Hi All:
I am working on a new submission of my xtractomatic package (the main change
being the use of https). I develop on a Mac. When I run on the Mac:
devtools::check()
I get no errors, notes, or warnings. However, when I run
devtools::build_win(), the response I get back isL
> * check
I think this is a ggplot2-related issue. Matt Dowle posted about it:
http://blog.h2o.ai/2016/12/behind-the-scenes-of-cran/
On 16-12-29 01:16 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am working on a new submission of my xtractomatic package (the
> main change being the use
Sorry, correction/clarification to my last post: it's *not* a bug in
ggplot2, rather apparently (?) it's something in base R that has broken
tests in both data.table and ggplot2. (Since your code calls ggplot,
though, it's presumably in there somewhere, and (?) not your problem.)
cheers
Be
Thanks, that is a big help because I had no idea what the error was referring
to,. Can I put this in my comments to cran and that will be sufficient?
Normally any warning is sufficient for rejection?
I just want to make certain the updated submission goes a cleanly as possible.
-Roy
> On D
On 29/12/2016 1:24 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
Sorry, correction/clarification to my last post: it's *not* a bug in
ggplot2, rather apparently (?) it's something in base R that has broken
tests in both data.table and ggplot2. (Since your code calls ggplot,
though, it's presumably in there somewhere,
Thanks, but as I said, my next question is how best to proceed with CRAN. I
do not want to waste peoples' time with a submission that I know before hand
will be rejected. Can I submit with this warning?
-Roy
> On Dec 29, 2016, at 10:38 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 29/12/2016 1:24 PM
On 29/12/2016 1:44 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote:
Thanks, but as I said, my next question is how best to proceed with CRAN. I
do not want to waste peoples' time with a submission that I know before hand
will be rejected. Can I submit with this warning?
I'd recommend waiting a
Thanks. I can wait. I will also see if I can figure out a work around in the
meantime. Is the submission to winbuild automated? That is really the only
way I have to check, but I don't want to keep on checking if someone's time is
being wasted by that. If automated, the I don't mind making
HI All:
If any cares, the offending line is in the ggplot2 file utilities.r where it
has:
> #' A waiver object.
> #'
> #' A waiver is a "flag" object, similar to \code{NULL}, that indicates the
> #' calling function should just use the default value. It is used in certain
> #' functions to d
On 29/12/2016 2:58 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote:
HI All:
If any cares, the offending line is in the ggplot2 file utilities.r where it
has:
#' A waiver object.
#'
#' A waiver is a "flag" object, similar to \code{NULL}, that indicates the
#' calling function should just use the d
10 matches
Mail list logo
