Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice for addressing CRAN rejection

2025-05-13 Thread Ben Bolker
Can you please clarify (maybe by linking back to an earlier thread, don't remember if you discussed this previously) what you mean by "I realized that because all.equal() does not test (even as a proxy) that the same calculations were done"? On Tue, May 13, 2025, 1:05 PM smallepsilon wrote: > I

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice for addressing CRAN rejection

2025-05-13 Thread smallepsilon
Ben, The thread to which I alluded is here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2025-May/480866.html Further clarification: The package provides some convenience shortcuts for the user which should run the same calculations as their longer counterparts. I want to use identical() to provide s

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice for addressing CRAN rejection

2025-05-13 Thread Ben Bolker
Hmm. The thread you linked to is specifically an issue with non-deterministic linear algebra, the solution to which is to disable threaded computations. I don't think CRAN multithreads by default (and I don't know if they test on MKL at all ...?) Can you provide more specific/concrete exa

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice for addressing CRAN rejection

2025-05-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 13 May 2025 at 21:07, Ben Bolker wrote: | threaded computations. I don't think CRAN multithreads by default (and I | don't know if they test on MKL at all ...?) CRAN itself writes at https://cran.r-project.org/CRAN_team.htm : CRAN QA CRAN package checks on combinations of various plat