions installed?
On June 29, 2023 4:23:55 PM PDT, David Hugh-Jones
wr
Use of precompiled code is not allowed in CRAN. This looks like your package
needs to be distributed elsewhere... e.g. via GitHub.
On July 12, 2023 6:41:11 AM PDT, Russell Almond
wrote:
>I have an R package (RNetica available at
>https://ralmond.r-universe.dev/RNetica and
>https://github.com/
To whom are you addressing this question? The OpenMP developers who define the
missing-OMP_THREAD_LIMIT behaviour and-or supply default config files? The CRAN
server administrators who set the variable in their site-wide configuration
intentionally or unintentionally? Or the package authors expe
forming if they link with
compiled code that is supposed to make use of threads.
On August 23, 2023 7:24:46 AM PDT, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
>On 23.08.2023 15:58, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> To whom are you addressing this question? The OpenMP developers who define
>> the missing
Sanity seems to be in the eye of the beholder. FWIW I am certainly not CRAN or
R Core, but I pretty strongly disagree with any package that defaults to using
more than 2 cores. If I am using a shared HPC I can get in trouble if I
over-consume cpu resources ... i.e. I may be given access to 10 co
You have a really bizarre way of twisting what others are saying, Dirk. I have
seen no-one here saying 'limit R to 2 threads' except for you, as a way to
paint opposing views to be absurd.
What _is_ being said is that users need to be in control_, but _the default
needs to do least harm_ until
CRAN doesn't care about whether devtools is happy. R CMD check --as-cran needs
to work, e.g. as in [1].
Devtools is a convenience tool to help put all of the necessary bits in the
right places in your source code according to [2]. But if there is any
disagreement about what works, devtools is n
I don't know how you can negotiate with CRAN regarding attach, but one approach
is to return the data frame and instruct your students to write
moodledata <- paste.data()
instead of
paste.data()
since either is just as obscure as the other in the mind of a beginner and the
former promotes
Remove the library function call...
On February 23, 2019 3:43:15 PM PST, Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan
wrote:
>I'm struggling to stop receiving a NOTE about a suggested package, and
>it
>seems to be the problem for many people. Your help is really
>appreciated.
>
>In the function, I have:
>
>if(requ
Don't run R CMD check against your working directory... only run it against
your tar.gz source file. The devtools package will do this for you
automatically from within R for convenience.
On February 28, 2019 4:50:18 AM PST, "Rampal S. Etienne"
wrote:
>Dear Remi,
>
>The mod files are not in th
Do you have a question? If so, please read the Posting Guide and follow its
recommendations. (e.g. What did you do to trigger these errors in enough detail
that we could trigger them? What is your desired outcome?)
On March 3, 2019 1:11:45 PM PST, Krishan Gupta wrote:
>Original: no visible bind
I did not see any mention of the distinction between Depends and Imports in the
DESCRIPTION file... which is always a risk when duplicating existing
documentation in an email. Imports is preferred because the user does not have
to put definitions only needed inside your package into their public
0:07:12 AM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>On 11/03/2019 11:32 a.m., Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> I did not see any mention of the distinction between Depends and
>Imports in the DESCRIPTION file... which is always a risk when
>duplicating existing documentation in an email. Imports is pr
don't you think other.ot...@gmail.com is inappropriate?
On April 7, 2019 12:01:59 PM PDT, "cartograf...@gmail.com"
wrote:
>Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the
>note in 00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem
>with Author.
>I tried to put Au
I don't think "CRAN" (R Core) _ever_ did this... it was a volunteer effort by
someone independently.
On April 11, 2019 4:16:47 PM PDT, Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In the past, there were read-only mirrors of the CRAN R packages on
>GitHub
>(i.e., https://github.com/cran/).
>I cann
You could go down this rabbit hole if you like, but I suspect it has something
to do with maintaining compatibility with multiple operating systems and I
doubt R Core will explore the consequences of this change for you. Windows, for
example, allows long file names but has some nasty corners tha
You cannot go littering the user directories with sample files. Such examples
would have to be dontrun, but in order to make some of the example runnable as
is you would also need examples that use system.file paradigm. If you store the
temporary file name in a variable then the user can retriev
I find the idea of using setwd in examples disturbing, because I try to avoid
using setwd at all as a way to delegate my choice of working directory to the
operating system actions taken when starting R. In other words, I recommend to
beginners that they start R in their working directory and l
It pays to read the archives before posting
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2019q2/003941.html
On May 16, 2019 6:31:19 AM PDT, "Goldfeld, Keith"
wrote:
>Good morning -
>
>I have one final issue that is preventing me from a successful
>submission of my package simstudy to CRAN
Regarding the global variables... I found [1] illuminating, in particular the
comments on the solution.
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41954302/where-to-create-package-environment-variables
On June 4, 2019 11:07:20 AM PDT, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>On 04/06/2019 8:36 a.m., Bernd JAGLA
>> any(is.infinite(fval)) || any(is.na(fval))
>
>a little typo here: it should be '|', not '||', right ?
Since `any` collapses the vectors to length 1 either will work, but I would
prefer `||`.
On June 7, 2019 6:51:29 AM PDT, Serguei Sokol wrote:
>On 07/06/2019 15:31, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
>>
What do you mean by
"call an external text file"
? Text files are data... do you want to open it and read it? Are you familiar
with the system.file() function?
On June 19, 2019 5:45:51 AM CDT, mark padgham wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>I'm developing a package which primarily relies on C code that its
I have not had much luck doing package development on network drives. Try using
a local drive.
On June 20, 2019 11:26:42 AM CDT, Tomas Kalibera
wrote:
>If you have not already done so, I'd check the package directory (and
>its parent) is not opened in any application, including Windows
>Explo
A) You cannot assume the package code will have write access to the library
directories. The user/admin who installs the package may never load the package.
B) Downloading binary files for execution without the direct involvement of the
user/admin is a security risk.
C) Open-source package lice
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/tempfile.html
?tempdir
On July 4, 2019 3:25:25 PM PDT, Michael Gruenstaeudl
wrote:
>Assume an R package that generates a figure ('output.pdf') as the
>result
>of executing the example code specified in one of the manual files
>(i.e.
>an
Not seeing in "Writing R Extensions" a way to annotate a block quote in an Rd
file. Any suggestions?
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Ehh... not that much. Will make do with a couple of quote marks. Thanks for the
confirmation.
On July 4, 2019 5:48:56 PM PDT, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>On 04/07/2019 7:43 p.m., Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> Not seeing in "Writing R Extensions" a way to annotate a block quote
This is why I only put localization variables in .Rprofile and am always
putting such options into my project-specific scripts.
This may sound like I am a masochist, but I hate sharing my scripts with
someone else contaminated with compatibility bombs like that.
On July 6, 2019 8:19:27 PM PDT,
Pipes are very functional, unlike data.table. However, their extensive use of
non-standard evaluation a la `subset` or `with` does complicate the package
check process.
As to the actual question, Imports announces that the magrittr package is a
private dependency for your package. Users would h
I think yes. If a direct user of graphics opted not to call smoothScatter then
they would have no need to even install KernSmooth. However, since generics
automatically trigger loading of class-specific methods, one of which in your
case includes that dependency, your package cannot avoid at lea
Wouldn't you just refer to [1] or one of the links mentioned there?
[1] https://cran.r-project.org/package=bssm
On September 1, 2019 7:22:43 AM PDT, Spencer Graves
wrote:
>Hello:
>
>
> How can I get a URL for a frame?
>
>
> Specifically, I want a URL that I can cite for the "bssm:
On
>Behalf Of Georgi Boshnakov
>Sent: 01 September 2019 15:57
>To: Spencer Graves; Jeff Newmiller; r-package-devel@r-project.org
>Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] URL of a frame (or a vignette)?
>
>It may be better to use the canonical url,
>https://cran.r-project.org/package=bssm, as in:
I don't know if [1] implies vignette persistence after archiving, but it might.
I think it just has to fall back to a warning with an archive link to qualify.
(Quite a slick trick if so because there can potentially be a parade of
different package vignettes over time.)
[1] https://stat.ethz.ch
I don't think this list is only for questions about submitting to CRAN, but it
is specific to writing packages for R. If your question could just as
easily apply to another language then you probably ought to ask elsewhere.
Perhaps https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic ?
On
Both of your examples are incompatible.
foo <- function (a, b, c, d, e = NA )
(add with default value) would be compatible.
Your second example cannot be made compatible even with default values because
the positional behaviour has changed.
On September 25, 2019 6:51:58 AM PDT, David Hugh-Jone
ate the force of the idea that an API
>change
>is an API change, and should be defined precisely.
>
>Best,
>David
>
>
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 15:01, Jeff Newmiller
>wrote:
>
>> Both of your examples are incompatible.
>>
>> foo <- function (a, b, c,
ts, given the position of ... . So maybe this is my get
>out of
>jail free card. If I add "fill", existing function calls won't break,
>and I
>can call this "adding functionality in a backwards-compatible manner".
>
>David
>
>
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2
Read the Posting Guide... sending html formatted email corrupts your message.
Reading between the garbage...
a) Pasting an extension is not necessary.
b) using tempfile() in your example as an argument to sink( file=) is a
straightforward way to illustrate that a file can be created.
On Septemb
Seems quite clear to me. If dplyr chooses to re-implement pipes (e.g. based on
[1]) then you should not be importing from magrittr unless you had a specific
reason to, and if you do then you should not make assumptions about where the
dplyr pipe came from.
[1] https://github.com/moodymudskipper
I suspect David did not read the subject line. This is about winbuilder [1]. I
don't know who runs that service (Uwe?), but this sounds like they need to
investigate.
[1] https://win-builder.r-project.org/
On October 29, 2019 9:28:23 AM PDT, David Winsemius
wrote:
>
>On 10/29/19 4:48 AM, Kevi
Once again, you can color me mystified. Are you reading logs not referred to in
this email thread?
On October 29, 2019 12:28:59 PM PDT, David Winsemius
wrote:
>
>On 10/29/19 12:22 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> I suspect David did not read the subject line. This is about
>winbuild
wrote:
>
>On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> Once again, you can color me mystified. Are you reading logs not
>referred to in this email thread?
>
>Hi Jeff;
>
>I suppose am reading else. I ran:
>
>maintainer("rJava")
>
>
>... a
There are three types of quoting in R... " and ' are for strings, and `
(backtick) is for symbols.
On November 7, 2019 6:35:49 AM PST, b...@denney.ws wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>Short version of the question: How does one document a method for the
>"("
>class in a .Rd file?
>
>
>
>Details:
>
>I recentl
\\@" <- 1
>
>(This is selected to show how bad things can be done-- not as an
>example to advocate.)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Newmiller
>Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:43 AM
>To: r-package-devel@r-project.org; b...@denney.ws
>Subject: Re:
You could use DiagrammeR.
On December 3, 2019 7:36:19 AM PST, Michael Dewey
wrote:
>I am planning to include a flow-chart in the vignette of one of my
>packages (metap). I am planning to draw it using dot from Graphviz. I
>know that there is Rgraphviz which would do the whole thing in R but I
I have not had good luck building packages for final delivery using devtools...
use the command line, Luke!
On December 5, 2019 7:40:46 AM PST, Mat Fok via R-package-devel
wrote:
>Hi Max,
>Following your comment about, ".Rbuildignore is used by R CMD build to
>exclude some files from the bundle
Pandoc is not part of the standard R documentation tooling... you must be doing
something special, and doing something special makes getting a package accepted
more challenging. Perhaps if you were more specific you might get a more
specific response.
On January 6, 2020 1:38:44 PM PST, Fernando
As an existing package I suspect that it already calls the R RNG, but the
default RNG changed [1] so you need to call
RNGkind(sample.kind = "Rounding") before calling set.seed in your test code to
compare with old results.
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47199415/is-set-seed-consistent-
Complex system dependencies are not cleanly handled by the R packaging system,
but Suggesting other packages is. You could create or re-use an existing
package for each external dependency and possibly even let the user specify
which one they want to your dependent package the way DBI handles da
In your examples.
On February 4, 2020 5:53:08 PM PST, Marcelo Araya Salas
wrote:
>Hi all
>
>I got this error from CRAN tests:
>
>Warning: parse error in file 'Rraven-Ex.R':
>'\.' is an unrecognized escape in character string starting ""\."
>
>However, I can't find the original file where the err
I don't think it is possible to avoid exporting S3 methods from a package and
still have the class behave as intended. Use a regular function if name
encapsulation is important to you.
On February 17, 2020 8:33:30 AM PST, b...@denney.ws wrote:
>Thanks for the pointer! Adding
>"S3method(knit_pri
README.md is a github convention... do not try to treat it like part of the R
package documentation. Instead, list it in your .Rbuildignore file and use it
to inform developers how to change the package and to direct (potential) users
browsing the GitHub repo to read the more conventional R docu
>
>Appreciate the help!
>
>On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jeff Newmiller
>
>wrote:
>
>> README.md is a github convention... do not try to treat it like part
>of
>> the R package documentation. Instead, list it in your .Rbuildignore
>file
>> and use it to i
very nice to
>have.
>
>I'm not sure what the error you are seeing is, but having README on
>CRAN is
>nice.
>
>Have you .Rbuildignore 'd README.Rmd?? That should be ignored if I
>remember
>correctly.
>
>-Robert
>
>On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 5:55 PM Jeff Newmille
You seem to think this is a bad thing. R does encourage lenient argument
checking... what rock have you been under for the last 20 years?
On March 8, 2020 5:41:51 AM PDT, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>You're quite right :-) But I think the polemic still holds, because I
>have
>to add manual argument
the form:
>
>@param ... Not used.
>
>Cheers,
>David
>
>
>On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 16:24, Jeff Newmiller
>wrote:
>
>> You seem to think this is a bad thing. R does encourage lenient
>argument
>> checking... what rock have you been under for the last 20 ye
argument
then we are back into the generic conundrum again and the user will experience
the normal function failing to catch unused arguments.
On March 8, 2020 10:14:49 AM PDT, Jeff Newmiller
wrote:
>R encourages the use of ... particularly in S3 generics, to avoid
>over-depend
case should inherit from
>the general, so that an lm is a glm, not a glm is an lm. It's way too
>late to change this now, of course.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: R-package-devel On Behalf
>Of David Hugh-Jones
>Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2020 6:28 PM
>To: Jeff New
I am just a lurker (not representing CRAN) but I am having a hard time
understanding your question.
Binary packages are a convenience for users, not a method for submitting
packages. When you have an R package accepted it is accepted in source format.
If it doesn't exclude support for Windows or
One could take the position that the library and require functions were a
mistake to begin with and that all contributed packages should be accessed
using ::... or one could recognize that these functions are an expected
feature of R at this point and then it is not defensible to ban the propos
Either use the data() function to retrieve it or use the
LazyData: true
line in your DESCRIPTION file.
On April 6, 2020 11:25:21 PM PDT, jared_wood wrote:
>Dear all，
>
>I have three datasets (drugbank.rda edgar.rda mala.rda) in my package
>and I put them in the document folder which called “dat
n simply prints the output on the command line.
>
>
>ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Jeff Newmiller [jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us]
>An: r-package-devel@r-project.org, Duncan Murdoch
>[murdoch.dun...@gmail.com], Stefan Lenz IMBI
>[l...@imbi.uni-fr
AFAIK, no, though if the upstream package cannot (or won't) be implemented
without that system requirement and it really is a requirement for this package
then you might want to indicate "libzzz via Package X" just to be clear for
users. If it isn't a requirement for most of your functionality t
You can get away with a lot if you are not distributing your package. But I
usually try to satisfy R CMD check at least.
On April 16, 2020 5:50:04 PM PDT, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>On 17/04/20 12:14 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 16/04/2020 8:12 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm writing a pack
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
